Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
PM to Boobielips
AtomicPiss
Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,817 
AtomicPiss
Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,817
Comments
Yes, I'm saying @DerekIsKim, no twisting necessary.
In the Low Countries, the schandstoel ("Chair of shame"), the kaak or schandpaal ("pole of shame", a simple type of pillory), the draaikooi were customary for adulteresses, and the schopstoel, a scaffolding from which one is kicked off to land in mud and dirt).
In the more extreme cases being subjected to verbal and physical abuse from the crowd, which could have serious consequences especially when the hands are not free to protect himself. Some sentences actually prescribe additional humiliation, such as shaving, or combine it with painful corporal punishments, see below.[1]
In Colonial America, common forms of public humiliation were the stocks and pillory, imported from Europe. Nearly every sizable town had such instruments of public humiliation, usually at the town square. Historic public humiliation displays can still be seen in the historic Virginia town of Colonial Williamsburg.
In pre–World War Japan, adulterers were publicly exposed purely to shame them.
In post-Colonial times, judicial use of public humiliation punishment has largely fallen out of favor since the practice is now considered cruel and unusual punishment, which is outlawed in the United States Constitution.[2]
In India, public humiliation (especially of women) is still practicised, often involving stripping and beating the victim. Reasons may include (real or alleged) murder, non-payment of dowry, witchcraft, or inter-caste marriages.[3]
In Siam, an adulteress was paraded with a hibiscus behind the ear. Thieves were tattooed on the face. Other criminals were paraded with a device made of woven cane on the forehead, or lengths of bamboo hung around the neck. Errant Brahmans had to wear a string of oversize beads.
Just like painful forms of corporal punishment, it has parallels in educational and other rather private punishments (but with some audience), in school or domestic disciplinary context, and as a rite of passage. Physical forms include being forced to wear some sign such as "donkey ears" (simulated in paper, as a sign one is—or at least behaved—proverbially stupid), wearing a dunce cap, having to stand, kneel or bend over in a corner, or repeatedly write something on a blackboard ("I will not spread rumors", for example). Here too different levels of physical discomfort can be added, such as having to hold heavy objects, go barefoot (see below) or kneel on an uneven surface. Like physical punishment and harsh hazing, these have become controversial in most modern societies, in many cases leading to legal restrictions and/or (sometimes voluntary) abolishment.
Having the head shaved can be a humiliating punishment prescribed in law,[4] but also something done as "mob justice" - a stark example of which was the thousands of European women who had their heads shaved in front of cheering crowds in the wake of World War II,[5][6] as punishment for associating with occupying Nazis during the war.
Forcing people to go barefoot has been used as a relatively effortless and more subtle form of humiliation in most past and present civilized cultures, primarily using the visual contrast to the standard form of appearance while also creating some level of physical discomfort. The exposure of bare feet often served as an indicator for imprisonment and slavery throughout ancient as well as modern history.[7] Even today prisoners officially have to go barefoot in many countries of the world and are also presented in court and showcased to the public unshod.[8][9][10][11][12][13][14] As shoes are commonly worn by all social classes since antiquity in most civilized societies, showcasing a captive to the public in bare feet traditionally symbolizes the person's loss of social standing and personal autonomy. It usually also causes a considerable degree of humiliation, as this noticeable detail typically sets the prisoner apart from spectators visually and demonstrates the person's vulnerability and general powerlessness.
Further means of public humiliation and degradation consist in forcing people to wear typifying clothes, which can be penitential garbs or prison uniforms.
Presenting arrestees or prisoners to the public in restraints (such as handcuffs, shackles or similar devices) also serves as a convenient method of public humiliation besides the primal security aspects. The effect is complemented by presenting the person in a prison uniform or similar clothing.
Corporal punishment[edit]
Public foot whipping in Iran
Public flagellation in Russia, 18th century.
Public flogging in Brazil, Jean-Baptiste Debret
Apart from specific methods essentially aiming at humiliation, several methods combine pain and humiliation or even death and humiliation. In some cases, pain or at least discomfort is insignificant or rather secondary to the humiliation.
Public punishment[edit]
The simplest is to administer painful corporal punishment in public - the major aim may be deterrence of potential offenders - so the public will witness the perpetrator's fear and agony. This can either take place in a town square or other public gathering location such as a school, or take the form of a procession through the streets. This was not uncommon in the sentences to Staupenschlag (whipping or birching, generally on the bare buttocks) in various German-speaking states, till the 19th century. A naval equivalent was Flogging round the fleet on a raft taken from ship to ship for consecutive installments of a great total of lashes, that could even be lethal. In some countries the punishment of foot whipping is executed in public to this day.
The humiliation as well as degradation is generally intensified if the perpetrator is unclothed (partially or entirely) as the exposure leaves the person feeling vulnerable and helpless. A common and simple form of humiliating exposure consists in taking away a person's shoes and keeping him or her barefoot during corporal punishment or generally.
Further means of intensifying the public humiliation and degradation especially during punishment consist in forcing people to wear typifying clothes, which can be prison uniforms or in former times penitential garbs or rags, further incremented in combination with an exposure aspect such as bare feet.
Even when not strictly public, humiliation can still be a psychologically "painful" aspect of punishment because of the presence of witnessing peers (such as fellow prisoners), staff or other onlookers, or simply because the person administering the punishment is witnessing the reactions of the culprit. The loss of self-control in the presence of bystanders further increments the humiliating effect of the punishment significantly. This is also true for punishments in class and similar situations.
