Chest's Free pub
Comments
-
allpurpleallgold said:
They lost to Oregon, Stanford, Boise, and Cal. Basically any team with a pulse. Nothing else matters.
-
Thank you sir, your calculations were inspiring.RaceBannon said:
Plagerism but you put a much better effort than I did so I'll allow itPostGameOrangeSlices said:You've got to dig deeper into the advanced metrical statistical analytics. Our C+H^3 rating is sitting at 52.3÷2...something remarkable for a team where 3.478 out of 7.1 recruits have reached the LMF threshold. However, you have to take into account that our 4 losses impacts the z variable in the ¥+a^2 (z-81) equation, where ¥ is the LMF formula diveded by the beta of yards per play. This theorem has been getting a lot of press lately among the statically affluent, which is rather interesting.
Currently, ¥+a^2 (z-81)=23, which is admittedly surprising.
I'm still working on a way to accurately incorporate altitude into the metrics, so stay tuned. -
Wake me when we get 10 wins and one of them is Oregon.
-
Connelly's point is exactly what I'm saying. Its a deep rebuilding year and we are showing indications that we could be much better next year.
We will see how the season ends as they essentially have three near 50-50 games left plus one near gimmie. Only winning one of those three would be a disappointment. Winning 2/3 and having a chance to be 8-5 would be a sign of improvement since the start of the year.
Pete has lost too many near 50-50 games at home. Beating Utah would be a sign of another small step considering we've lost all the games over the past two seasons. -
FremontTroll said:
The key point is that there is always a giant glut of mediocre defenses in college football. We shouldn't be reading too much into small improvements in the various analytic ranking systems year over year because the margin separating any two given defenses is smaller and smaller as you move down the rankings from 1 to 60 or so.
-
As programs rise, they start at winning at home, then win on the road, then beat someone your not supposed to at home, then finally beat someone on the road your not supposed to beat.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Connelly's point is exactly what I'm saying. Its a deep rebuilding year and we are showing indications that we could be much better next year.
We will see how the season ends as they essentially have three near 50-50 games left plus one near gimmie. Only winning one of those three would be a disappointment. Winning 2/3 and having a chance to be 8-5 would be a sign of improvement since the start of the year.
Pete has lost too many near 50-50 games at home. Beating Utah would be a sign of another small step considering we've lost all the games over the past two seasons.
Utah is our home chance, and ASU is the one left on the road (I don't count USC w/ all the Sark drama going on).
-
Fixed once againRaceBannon said:allpurpleallgold said:They lost to Oregon, Stanford, Boise, Cal, Utah, ASU, Oregon State and Washington State. Basically any team with a pulse. Nothing else matters.
-
Great poast.....Mike_Honcho said:
Fixed once againRaceBannon said:allpurpleallgold said:They lost to Oregon, Stanford, Boise, Cal, Utah, ASU, Oregon State and Washington State. Basically any team with a pulse. Nothing else matters.
