UW 20th in AP poll
Comments
-
Whatever.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He had been fired by the 2011 game actually. Proving their A.D. is better at his job than Pool Boy since he fired a terrible coach in the middle of the year.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Mike Stoops was the Arizona coach in 2007, 2009, and 2011.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
2007- UW at home blows game, close lossTierbsHsotBoobs said:
The same Arizona team that skullfucked UW last year? Don't sleep on them. They'll be 3-0 coming into Husky Stadium also.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
If we are as good as we showed in the first game then we should have little problem with Arizona at home.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Plungering BYE, @B1G fucking dreckfest BYE, and Big Sky fucking dreckfest BYE is a given.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Should plunger the next three teams. Abundance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
No argument on that. Earned pub from using the plunger >>>> offseason FREE PUB!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oh, Im definitely LIPO. Its just cool to see UW get national coverage and exposure that isnt from being on the receiving end of a plungerTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stop being a Doog. We can worry about what UW deserves to be ranked (if it all) after the three bye weeks end and UW finally plays its second game of the season that is already over.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Fuck off sven. If uw is 4-0 after 5 weeks they could even crack the top 10, deservedly or not
The season that is already over starts in October
2008- Skullfucking
2009-UW lucky win at home
2010- Skullfucking
2011-UW 12 point win at home
2012-Skullfucking
2013- See where this is going?
Arizona will have a weaker pass offense and their defense was the worst in league last year. Not sleeping on them but if our offense gets on a roll, it should go for 50+.
Hope this helps. -
That's a fair point, but the second year under a new coach usually means familiarity and general improvement if the coach is worth a shit. I say LIPO, we'll know more about Arizona and UW in a a few weeks.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
How is Arizona going to be better without Matt Scott? Even Rich Rod has said how lucky they were to have him last year. They lost Scott and their best WR. They can run the ball but there are questions as to how well they will be able to pass this year. Defensively, they were awful last year and even if they are better I don't see how they will slow us down.Southerndawg said:
Last year was the first year of the Rich Rod era at Arizona. I expect them to be better than the team that skull fucked UW for 52 points last year. The Huskies will be in a much better position since the game is at Husky Stadium, but I think I'd wait a few weeks, LIPO, before assigning an automatic "W" to this one.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
2007- UW at home blows game, close lossTierbsHsotBoobs said:
The same Arizona team that skullfucked UW last year? Don't sleep on them. They'll be 3-0 coming into Husky Stadium also.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
If we are as good as we showed in the first game then we should have little problem with Arizona at home.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Plungering BYE, @B1G fucking dreckfest BYE, and Big Sky fucking dreckfest BYE is a given.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Should plunger the next three teams. Abundance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
No argument on that. Earned pub from using the plunger >>>> offseason FREE PUB!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oh, Im definitely LIPO. Its just cool to see UW get national coverage and exposure that isnt from being on the receiving end of a plungerTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stop being a Doog. We can worry about what UW deserves to be ranked (if it all) after the three bye weeks end and UW finally plays its second game of the season that is already over.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Fuck off sven. If uw is 4-0 after 5 weeks they could even crack the top 10, deservedly or not
The season that is already over starts in October
2008- Skullfucking
2009-UW lucky win at home
2010- Skullfucking
2011-UW 12 point win at home
2012-Skullfucking
2013- See where this is going?
Arizona will have a weaker pass offense and their defense was the worst in league last year. Not sleeping on them but if our offense gets on a roll, it should go for 50+.
After that comes three skull fuckers in a row and there could be some bare pickling of the left and right eye sockets. @Stanford they face the most physical team they'll face all year barring some freakish tear in the space time continuum that lands them in a BCS Bowel. Then @Home vs "nine skull fuckings in a row" Oregon, and onto "winners of seven in a row " @ASU. See where I'm going with this? LIPO is the acronym of the year.
