Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Theory on Peterman

13

Comments

  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    PurpleJ said:

    I like my theory better.

    Why not abundance.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club
    fivehundredmileDAWG said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    I don't think he enjoys coaching at all.

    When Petersen was first hired, I remember reading an article about him and how he got into coaching. He was talked into coaching the JV team at UC Davis to pay for some of his graduated degree. He originally only planned to do it for 1, or maybe two years. He was successful and this lead to him making a name in coaching circles. Then, of course, he was a commodity and continued to coach. I recall vividly that he said all he really wanted to be was a high school counselor.

    We are stuck with him. I think he still might have some mild success, maybe we peak out with a 10-3 season with a bowl win when Brownsocks is a junior or senior. It is what it is. We have fat lesbo as our President, and Woodward isn't going to feel any heat from her (unless pegging with a warm lube goes down)..... and thusly Peterman gets no heat... Sniff gets no heat... etc

    Hello 5-7 this year. 7-5 next year. Then some special 8-4ish type seasons in '17 and '18 before the new Brownsocks starts the cycle over.
    FREE PUB MOTHRFCUKERS!!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Thump
    Thump Member Posts: 793
    I'm torn. Part of me hopes/thinks he might get things headed in the right direction

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HoustonHusky
    HoustonHusky Member Posts: 6,021
    I agree...I didn't like the hire when it happened. I thought he was burned out when he started, and he's never had to do an overhaul on a program so there was no track record of whether he'd be good at it or not.

    Only chance we have is the challenge/worry that his legacy of being a "great" coach is in enough danger (and he gives enough of a rip about it) that it lights a fire in him and he puts more effort/flexibility in how he does things, but that's probably like saying when Sark was coach that he'd be good if he'd hopefully quit drinking/chasing tail and focus on coaching...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    jecornel said:

    I'm sure sure enjoyed 92-12?

    Now he enjoys 3.5 million a year mailing it in.

    Now he is what he is 12-12.

    He was badly exposed yesterday for being a really shitty coach.

    Where did you expect him to be 24 games in? He said 1.5-2 years for his process to work. Uh, I saw a contender the 1st half @ ASU, and the better and more experienced team come back and win in the second half.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,465
    DerekJohnson said:

    TTJ said:

    DerekJohnson said:

    doogville said:

    He has plenty of money to retire comfortably. Could make a good living as a tv analyst or consultant for other teams.

    I have not gotten the impression that he doesn't love coaching.

    He's not articulate enough to be a TV analyst.
    I wouldn't assume that from his coachspeak.
    It's not just from coach speak
    Yes. He's not a very technically gifted speaker. Derek should know.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,465
    edited November 2015

    Now I know how those double posts happen. Fuck.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter