6 SEC teams play FCS opponents this weekend...
Comments
-
Nicely put Road. Al a bama has not played the 2nd strongest sched. Alot of bias is inherent in that. What team has bama beat that is legit top 25? The only team worthy of ranking is Arkansas, and they're unranked. Arkansas is playing better than anyone. Alabama has beat 1 ranked team. Is that the 2nd best sched? Fucking tards galore around here.RoadDawg55 said:I've never argued that the SEC isn't the best conference, but you fluffers are FS sometimes.
The only really good team is Alabama. There are 4 or 5 other pretty good teams. The team that was touted as a top 4 team just got dominated by Bama and lost to a might Arkansas team that lost to Toledo and Texas Tech. The SEC East champ needed a late FG to beat Vandy. It's not that far superior to the other conferences.
Most of these teams play 8 conference games and schedule 4 patsies. Arguing that they play really tough schedules is dumb and easy to pick apart. -
It's easy to pad a resume when your conference starts off with nine teams ranked. Fuck off Sven, that makes a difference.dnc said:
Ohio State has played no one. At all. Iowa beat Wisky which is a solid win and a massively overrated Northwestern team. That's it. Iowa could very easily finish the regular season undefeated without a win over anyone in the final top 25. Ohio State will at least have to earn it if they finish undefeated.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Iowa and Ohio State are undefeated and no SEC team is.
-
Doogs
-
Here's the thing. If you play in a Power 5 conference, and you win all your games or only lose one, and you aren't Baylor, you will almost certainly make the playoff.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's easy to pad a resume when your conference starts off with nine teams ranked. Fuck off Sven, that makes a difference.dnc said:
Ohio State has played no one. At all. Iowa beat Wisky which is a solid win and a massively overrated Northwestern team. That's it. Iowa could very easily finish the regular season undefeated without a win over anyone in the final top 25. Ohio State will at least have to earn it if they finish undefeated.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Iowa and Ohio State are undefeated and no SEC team is.
Quit bitching, start winning. Fuck the rest of the Pac-12, SEC, ACC, or whatever.
Just win. That's the point of the fucking game, is to score more points than the other guy and win more games.
This is something that was really driven home to me during the last six or so years when Oregon was good. If you win, things take care of themselves. If you have to root for other teams to win or lose so something good happens to your team, your team isn't that good anyway and it doesn't really matter.
Like this year. Oregon could still get to the conference championship game if we(!) win out and Stanford loses to Cal. But if I really start caring about the Big Game, that makes me a faggot. So if it happens I'll be happy, but I'm probably not going to turn on #Pac12AfterDark on Saturday because I will be shitface-wasted after the early games. -
So if you've won all of your games, like Iowa, and you're behind a one loss team, there isn't a legitimate grievance?AZDuck said:
Here's the thing. If you play in a Power 5 conference, and you win all your games or only lose one, and you aren't Baylor, you will almost certainly make the playoff.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's easy to pad a resume when your conference starts off with nine teams ranked. Fuck off Sven, that makes a difference.dnc said:
Ohio State has played no one. At all. Iowa beat Wisky which is a solid win and a massively overrated Northwestern team. That's it. Iowa could very easily finish the regular season undefeated without a win over anyone in the final top 25. Ohio State will at least have to earn it if they finish undefeated.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Iowa and Ohio State are undefeated and no SEC team is.
Quit bitching, start winning. Fuck the rest of the Pac-12, SEC, ACC, or whatever.
Just win. That's the point of the fucking game, is to score more points than the other guy and win more games.
This is something that was really driven home to me during the last six or so years when Oregon was good. If you win, things take care of themselves. If you have to root for other teams to win or lose so something good happens to your team, your team isn't that good anyway and it doesn't really matter.
Like this year. Oregon could still get to the conference championship game if we(!) win out and Stanford loses to Cal. But if I really start caring about the Big Game, that makes me a faggot. So if it happens I'll be happy, but I'm probably not going to turn on #Pac12AfterDark on Saturday because I will be shitface-wasted after the early games.
-
If Iowa is unbeaten at the end of the season, they will be in because they will have beaten Ohio State or Michigan State.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
So if you've won all of your games, like Iowa, and you're behind a one loss team, there isn't a legitimate grievance?AZDuck said:
Here's the thing. If you play in a Power 5 conference, and you win all your games or only lose one, and you aren't Baylor, you will almost certainly make the playoff.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's easy to pad a resume when your conference starts off with nine teams ranked. Fuck off Sven, that makes a difference.dnc said:
Ohio State has played no one. At all. Iowa beat Wisky which is a solid win and a massively overrated Northwestern team. That's it. Iowa could very easily finish the regular season undefeated without a win over anyone in the final top 25. Ohio State will at least have to earn it if they finish undefeated.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Iowa and Ohio State are undefeated and no SEC team is.