-
After non-conference play Arizona gave up 40ppg in its last 10 games. Even Colorado scored 31. Utah had 24. SteveSarkisianFS coached the worst game in human history last year.Southerndawg said:
That's a fair point, but the second year under a new coach usually means familiarity and general improvement if the coach is worth a shit. I say LIPO, we'll know more about Arizona and UW in a a few weeks.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
How is Arizona going to be better without Matt Scott? Even Rich Rod has said how lucky they were to have him last year. They lost Scott and their best WR. They can run the ball but there are questions as to how well they will be able to pass this year. Defensively, they were awful last year and even if they are better I don't see how they will slow us down.Southerndawg said:
Last year was the first year of the Rich Rod era at Arizona. I expect them to be better than the team that skull fucked UW for 52 points last year. The Huskies will be in a much better position since the game is at Husky Stadium, but I think I'd wait a few weeks, LIPO, before assigning an automatic "W" to this one.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
2007- UW at home blows game, close lossTierbsHsotBoobs said:
The same Arizona team that skullfucked UW last year? Don't sleep on them. They'll be 3-0 coming into Husky Stadium also.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
If we are as good as we showed in the first game then we should have little problem with Arizona at home.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Plungering BYE, @B1G fucking dreckfest BYE, and Big Sky fucking dreckfest BYE is a given.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Should plunger the next three teams. Abundance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
No argument on that. Earned pub from using the plunger >>>> offseason FREE PUB!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oh, Im definitely LIPO. Its just cool to see UW get national coverage and exposure that isnt from being on the receiving end of a plungerTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stop being a Doog. We can worry about what UW deserves to be ranked (if it all) after the three bye weeks end and UW finally plays its second game of the season that is already over.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Fuck off sven. If uw is 4-0 after 5 weeks they could even crack the top 10, deservedly or not
The season that is already over starts in October
2008- Skullfucking
2009-UW lucky win at home
2010- Skullfucking
2011-UW 12 point win at home
2012-Skullfucking
2013- See where this is going?
Arizona will have a weaker pass offense and their defense was the worst in league last year. Not sleeping on them but if our offense gets on a roll, it should go for 50+.
After that comes three skull fuckers in a row and there could be some bare pickling of the left and right eye sockets. @Stanford they face the most physical team they'll face all year barring some freakish tear in the space time continuum that lands them in a BCS Bowel. Then @Home vs "nine skull fuckings in a row" Oregon, and onto "winners of seven in a row " @ASU. See where I'm going with this? LIPO is the acronym of the year.
RichRod is a very good coach and is recruiting well but if you read between the lines of what he's said, it sounds like Matt Scott was the John Ross of Arizona last year. With a green or average QB they probably win 4-5 games and not 8. Its possible they could improve on defense but it not show because the offense takes a step back without Scott. Maybe the defense gives up 33ppg instead of 40. In any event, I just don't see Arizona having the D to slow this offense down. -
Washington is the only team in America that was allowed to improve this offseason.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
After non-conference play Arizona gave up 40ppg in its last 10 games. Even Colorado scored 31. Utah had 24. SteveSarkisianFS coached the worst game in human history last year.Southerndawg said:
That's a fair point, but the second year under a new coach usually means familiarity and general improvement if the coach is worth a shit. I say LIPO, we'll know more about Arizona and UW in a a few weeks.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
How is Arizona going to be better without Matt Scott? Even Rich Rod has said how lucky they were to have him last year. They lost Scott and their best WR. They can run the ball but there are questions as to how well they will be able to pass this year. Defensively, they were awful last year and even if they are better I don't see how they will slow us down.Southerndawg said:
Last year was the first year of the Rich Rod era at Arizona. I expect them to be better than the team that skull fucked UW for 52 points last year. The Huskies will be in a much better position since the game is at Husky Stadium, but I think I'd wait a few weeks, LIPO, before assigning an automatic "W" to this one.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
2007- UW at home blows game, close lossTierbsHsotBoobs said:
The same Arizona team that skullfucked UW last year? Don't sleep on them. They'll be 3-0 coming into Husky Stadium also.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
If we are as good as we showed in the first game then we should have little problem with Arizona at home.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Plungering BYE, @B1G fucking dreckfest BYE, and Big Sky fucking dreckfest BYE is a given.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Should plunger the next three teams. Abundance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
No argument on that. Earned pub from using the plunger >>>> offseason FREE PUB!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oh, Im definitely LIPO. Its just cool to see UW get national coverage and exposure that isnt from being on the receiving end of a plungerTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stop being a Doog. We can worry about what UW deserves to be ranked (if it all) after the three bye weeks end and UW finally plays its second game of the season that is already over.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Fuck off sven. If uw is 4-0 after 5 weeks they could even crack the top 10, deservedly or not
The season that is already over starts in October
2008- Skullfucking
2009-UW lucky win at home
2010- Skullfucking
2011-UW 12 point win at home
2012-Skullfucking
2013- See where this is going?
