Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

UW 20th in AP poll

12346»

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Fuck off sven. If uw is 4-0 after 5 weeks they could even crack the top 10, deservedly or not

    Stop being a Doog. We can worry about what UW deserves to be ranked (if it all) after the three bye weeks end and UW finally plays its second game of the season that is already over.
    Oh, Im definitely LIPO. Its just cool to see UW get national coverage and exposure that isnt from being on the receiving end of a plunger
    No argument on that. Earned pub from using the plunger >>>> offseason FREE PUB!
    Should plunger the next three teams. Abundance.
    Plungering BYE, @B1G fucking dreckfest BYE, and Big Sky fucking dreckfest BYE is a given.

    The season that is already over starts in October
    If we are as good as we showed in the first game then we should have little problem with Arizona at home.
    The same Arizona team that skullfucked UW last year? Don't sleep on them. They'll be 3-0 coming into Husky Stadium also.
    2007- UW at home blows game, close loss
    2008- Skullfucking
    2009-UW lucky win at home
    2010- Skullfucking
    2011-UW 12 point win at home
    2012-Skullfucking
    2013- See where this is going?

    Arizona will have a weaker pass offense and their defense was the worst in league last year. Not sleeping on them but if our offense gets on a roll, it should go for 50+.
    Mike Stoops was the Arizona coach in 2007, 2009, and 2011.

    Hope this helps.
    He had been fired by the 2011 game actually. Proving their A.D. is better at his job than Pool Boy since he fired a terrible coach in the middle of the year.
    Whatever.
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club

    Fuck off sven. If uw is 4-0 after 5 weeks they could even crack the top 10, deservedly or not

    Stop being a Doog. We can worry about what UW deserves to be ranked (if it all) after the three bye weeks end and UW finally plays its second game of the season that is already over.
    Oh, Im definitely LIPO. Its just cool to see UW get national coverage and exposure that isnt from being on the receiving end of a plunger
    No argument on that. Earned pub from using the plunger >>>> offseason FREE PUB!
    Should plunger the next three teams. Abundance.
    Plungering BYE, @B1G fucking dreckfest BYE, and Big Sky fucking dreckfest BYE is a given.

    The season that is already over starts in October
    If we are as good as we showed in the first game then we should have little problem with Arizona at home.
    The same Arizona team that skullfucked UW last year? Don't sleep on them. They'll be 3-0 coming into Husky Stadium also.
    2007- UW at home blows game, close loss
    2008- Skullfucking
    2009-UW lucky win at home
    2010- Skullfucking
    2011-UW 12 point win at home
    2012-Skullfucking
    2013- See where this is going?

    Arizona will have a weaker pass offense and their defense was the worst in league last year. Not sleeping on them but if our offense gets on a roll, it should go for 50+.
    Last year was the first year of the Rich Rod era at Arizona. I expect them to be better than the team that skull fucked UW for 52 points last year. The Huskies will be in a much better position since the game is at Husky Stadium, but I think I'd wait a few weeks, LIPO, before assigning an automatic "W" to this one.

    After that comes three skull fuckers in a row and there could be some bare pickling of the left and right eye sockets. @Stanford they face the most physical team they'll face all year barring some freakish tear in the space time continuum that lands them in a BCS Bowel. Then @Home vs "nine skull fuckings in a row" Oregon, and onto "winners of seven in a row " @ASU. See where I'm going with this? LIPO is the acronym of the year.
    How is Arizona going to be better without Matt Scott? Even Rich Rod has said how lucky they were to have him last year. They lost Scott and their best WR. They can run the ball but there are questions as to how well they will be able to pass this year. Defensively, they were awful last year and even if they are better I don't see how they will slow us down.
    That's a fair point, but the second year under a new coach usually means familiarity and general improvement if the coach is worth a shit. I say LIPO, we'll know more about Arizona and UW in a a few weeks.
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295

    Fuck off sven. If uw is 4-0 after 5 weeks they could even crack the top 10, deservedly or not

    Stop being a Doog. We can worry about what UW deserves to be ranked (if it all) after the three bye weeks end and UW finally plays its second game of the season that is already over.
    Oh, Im definitely LIPO. Its just cool to see UW get national coverage and exposure that isnt from being on the receiving end of a plunger
    No argument on that. Earned pub from using the plunger >>>> offseason FREE PUB!
    Should plunger the next three teams. Abundance.
    Plungering BYE, @B1G fucking dreckfest BYE, and Big Sky fucking dreckfest BYE is a given.

