To the Dumps. Speak up, let's hear your story
Comments
-
people can't fucking think outside the box anymore. If you think Obama/Hilary/Bernie are idiots, that means you're a card carrying republican. If you think trump/bush/Romney suck ass, then nyiu are a libtarded democrat. Hondo falls into this line of retard.
-
I don't think Hilary is an idiot.
I think she's a ca-hunt.
Let's not confuse the two.
-
Obama is actually a sharp dude who has the temperament to be president, even if you don't like his policies.WeAreAFatLesboSchool said:people can't fucking think outside the box anymore. If you think Obama/Hilary/Bernie are idiots, that means you're a card carrying republican. If you think trump/bush/Romney suck ass, then nyiu are a libtarded democrat. Hondo falls into this line of retard.
Hillary has tons of experience and, as secretary of state, has more inside knowledge of world. But I'm not sure how some countries will respect a female president.
Sanders is just way too liberal, but he has the most conviction in his policies.
Trump is a smart businessman but is very short sighted to reality with politics. You can't bully your way with money as president. And he doesn't have the temperament or patience.
Bush is Bush. He has no charisma and can't find a way to separate himself of the noise of the other candidates. But he is the most experienced of the Republicans and I don't think he has the "we must take over the middle East no matter what" that his brother did.
Romney would have made a good president and has the temperament. But Romney was too wishy washy and lacked conviction like Kerry. He pandered too much so you had no idea who you were actually voting for.
Rubio I think would make a good president, but he's too inexperienced right now and his base doesn't like his immigration policies. I think in 8 years he might make a run. -
Just so we're clear, Hondo is a democrat, not a liberal.2001400ex said:
Obama is actually a sharp dude who has the temperament to be president, even if you don't like his policies.WeAreAFatLesboSchool said:people can't fucking think outside the box anymore. If you think Obama/Hilary/Bernie are idiots, that means you're a card carrying republican. If you think trump/bush/Romney suck ass, then nyiu are a libtarded democrat. Hondo falls into this line of retard.
Hillary has tons of experience and, as secretary of state, has more inside knowledge of world. But I'm not sure how some countries will respect a female president.
Sanders is just way too liberal, but he has the most conviction in his policies.
Trump is a smart businessman but is very short sighted to reality with politics. You can't bully your way with money as president. And he doesn't have the temperament or patience.
Bush is Bush. He has no charisma and can't find a way to separate himself of the noise of the other candidates. But he is the most experienced of the Republicans and I don't think he has the "we must take over the middle East no matter what" that his brother did.
Romney would have made a good president and has the temperament. But Romney was too wishy washy and lacked conviction like Kerry. He pandered too much so you had no idea who you were actually voting for.
Rubio I think would make a good president, but he's too inexperienced right now and his base doesn't like his immigration policies. I think in 8 years he might make a run. -
This election will show once again, and now more than ever, that the policy and process of a true Democracy to elect Federal leaders is broken. It's been that way since TV and radio came of age. There are probably a hundred thousand people out there that are better fit to run the country than Hilary, Sanders, Trump or any of the other clowns the RNC/DNC is trying to prop and trot in 2016.
It's easy to blame the media but that's like blaming the cartels solely instead of the consumers for all of the drugs in America. We are getting the governance we deserve at least as the current set up goes. We not only allow for the Big Money interests to choose the candidates, we also allow Big Money to dictate which one gets the spotlight and which one doesn't.
It's time for a hybrid caucus system to elect our leaders at the Federal level. One that considers a popular vote but also has influence from Caucus' across the country of State, City, county and business leaders. The current election process of President and Congress is way past FS and it's not even close. -
But how is Citizens United a big middle finger to democracy?salemcoog said:This election will show once again, and now more than ever, that the policy and process of a true Democracy to elect Federal leaders is broken. It's been that way since TV and radio came of age. There are probably a hundred thousand people out there that are better fit to run the country than Hilary, Sanders, Trump or any of the other clowns the RNC/DNC is trying to prop and trot in 2016.
It's easy to blame the media but that's like blaming the cartels solely instead of the consumers for all of the drugs in America. We are getting the governance we deserve at least as the current set up goes. We not only allow for the Big Money interests to choose the candidates, we also allow Big Money to dictate which one gets the spotlight and which one doesn't.
It's time for a hybrid caucus system to elect our leaders at the Federal level. One that considers a popular vote but also has influence from Caucus' across the country of State, City, county and business leaders. The current election process of President and Congress is way past FS and it's not even close. -
It's not. HTHThomasFremont said:
But how is Citizens United a big middle finger to democracy?salemcoog said:This election will show once again, and now more than ever, that the policy and process of a true Democracy to elect Federal leaders is broken. It's been that way since TV and radio came of age. There are probably a hundred thousand people out there that are better fit to run the country than Hilary, Sanders, Trump or any of the other clowns the RNC/DNC is trying to prop and trot in 2016.
It's easy to blame the media but that's like blaming the cartels solely instead of the consumers for all of the drugs in America. We are getting the governance we deserve at least as the current set up goes. We not only allow for the Big Money interests to choose the candidates, we also allow Big Money to dictate which one gets the spotlight and which one doesn't.
It's time for a hybrid caucus system to elect our leaders at the Federal level. One that considers a popular vote but also has influence from Caucus' across the country of State, City, county and business leaders. The current election process of President and Congress is way past FS and it's not even close. -
Yes, let's get more money into politics. I don't think the ultra wealthy have enough say under our current system. It's unfair to them.RaceBannon said:
It's not. HTHThomasFremont said:
But how is Citizens United a big middle finger to democracy?salemcoog said:This election will show once again, and now more than ever, that the policy and process of a true Democracy to elect Federal leaders is broken. It's been that way since TV and radio came of age. There are probably a hundred thousand people out there that are better fit to run the country than Hilary, Sanders, Trump or any of the other clowns the RNC/DNC is trying to prop and trot in 2016.
It's easy to blame the media but that's like blaming the cartels solely instead of the consumers for all of the drugs in America. We are getting the governance we deserve at least as the current set up goes. We not only allow for the Big Money interests to choose the candidates, we also allow Big Money to dictate which one gets the spotlight and which one doesn't.
It's time for a hybrid caucus system to elect our leaders at the Federal level. One that considers a popular vote but also has influence from Caucus' across the country of State, City, county and business leaders. The current election process of President and Congress is way past FS and it's not even close. -
Oh ok thenRaceBannon said:
It's not. HTHThomasFremont said:
But how is Citizens United a big middle finger to democracy?salemcoog said:This election will show once again, and now more than ever, that the policy and process of a true Democracy to elect Federal leaders is broken. It's been that way since TV and radio came of age. There are probably a hundred thousand people out there that are better fit to run the country than Hilary, Sanders, Trump or any of the other clowns the RNC/DNC is trying to prop and trot in 2016.
It's easy to blame the media but that's like blaming the cartels solely instead of the consumers for all of the drugs in America. We are getting the governance we deserve at least as the current set up goes. We not only allow for the Big Money interests to choose the candidates, we also allow Big Money to dictate which one gets the spotlight and which one doesn't.
It's time for a hybrid caucus system to elect our leaders at the Federal level. One that considers a popular vote but also has influence from Caucus' across the country of State, City, county and business leaders. The current election process of President and Congress is way past FS and it's not even close.