Arizona will have a weaker pass offense and their defense was the worst in league last year. Not sleeping on them but if our offense gets on a roll, it should go for 50+.
After that comes three skull fuckers in a row and there could be some bare pickling of the left and right eye sockets. @Stanford they face the most physical team they'll face all year barring some freakish tear in the space time continuum that lands them in a BCS Bowel. Then @Home vs "nine skull fuckings in a row" Oregon, and onto "winners of seven in a row " @ASU. See where I'm going with this? LIPO is the acronym of the year.
RichRod is a very good coach and is recruiting well but if you read between the lines of what he's said, it sounds like Matt Scott was the John Ross of Arizona last year. With a green or average QB they probably win 4-5 games and not 8. Its possible they could improve on defense but it not show because the offense takes a step back without Scott. Maybe the defense gives up 33ppg instead of 40. In any event, I just don't see Arizona having the D to slow this offense down.
Simple fact.
-
The smart money was always on Boise.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Washington is the only team in America that was allowed to improve this offseason.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
After non-conference play Arizona gave up 40ppg in its last 10 games. Even Colorado scored 31. Utah had 24. SteveSarkisianFS coached the worst game in human history last year.Southerndawg said:
That's a fair point, but the second year under a new coach usually means familiarity and general improvement if the coach is worth a shit. I say LIPO, we'll know more about Arizona and UW in a a few weeks.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
How is Arizona going to be better without Matt Scott? Even Rich Rod has said how lucky they were to have him last year. They lost Scott and their best WR. They can run the ball but there are questions as to how well they will be able to pass this year. Defensively, they were awful last year and even if they are better I don't see how they will slow us down.Southerndawg said:
Last year was the first year of the Rich Rod era at Arizona. I expect them to be better than the team that skull fucked UW for 52 points last year. The Huskies will be in a much better position since the game is at Husky Stadium, but I think I'd wait a few weeks, LIPO, before assigning an automatic "W" to this one.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
2007- UW at home blows game, close lossTierbsHsotBoobs said:
The same Arizona team that skullfucked UW last year? Don't sleep on them. They'll be 3-0 coming into Husky Stadium also.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
If we are as good as we showed in the first game then we should have little problem with Arizona at home.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Plungering BYE, @B1G fucking dreckfest BYE, and Big Sky fucking dreckfest BYE is a given.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Should plunger the next three teams. Abundance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
No argument on that. Earned pub from using the plunger >>>> offseason FREE PUB!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oh, Im definitely LIPO. Its just cool to see UW get national coverage and exposure that isnt from being on the receiving end of a plungerTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stop being a Doog. We can worry about what UW deserves to be ranked (if it all) after the three bye weeks end and UW finally plays its second game of the season that is already over.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Fuck off sven. If uw is 4-0 after 5 weeks they could even crack the top 10, deservedly or not
The season that is already over starts in October
2008- Skullfucking
2009-UW lucky win at home
2010- Skullfucking
2011-UW 12 point win at home
2012-Skullfucking
2013- See where this is going?
Arizona will have a weaker pass offense and their defense was the worst in league last year. Not sleeping on them but if our offense gets on a roll, it should go for 50+.
After that comes three skull fuckers in a row and there could be some bare pickling of the left and right eye sockets. @Stanford they face the most physical team they'll face all year barring some freakish tear in the space time continuum that lands them in a BCS Bowel. Then @Home vs "nine skull fuckings in a row" Oregon, and onto "winners of seven in a row " @ASU. See where I'm going with this? LIPO is the acronym of the year.
RichRod is a very good coach and is recruiting well but if you read between the lines of what he's said, it sounds like Matt Scott was the John Ross of Arizona last year. With a green or average QB they probably win 4-5 games and not 8. Its possible they could improve on defense but it not show because the offense takes a step back without Scott. Maybe the defense gives up 33ppg instead of 40. In any event, I just don't see Arizona having the D to slow this offense down.
Simple fact. -
LIPO or LEAVE!