    The season that is already over starts in October
    If we are as good as we showed in the first game then we should have little problem with Arizona at home.
    The same Arizona team that skullfucked UW last year? Don't sleep on them. They'll be 3-0 coming into Husky Stadium also.
    2007- UW at home blows game, close loss
    2008- Skullfucking
    2009-UW lucky win at home
    2010- Skullfucking
    2011-UW 12 point win at home
    2012-Skullfucking
    2013- See where this is going?

    Arizona will have a weaker pass offense and their defense was the worst in league last year. Not sleeping on them but if our offense gets on a roll, it should go for 50+.
    Last year was the first year of the Rich Rod era at Arizona. I expect them to be better than the team that skull fucked UW for 52 points last year. The Huskies will be in a much better position since the game is at Husky Stadium, but I think I'd wait a few weeks, LIPO, before assigning an automatic "W" to this one.

    After that comes three skull fuckers in a row and there could be some bare pickling of the left and right eye sockets. @Stanford they face the most physical team they'll face all year barring some freakish tear in the space time continuum that lands them in a BCS Bowel. Then @Home vs "nine skull fuckings in a row" Oregon, and onto "winners of seven in a row " @ASU. See where I'm going with this? LIPO is the acronym of the year.
    How is Arizona going to be better without Matt Scott? Even Rich Rod has said how lucky they were to have him last year. They lost Scott and their best WR. They can run the ball but there are questions as to how well they will be able to pass this year. Defensively, they were awful last year and even if they are better I don't see how they will slow us down.
    That's a fair point, but the second year under a new coach usually means familiarity and general improvement if the coach is worth a shit. I say LIPO, we'll know more about Arizona and UW in a a few weeks.
    After non-conference play Arizona gave up 40ppg in its last 10 games. Even Colorado scored 31. Utah had 24. SteveSarkisianFS coached the worst game in human history last year.

    RichRod is a very good coach and is recruiting well but if you read between the lines of what he's said, it sounds like Matt Scott was the John Ross of Arizona last year. With a green or average QB they probably win 4-5 games and not 8. Its possible they could improve on defense but it not show because the offense takes a step back without Scott. Maybe the defense gives up 33ppg instead of 40. In any event, I just don't see Arizona having the D to slow this offense down.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    Fuck off sven. If uw is 4-0 after 5 weeks they could even crack the top 10, deservedly or not

    Stop being a Doog. We can worry about what UW deserves to be ranked (if it all) after the three bye weeks end and UW finally plays its second game of the season that is already over.
    Oh, Im definitely LIPO. Its just cool to see UW get national coverage and exposure that isnt from being on the receiving end of a plunger
    No argument on that. Earned pub from using the plunger >>>> offseason FREE PUB!
    Should plunger the next three teams. Abundance.
    Plungering BYE, @B1G fucking dreckfest BYE, and Big Sky fucking dreckfest BYE is a given.

    The season that is already over starts in October
    If we are as good as we showed in the first game then we should have little problem with Arizona at home.
    The same Arizona team that skullfucked UW last year? Don't sleep on them. They'll be 3-0 coming into Husky Stadium also.
    2007- UW at home blows game, close loss
    2008- Skullfucking
    2009-UW lucky win at home
    2010- Skullfucking
    2011-UW 12 point win at home
    2012-Skullfucking
    2013- See where this is going?

    Arizona will have a weaker pass offense and their defense was the worst in league last year. Not sleeping on them but if our offense gets on a roll, it should go for 50+.
    Last year was the first year of the Rich Rod era at Arizona. I expect them to be better than the team that skull fucked UW for 52 points last year. The Huskies will be in a much better position since the game is at Husky Stadium, but I think I'd wait a few weeks, LIPO, before assigning an automatic "W" to this one.

