Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Tequilla Thoughts: Arizona and Utah

13

Comments

  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,595 Founders Club
    Tequilla said:

    For the ADD filled people of the world:

    Arizona Game: Most complete game of season. Good to see explosive plays on offense. Defense is playing great. Arizona looked charmin soft. Concern for Rich Rod's direction of program.

    Utah Game: Key to shut down Booker in the run game. Don't let Wilson loose on read option. Force Wilson to make great throws against our strong secondary as they lack play makers there. Need to stay balanced on offense and ensure that we don't leave the defense out to dry. Turnovers and kicking game will be key. Those that think UW can't stop the run aren't paying attention.

    And, fuck off.

    Your best work.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,378 Standard Supporter
    My hippy friend used to write War and Peace emails about Bush (who I voted for..hard to believe). Then when I responded with a disagreement, there would be another 142 line response.

    You have to be concise. Four paragraphs is a lot. I'm not trying to be a dick (now) but I quit after the third one because I knew what was coming.
  • Hippopeteamus
    Hippopeteamus Member Posts: 1,958
    edited November 2015

    Hey Peteamus. You plagiarized peteamus from puppy peckerwood. Try something original for your handle.

    Why? I did add Hippo. ;)
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,283
    Fair points about being concise ...

    Generally speaking, I try to keep things short. Few things like this I will go a little more free form. Fully realize that it's not for everybody.

    One thing that would be great for @DerekJohnson to work in with the developers is to give an option in the control panel for bullet points.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    You made some good points T, and it's nice to have a poster who 'gets it' besides pup, but you have to be more concise, cut the body filler, and state your fargin points in 2-3 short paragraphs. Remember who's reading them. Paradise? J? Boobs? These guys dont know who the starting oline is and why, or couldnt care less.

    Plus it takes forever to scroll past your post and all the quote replies. i agree with a lot you said, but fuck dude, I have work to do today

    Free pub! I'm pretty sure Ossai starts at right tackle, though I could be wrong. Mods?, a question.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,378 Standard Supporter

    Tequilla said:

    Fair points about being concise ...

    Generally speaking, I try to keep things short. Few things like this I will go a little more free form. Fully realize that it's not for everybody.

    One thing that would be great for @DerekJohnson to work in with the developers is to give an option in the control panel for bullet points.

    My suggestion for bullet points when reading your posts:

    image
    You're pretty funny sometimes Race.

    I guess that's why there are all the minions out there huh
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited November 2015
    Tequilla said:


    One myth that I've seen on this board is that the UW defense isn't particularly good against the run. I'm not entirely sure that I'm seeing where that is coming from as not only are the averages against solid, but the number of long runs against are highly limited. Rushing stats on a game by game basis (excluding Sac St) by total carries, yards, yards per carry, longest gain, and leading rusher stats are below:

    Boise State: 53 for 185, 3.5 yards per carry; longest gain of 19 yards; leading rusher 24 for 89 for 3.7 yards per carry
    Utah State: 30 for 83, 2.8 yards per carry; longest gain of 20 yards; leading rusher 13 for 40, 3.1 yards per carry
    California: 51 for 139, 2.7 yards per carry; longest gain 24 yards; leading rusher 23 for 84 for 3.7 yards per carry
    USC: 39 for 190, 4.9 yards per carry; longest gain 23 yards; leading rusher 17 for 120 for 7.1 yards per carry
    Oregon: 51 for 170, 3.3 yards per carry; longest gain 18 yards; leading rusher 27 for 138 for 5.1 yards per carry
    Stanford: 48 for 188, 3.9 yards per carry; longest gain 19 yards; leading rusher 23 for 109 for 4.7 yards per carry
    Arizona: 44 for 127, 2.9 yards per carry; longest gain 16 yards; leading rusher 19 for 67 for 3.5 yards per carry

    Do your rushing statistics include QB sacks? I think the more accurate number is yards per carry by the opposing team's leading rusher.