Quit bitching, start winning. Fuck the rest of the Pac-12, SEC, ACC, or whatever.
Just win. That's the point of the fucking game, is to score more points than the other guy and win more games.
This is something that was really driven home to me during the last six or so years when Oregon was good. If you win, things take care of themselves. If you have to root for other teams to win or lose so something good happens to your team, your team isn't that good anyway and it doesn't really matter.
Like this year. Oregon could still get to the conference championship game if we(!) win out and Stanford loses to Cal. But if I really start caring about the Big Game, that makes me a faggot. So if it happens I'll be happy, but I'm probably not going to turn on #Pac12AfterDark on Saturday because I will be shitface-wasted after the early games. -
I can't believe you had to spell that out.AZDuck said:
If Iowa is unbeaten at the end of the season, they will be in because they will have beaten Ohio State or Michigan State.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
So if you've won all of your games, like Iowa, and you're behind a one loss team, there isn't a legitimate grievance?AZDuck said:
Here's the thing. If you play in a Power 5 conference, and you win all your games or only lose one, and you aren't Baylor, you will almost certainly make the playoff.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's easy to pad a resume when your conference starts off with nine teams ranked. Fuck off Sven, that makes a difference.dnc said:
Ohio State has played no one. At all. Iowa beat Wisky which is a solid win and a massively overrated Northwestern team. That's it. Iowa could very easily finish the regular season undefeated without a win over anyone in the final top 25. Ohio State will at least have to earn it if they finish undefeated.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Iowa and Ohio State are undefeated and no SEC team is.
Quit bitching, start winning. Fuck the rest of the Pac-12, SEC, ACC, or whatever.
Just win. That's the point of the fucking game, is to score more points than the other guy and win more games.
This is something that was really driven home to me during the last six or so years when Oregon was good. If you win, things take care of themselves. If you have to root for other teams to win or lose so something good happens to your team, your team isn't that good anyway and it doesn't really matter.
Like this year. Oregon could still get to the conference championship game if we(!) win out and Stanford loses to Cal. But if I really start caring about the Big Game, that makes me a faggot. So if it happens I'll be happy, but I'm probably not going to turn on #Pac12AfterDark on Saturday because I will be shitface-wasted after the early games.
Actually, yes, I do believe it.
This is why retards love midseason rankings debates. -
Doogs
-
So I'll put you down for being in favor of BYU's 1984 National Championship.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
So if you've won all of your games, like Iowa, and you're behind a one loss team, there isn't a legitimate grievance?AZDuck said:
Here's the thing. If you play in a Power 5 conference, and you win all your games or only lose one, and you aren't Baylor, you will almost certainly make the playoff.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
It's easy to pad a resume when your conference starts off with nine teams ranked. Fuck off Sven, that makes a difference.dnc said:
Ohio State has played no one. At all. Iowa beat Wisky which is a solid win and a massively overrated Northwestern team. That's it. Iowa could very easily finish the regular season undefeated without a win over anyone in the final top 25. Ohio State will at least have to earn it if they finish undefeated.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:Iowa and Ohio State are undefeated and no SEC team is.
Quit bitching, start winning. Fuck the rest of the Pac-12, SEC, ACC, or whatever.
Just win. That's the point of the fucking game, is to score more points than the other guy and win more games.
This is something that was really driven home to me during the last six or so years when Oregon was good. If you win, things take care of themselves. If you have to root for other teams to win or lose so something good happens to your team, your team isn't that good anyway and it doesn't really matter.
Like this year. Oregon could still get to the conference championship game if we(!) win out and Stanford loses to Cal. But if I really start caring about the Big Game, that makes me a faggot. So if it happens I'll be happy, but I'm probably not going to turn on #Pac12AfterDark on Saturday because I will be shitface-wasted after the early games. -
-
The B1G and the SEC have a defacto challenge in their bowl match ups. The B1G cleaned up last year which really helped bring their rep back. Results are amazing things.
Both leagues have a huge advantage with east coast January 1 or thereabouts bowl games.
We(?) get match ups with the Mountain West in early December.
The Pac 12 is only going to fall farther behind with out women's tennis commissioner. I can watch every B1G and SEC game every week. Then the best bowl games.
The stat that Road posted about NFL players shows how far the Pac is falling. In the 80's and 90's the Pac 12 was the best league with the best players and quarterbacks. That's where puppy lives these days, in the past.
Oregon has been far superior to every Pac 12 team the past half dozen years or so other than Stanford. Yet nationally they struggle. They win close or lose. They beat most Pac teams by 4 TDs. Or did.
They are putting players into the NFL but not war daddy D linemen and not at the All Pro level of the SEC.
Your eyes don't lie. Those SEC games have better players playing in them -
Sounds like you watch the gamesRaceBannon said:The B1G and the SEC have a defacto challenge in their bowl match ups. The B1G cleaned up last year which really helped bring their rep back. Results are amazing things.
Both leagues have a huge advantage with east coast January 1 or thereabouts bowl games.
We(?) get match ups with the Mountain West in early December.
The Pac 12 is only going to fall farther behind with out women's tennis commissioner. I can watch every B1G and SEC game every week. Then the best bowl games.
The stat that Road posted about NFL players shows how far the Pac is falling. In the 80's and 90's the Pac 12 was the best league with the best players and quarterbacks. That's where puppy lives these days, in the past.
Oregon has been far superior to every Pac 12 team the past half dozen years or so other than Stanford. Yet nationally they struggle. They win close or lose. They beat most Pac teams by 4 TDs. Or did.
They are putting players into the NFL but not war daddy D linemen and not at the All Pro level of the SEC.
Your eyes don't lie. Those SEC games have better players playing in them -
That was a great post, but Oregon would have destroyed a lot of SEC teams. They lost twice to the best teams in the country, but they were good. The runner up team played Auburn to the end and the team that lost last year plungered FSU. They were good, but Ohio State was on a mission and coached by Urban Meyer. Helfrich had no chance. They got bullied, just like Ohio State did against Florida back in the day. Urban Meyer could end up the best coach of all time. The guy has never lost a Big 10 regular season game in four years.RaceBannon said:The B1G and the SEC have a defacto challenge in their bowl match ups. The B1G cleaned up last year which really helped bring their rep back. Results are amazing things.
Both leagues have a huge advantage with east coast January 1 or thereabouts bowl games.
We(?) get match ups with the Mountain West in early December.
The Pac 12 is only going to fall farther behind with out women's tennis commissioner. I can watch every B1G and SEC game every week. Then the best bowl games.
The stat that Road posted about NFL players shows how far the Pac is falling. In the 80's and 90's the Pac 12 was the best league with the best players and quarterbacks. That's where puppy lives these days, in the past.
Oregon has been far superior to every Pac 12 team the past half dozen years or so other than Stanford. Yet nationally they struggle. They win close or lose. They beat most Pac teams by 4 TDs. Or did.
They are putting players into the NFL but not war daddy D linemen and not at the All Pro level of the SEC.
Your eyes don't lie. Those SEC games have better players playing in them
It's not as much as a conference issue as it is individual match up. I do agree that the SEC has more talent, but QB and offensive coaching matter in today's college football, and the SEC is weirdly lacking. -
Living in the past Race? The pac12's 11th worst qb would start for every SEC team except maybe Brandon Allen at Arkansas, maybe kyle Allen (who isnt even starting full time). Coker wouldnt start at any pac12 school. Maybe Oregon St, but doubt it. The pac12 is so far ahead of the SEC offensively its mind boggling, and certainly equal on defense.
In previous years the SEC could claim their defenses distinguished themselves from the pac12. SEC defenses are fucking horrible the last 2-3 years. In other words, the SEC is way behind the Pac and big10 . They squeak by the big12 only because the big12 has 10 teams, and 6 of them suck hind teat.
Come on Race, you know better. -
Coker would start here and it isn't close. There are half a dozen SEC QBs better than Brownstain
Pac 12 defenses aren't horrible? Seriously?
I think we're done here -
Were done here? Coker is a pure product of Derek Henry you butthuffing tard Race. We saw how good Coker was vs a jc pukeback in Chad Kelley. 2 horrible defenses, best qb won. It wasnt Coker. Now name me a pac12 qb kelly or Coke r would start ove r beside s brownin g and OSU'z hurdler? Notice I said 10 pac qbs? Did I mention Browning would start in the SEC?RaceBannon said:Coker would start here and it isn't close. There are half a dozen SEC QBs better than Brownstain
Pac 12 defenses aren't horrible? Seriously?
I think we're done here
Next year, when browning isnt an 18 year old true frezhman, he'll be good enough to start for 10 ou t of 14 SEC teams. The pac12 is so ahead of the SEC offensively, a nd in terms of pro ready qb's its laughable -
Uh we were done here
-
Every QB in the pac12 sucks this season, besides Falk.
I know this because I watch the games