    After that comes three skull fuckers in a row and there could be some bare pickling of the left and right eye sockets. @Stanford they face the most physical team they'll face all year barring some freakish tear in the space time continuum that lands them in a BCS Bowel. Then @Home vs "nine skull fuckings in a row" Oregon, and onto "winners of seven in a row " @ASU. See where I'm going with this? LIPO is the acronym of the year.
    How is Arizona going to be better without Matt Scott? Even Rich Rod has said how lucky they were to have him last year. They lost Scott and their best WR. They can run the ball but there are questions as to how well they will be able to pass this year. Defensively, they were awful last year and even if they are better I don't see how they will slow us down.
    That's a fair point, but the second year under a new coach usually means familiarity and general improvement if the coach is worth a shit. I say LIPO, we'll know more about Arizona and UW in a a few weeks.
    After non-conference play Arizona gave up 40ppg in its last 10 games. Even Colorado scored 31. Utah had 24. SteveSarkisianFS coached the worst game in human history last year.

    RichRod is a very good coach and is recruiting well but if you read between the lines of what he's said, it sounds like Matt Scott was the John Ross of Arizona last year. With a green or average QB they probably win 4-5 games and not 8. Its possible they could improve on defense but it not show because the offense takes a step back without Scott. Maybe the defense gives up 33ppg instead of 40. In any event, I just don't see Arizona having the D to slow this offense down.
    Washington is the only team in America that was allowed to improve this offseason.

    Simple fact.
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295


    Fuck off sven. If uw is 4-0 after 5 weeks they could even crack the top 10, deservedly or not

    Stop being a Doog. We can worry about what UW deserves to be ranked (if it all) after the three bye weeks end and UW finally plays its second game of the season that is already over.
    Oh, Im definitely LIPO. Its just cool to see UW get national coverage and exposure that isnt from being on the receiving end of a plunger
    No argument on that. Earned pub from using the plunger >>>> offseason FREE PUB!
    Should plunger the next three teams. Abundance.
    Plungering BYE, @B1G fucking dreckfest BYE, and Big Sky fucking dreckfest BYE is a given.

    The season that is already over starts in October
    If we are as good as we showed in the first game then we should have little problem with Arizona at home.
    The same Arizona team that skullfucked UW last year? Don't sleep on them. They'll be 3-0 coming into Husky Stadium also.
    2007- UW at home blows game, close loss
    2008- Skullfucking
    2009-UW lucky win at home
    2010- Skullfucking
    2011-UW 12 point win at home
    2012-Skullfucking
    2013- See where this is going?

    Arizona will have a weaker pass offense and their defense was the worst in league last year. Not sleeping on them but if our offense gets on a roll, it should go for 50+.
    Last year was the first year of the Rich Rod era at Arizona. I expect them to be better than the team that skull fucked UW for 52 points last year. The Huskies will be in a much better position since the game is at Husky Stadium, but I think I'd wait a few weeks, LIPO, before assigning an automatic "W" to this one.

    After that comes three skull fuckers in a row and there could be some bare pickling of the left and right eye sockets. @Stanford they face the most physical team they'll face all year barring some freakish tear in the space time continuum that lands them in a BCS Bowel. Then @Home vs "nine skull fuckings in a row" Oregon, and onto "winners of seven in a row " @ASU. See where I'm going with this? LIPO is the acronym of the year.
    How is Arizona going to be better without Matt Scott? Even Rich Rod has said how lucky they were to have him last year. They lost Scott and their best WR. They can run the ball but there are questions as to how well they will be able to pass this year. Defensively, they were awful last year and even if they are better I don't see how they will slow us down.
    That's a fair point, but the second year under a new coach usually means familiarity and general improvement if the coach is worth a shit. I say LIPO, we'll know more about Arizona and UW in a a few weeks.
    After non-conference play Arizona gave up 40ppg in its last 10 games. Even Colorado scored 31. Utah had 24. SteveSarkisianFS coached the worst game in human history last year.

    RichRod is a very good coach and is recruiting well but if you read between the lines of what he's said, it sounds like Matt Scott was the John Ross of Arizona last year. With a green or average QB they probably win 4-5 games and not 8. Its possible they could improve on defense but it not show because the offense takes a step back without Scott. Maybe the defense gives up 33ppg instead of 40. In any event, I just don't see Arizona having the D to slow this offense down.
    Washington is the only team in America that was allowed to improve this offseason.

