Ohio State

gabemarksknee

How can Stanford even be discussed as a potential darkhorse candidate if things fell right...ahead of Ohio State?

Ohio St won it last year, lost at home to MSU ... who beat Oregon.

after today:

Clemson #1
Bama #2
Oklahoma #3
Michigan St #4

Ohio St #5 ahead of Stanford, UNC (even if they win), Iowa...

RaceBannon

Stanford is not getting in ahead of our Buckeyes

Southerndawg

*Huskeyes

Mad_Son

Buck the Fuckeyes!

Oh wait...

BennyBeaver

Please can Oklahomo get the shaft and be excluded?

Please?

whatshouldicareabout

Stanford would have a conference championship and Ohio State would be 2nd in the Legends or Leaders or whatever.

Ty Willingham and the other skeletors of the selection committee love conference championships, even if it says Pac-12 next to it.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

whatshouldicareabout said:

Stanford would have a conference championship and Ohio State would be 2nd in the Legends or Leaders or whatever.

Ty Willingham and the other skeletors of the selection committee love conference championships, even if it says Pac-12 next to it.

Ty Willingham won a PAC 10 championship once which is indicative of how great a coach he was.

gabemarksknee

whatshouldicareabout said:

Stanford would have a conference championship and Ohio State would be 2nd in the Legends or Leaders or whatever.

Ty Willingham and the other skeletors of the selection committee love conference championships, even if it says Pac-12 next to it.

Do we want the best 4 or not?

NeGgaPlEaSe

Stanford won't beat USC

Thump

Furd's win over Notre Dame >> tOSU's loss to MSU (who beat Oregon)

Plus, what has already been written about conf champs, even if it is the P12.

That's all I got.

topdawgnc

If tOSU goes.

Conference championshits don't mean anything.

And in actuality ... the best strategy would be to NOT play in that extra game. How great is it for tOSU to not risk losing again and make it in over Iowa or North Carolina.

The playoff system has actually pussified America's greatest sport.

Pac now talking about 8 conference games, weaker schedules ...

Christ.

Take it down to four conferences, 8 divisions.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

I don't get putting two loss teams ahead of one loss teams. Who gives a fuck about the conference championship game?

topdawgnc

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

I don't get putting two loss teams ahead of one loss teams. Who gives a fuck about the conference championship game?

Then why have the conference championship game?

Why not just have everyone play 13 games?

It becomes a disadvantage to win your division if not in the Big12

Thump

Looks like it won't matter because neither team is going.

EwaDawg

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

Stanford won't beat USC

Disagree

Tequilla

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

I don't get putting two loss teams ahead of one loss teams. Who gives a fuck about the conference championship game?

2 losses against a highly competitive schedule versus 1 loss against a relative cupcake schedule ...

This bored should be better than looking at simply 1 loss vs 2 losses and assuming all things are equal

NeGgaPlEaSe

USC's coaching staff is a Drek. USC by far the most talented team in the Pac 12 (UCLA had injuries) Further proof of Pat HaddenFS. Look for USC to be real shitty until Pat HaddenFS is fired. They care less about wining football than UW. Ghost of Babs. Remember this is the same Stanford team the Coogs had on the ropes


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyeodbfH5nc

whatshouldicareabout

NeGgaPlEaSe said:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyeodbfH5nc

I see your video and raise you:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22ZXJAo-GIQ

PurpleBaze