Bleacher Report is your source??!? (Sark's lawyers)

DerekJohnson

UWerentThereMan said:

FremontTroll said:

DerekJohnson said:

Wonder why the attorneys aren't quoting from Hardcore Husky?

Just wait for the USC attorneys' answer...

USC attorneys are tanned, rested and ready.

as he emerges from THE FLAMES OF HELL

KoolAidMan

TTJ said:

AEB said:

I think he'll get a settlement. Employment law in CA is skewed towards the employee, and in Siete's defense, he admitted an addiction and admitted himself into a treatment facility whereupon he was canned. To fire someone while receiving treatment is dangerous. SCs response will be interesting. Don't assume they've got this air tight.

I'd be shocked if USC ever pays a penny. Haden asked Sark in August whether he had a problem, and the answer was no. This case isn't about disability accommodation; it's about a guy who repeatedly showed up impaired at work.

Whether Sark said no or not, he saw a psychologist and a psychiatrist and began treatment. At that point, his diagnosis should have been in the medical records. He can just ask for a release of his records.

topdawgnc

KoolAidMan said:

TTJ said:

AEB said:

I think he'll get a settlement. Employment law in CA is skewed towards the employee, and in Siete's defense, he admitted an addiction and admitted himself into a treatment facility whereupon he was canned. To fire someone while receiving treatment is dangerous. SCs response will be interesting. Don't assume they've got this air tight.

I'd be shocked if USC ever pays a penny. Haden asked Sark in August whether he had a problem, and the answer was no. This case isn't about disability accommodation; it's about a guy who repeatedly showed up impaired at work.

Whether Sark said no or not, he saw a psychologist and a psychiatrist and began treatment. At that point, his diagnosis should have been in the medical records. He can just ask for a release of his records.

He's getting something, but not 30 million.

GrundleStiltzkin

topdawgnc said:

KoolAidMan said:

TTJ said:

AEB said:

I think he'll get a settlement. Employment law in CA is skewed towards the employee, and in Siete's defense, he admitted an addiction and admitted himself into a treatment facility whereupon he was canned. To fire someone while receiving treatment is dangerous. SCs response will be interesting. Don't assume they've got this air tight.

I'd be shocked if USC ever pays a penny. Haden asked Sark in August whether he had a problem, and the answer was no. This case isn't about disability accommodation; it's about a guy who repeatedly showed up impaired at work.

Whether Sark said no or not, he saw a psychologist and a psychiatrist and began treatment. At that point, his diagnosis should have been in the medical records. He can just ask for a release of his records.

He's getting something, but not 30 million.

Chlamydia?

TTJ

KoolAidMan said:

Whether Sark said no or not, he saw a psychologist and a psychiatrist and began treatment. At that point, his diagnosis should have been in the medical records. He can just ask for a release of his records.

UWerentThereMan

and he had a CONTRACT!