    Simple fact.
    The smart money was always on Boise.
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    LIPO or LEAVE!
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Fuck off sven. If uw is 4-0 after 5 weeks they could even crack the top 10, deservedly or not

    Stop being a Doog. We can worry about what UW deserves to be ranked (if it all) after the three bye weeks end and UW finally plays its second game of the season that is already over.
    Oh, Im definitely LIPO. Its just cool to see UW get national coverage and exposure that isnt from being on the receiving end of a plunger
    No argument on that. Earned pub from using the plunger >>>> offseason FREE PUB!
    Should plunger the next three teams. Abundance.
    Plungering BYE, @B1G fucking dreckfest BYE, and Big Sky fucking dreckfest BYE is a given.

    The season that is already over starts in October
    If we are as good as we showed in the first game then we should have little problem with Arizona at home.
    The same Arizona team that skullfucked UW last year? Don't sleep on them. They'll be 3-0 coming into Husky Stadium also.
    2007- UW at home blows game, close loss
    2008- Skullfucking
    2009-UW lucky win at home
    2010- Skullfucking
    2011-UW 12 point win at home
    2012-Skullfucking
    2013- See where this is going?

    Arizona will have a weaker pass offense and their defense was the worst in league last year. Not sleeping on them but if our offense gets on a roll, it should go for 50+.
    Mike Stoops was the Arizona coach in 2007, 2009, and 2011.

    Hope this helps.
    He had been fired by the 2011 game actually. Proving their A.D. is better at his job than Pool Boy since he fired a terrible coach in the middle of the year.
    Whatever.
    BURN!
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,354 Founders Club
    edited September 2013


    Fuck off sven. If uw is 4-0 after 5 weeks they could even crack the top 10, deservedly or not

    Stop being a Doog. We can worry about what UW deserves to be ranked (if it all) after the three bye weeks end and UW finally plays its second game of the season that is already over.
    Oh, Im definitely LIPO. Its just cool to see UW get national coverage and exposure that isnt from being on the receiving end of a plunger
    No argument on that. Earned pub from using the plunger >>>> offseason FREE PUB!
    Should plunger the next three teams. Abundance.
    Plungering BYE, @B1G fucking dreckfest BYE, and Big Sky fucking dreckfest BYE is a given.

    The season that is already over starts in October
    If we are as good as we showed in the first game then we should have little problem with Arizona at home.
    The same Arizona team that skullfucked UW last year? Don't sleep on them. They'll be 3-0 coming into Husky Stadium also.
    2007- UW at home blows game, close loss
    2008- Skullfucking
    2009-UW lucky win at home
    2010- Skullfucking
    2011-UW 12 point win at home
    2012-Skullfucking
    2013- See where this is going?

    Arizona will have a weaker pass offense and their defense was the worst in league last year. Not sleeping on them but if our offense gets on a roll, it should go for 50+.
    Last year was the first year of the Rich Rod era at Arizona. I expect them to be better than the team that skull fucked UW for 52 points last year. The Huskies will be in a much better position since the game is at Husky Stadium, but I think I'd wait a few weeks, LIPO, before assigning an automatic "W" to this one.

    After that comes three skull fuckers in a row and there could be some bare pickling of the left and right eye sockets. @Stanford they face the most physical team they'll face all year barring some freakish tear in the space time continuum that lands them in a BCS Bowel. Then @Home vs "nine skull fuckings in a row" Oregon, and onto "winners of seven in a row " @ASU. See where I'm going with this? LIPO is the acronym of the year.
    How is Arizona going to be better without Matt Scott? Even Rich Rod has said how lucky they were to have him last year. They lost Scott and their best WR. They can run the ball but there are questions as to how well they will be able to pass this year. Defensively, they were awful last year and even if they are better I don't see how they will slow us down.
    That's a fair point, but the second year under a new coach usually means familiarity and general improvement if the coach is worth a shit. I say LIPO, we'll know more about Arizona and UW in a a few weeks.
    After non-conference play Arizona gave up 40ppg in its last 10 games. Even Colorado scored 31. Utah had 24. SteveSarkisianFS coached the worst game in human history last year.

    RichRod is a very good coach and is recruiting well but if you read between the lines of what he's said, it sounds like Matt Scott was the John Ross of Arizona last year. With a green or average QB they probably win 4-5 games and not 8. Its possible they could improve on defense but it not show because the offense takes a step back without Scott. Maybe the defense gives up 33ppg instead of 40. In any event, I just don't see Arizona having the D to slow this offense down.
    Washington is the only team in America that was allowed to improve this offseason.

    Simple fact.
    The smart money was always on Boise.
    And first games of the season against Boise State always set the standard.

    LIPO