-
BURN!TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Whatever.He_Needs_More_Time said:
He had been fired by the 2011 game actually. Proving their A.D. is better at his job than Pool Boy since he fired a terrible coach in the middle of the year.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Mike Stoops was the Arizona coach in 2007, 2009, and 2011.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
2007- UW at home blows game, close lossTierbsHsotBoobs said:
The same Arizona team that skullfucked UW last year? Don't sleep on them. They'll be 3-0 coming into Husky Stadium also.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
If we are as good as we showed in the first game then we should have little problem with Arizona at home.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Plungering BYE, @B1G fucking dreckfest BYE, and Big Sky fucking dreckfest BYE is a given.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Should plunger the next three teams. Abundance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
No argument on that. Earned pub from using the plunger >>>> offseason FREE PUB!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oh, Im definitely LIPO. Its just cool to see UW get national coverage and exposure that isnt from being on the receiving end of a plungerTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stop being a Doog. We can worry about what UW deserves to be ranked (if it all) after the three bye weeks end and UW finally plays its second game of the season that is already over.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Fuck off sven. If uw is 4-0 after 5 weeks they could even crack the top 10, deservedly or not
The season that is already over starts in October
2008- Skullfucking
2009-UW lucky win at home
2010- Skullfucking
2011-UW 12 point win at home
2012-Skullfucking
2013- See where this is going?
Arizona will have a weaker pass offense and their defense was the worst in league last year. Not sleeping on them but if our offense gets on a roll, it should go for 50+.
Hope this helps. -
And first games of the season against Boise State always set the standard.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
The smart money was always on Boise.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Washington is the only team in America that was allowed to improve this offseason.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
After non-conference play Arizona gave up 40ppg in its last 10 games. Even Colorado scored 31. Utah had 24. SteveSarkisianFS coached the worst game in human history last year.Southerndawg said:
That's a fair point, but the second year under a new coach usually means familiarity and general improvement if the coach is worth a shit. I say LIPO, we'll know more about Arizona and UW in a a few weeks.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
How is Arizona going to be better without Matt Scott? Even Rich Rod has said how lucky they were to have him last year. They lost Scott and their best WR. They can run the ball but there are questions as to how well they will be able to pass this year. Defensively, they were awful last year and even if they are better I don't see how they will slow us down.Southerndawg said:
Last year was the first year of the Rich Rod era at Arizona. I expect them to be better than the team that skull fucked UW for 52 points last year. The Huskies will be in a much better position since the game is at Husky Stadium, but I think I'd wait a few weeks, LIPO, before assigning an automatic "W" to this one.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
2007- UW at home blows game, close lossTierbsHsotBoobs said:
The same Arizona team that skullfucked UW last year? Don't sleep on them. They'll be 3-0 coming into Husky Stadium also.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
If we are as good as we showed in the first game then we should have little problem with Arizona at home.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Plungering BYE, @B1G fucking dreckfest BYE, and Big Sky fucking dreckfest BYE is a given.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Should plunger the next three teams. Abundance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
No argument on that. Earned pub from using the plunger >>>> offseason FREE PUB!PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oh, Im definitely LIPO. Its just cool to see UW get national coverage and exposure that isnt from being on the receiving end of a plungerTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stop being a Doog. We can worry about what UW deserves to be ranked (if it all) after the three bye weeks end and UW finally plays its second game of the season that is already over.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Fuck off sven. If uw is 4-0 after 5 weeks they could even crack the top 10, deservedly or not
The season that is already over starts in October
2008- Skullfucking
2009-UW lucky win at home
2010- Skullfucking
2011-UW 12 point win at home
2012-Skullfucking
2013- See where this is going?
Arizona will have a weaker pass offense and their defense was the worst in league last year. Not sleeping on them but if our offense gets on a roll, it should go for 50+.
After that comes three skull fuckers in a row and there could be some bare pickling of the left and right eye sockets. @Stanford they face the most physical team they'll face all year barring some freakish tear in the space time continuum that lands them in a BCS Bowel. Then @Home vs "nine skull fuckings in a row" Oregon, and onto "winners of seven in a row " @ASU. See where I'm going with this? LIPO is the acronym of the year.
RichRod is a very good coach and is recruiting well but if you read between the lines of what he's said, it sounds like Matt Scott was the John Ross of Arizona last year. With a green or average QB they probably win 4-5 games and not 8. Its possible they could improve on defense but it not show because the offense takes a step back without Scott. Maybe the defense gives up 33ppg instead of 40. In any event, I just don't see Arizona having the D to slow this offense down.
Simple fact.
LIPO