Crucifixion was used by the Romans to add public humiliation to a death penalty. Josephus describes how the Roman soldiers would crucify people naked, and using different tortuous positions as a way to further humiliate them. Crucified bodies were left to decay on the cross for weeks, and crows would come to feed on the corpses; this can be seen as post-mortem public humiliation. See also gibbeting.
Torture marks[edit]
The 1774 tarring and feathering of British customs agent John Malcolm soon after the Boston Tea Party
The humiliation can be extended; intentionally or not; by leaving visible marks, such as scars, notably on body parts that are normally left visible. This also serves as a virtually indelible criminal record. This can even be the main intention of the punishment, as in the case of scarifications, such as branding. It invariably is essential in forms of mutilation, such as ear cropping, though the functional loss is even greater; pain may even be intentionally minimized as in the case of surgical amputation, eliminating the risk of accidental death. Tarring and feathering also serves as means of extended humiliation.
See also[edit]
How do you think China would have reacted to that?
Do you really think that we had the manpower to occupy the USSR and set up our own Democracy in an area so large, populated and far away.
If we do what you think we should have, The nuclear arsenal would have been commandeered by a slew of Milosevic like crackpots and the Earth would probably be a nuke wasteland now.
No we continued to do what knocked the wall down. Starve their Economy until they do what we want them to.
Alama mateso [hariri]
Tarring 1774 na feathering ya mila British kikali John Malcolm mara baada ya Boston Tea Party
udhalilishaji inaweza kupanuliwa; makusudi au si; kwa kuacha alama inayoonekana, kama vile makovu, hasa juu ya sehemu za mwili ambazo ni kawaida kushoto inayoonekana. Hii pia hutumika kama karibu indelible rekodi ya uhalifu. Hii inaweza hata kuwa na nia kuu ya adhabu, kama katika kesi ya scarifications, kama vile branding. Ni invariably ni muhimu katika aina ya ukeketaji, kama vile sikio mseto, ingawa hasara kazi ni hata zaidi; maumivu inaweza hata kuwa makusudi kupunguzwa kama katika kesi ya amputation upasuaji, kuondoa hatari ya kifo ajali. Tarring na feathering pia hutumika kama njia ya udhalilishaji kupanuliwa.
au kurudia kuandika kitu kwenye ubao ("Mimi si kueneza uvumi", kwa mfano). Hapa ngazi mbalimbali pia ya usumbufu wa kimwili unaweza kuongezwa, kama vile kuwa na kushikilia vitu vizito, kwenda hana viatu (tazama chini) au kupiga magoti juu ya uso kutofautiana. Kama adhabu ya kimwili na wakali hazing, hawa wamekuwa utata katika jamii nyingi za kisasa, katika kesi nyingi na kusababisha vikwazo vya kisheria na / au (wakati mwingine kwa hiari) Kufutwa.
Kuwa na kichwa kunyoa inaweza kuwa adhabu ya kudhalilisha ilivyoagizwa katika sheria, [4] lakini pia kitu kufanyika kama "watu kujichukulia sheria mkononi" - mfano kabisa wa uliokuwa maelfu ya wanawake Ulaya waliokuwa na vichwa vyao kunyoa mbele ya umati wa watu cheering katika wake ya Vita Kuu ya II, [5] [6] kama adhabu kwa kujihusisha na Nazis wanaomiliki wakati wa vita.
Kulazimisha watu kwenda hana viatu imekuwa kutumika kama kiasi effortless na mwerevu aina ya udhalilishaji katika maeneo mengi zamani na sasa tamaduni kistaarabu, hasa kwa kutumia kulinganisha Visual aina ya hali ya kuonekana wakati pia kujenga baadhi ya kiwango cha usumbufu wa kimwili. yatokanayo wa miguu wazi mara nyingi aliwahi kuwa kiashiria kifungo na utumwa katika kale pamoja na historia ya kisasa. [7] Hata leo wafungwa rasmi kwenda hana viatu katika nchi nyingi duniani na pia aliwasilisha mahakamani na yaliyohusisha kwa umma unshod. [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] Kama viatu ni kawaida huvaliwa na madaraja yote ya kijamii tangu zamani katika jamii nyingi kistaarabu, showcasing mateka kwa umma katika miguu wazi jadi mfano hasara ya mtu wa msimamo wa kijamii na uhuru binafsi. Ni kawaida pia husababisha shahada kikubwa cha udhalilishaji, kama hii undani liko kawaida seti mfungwa mbali na watazamaji kuibua na inaonyesha mazingira magumu ya mtu na mkuu kukosekana kwa uwezo.
Njia zaidi ya udhalilishaji wa umma na uharibifu wa wajumbe katika kulazimisha watu kuvaa nguo ikionyesha mfano, ambayo inaweza kuwa garbs penitential au sare gerezani.
Akiwasilisha arrestees au wafungwa kwa umma katika vizuizi (kama vile pingu, pingu au vifaa kama hiyo) pia hutumika kama njia rahisi ya udhalilishaji wa umma badala ya masuala primal usalama. athari ni kompletteras kuwasilisha mtu katika sare gerezani au nguo kama hiyo.
Adhabu ya viboko [hariri]
Mguu wa Umma kuchapwa viboko katika Iran
Flagellation umma nchini Urusi, karne ya 18.
Kupigwa umma nchini Brazil, Jean-Baptiste Debret
Mbali na mbinu maalum kimsingi kwa lengo la udhalilishaji, mbinu kadhaa kuchanganya maumivu na udhalilishaji au hata kifo na udhalilishaji. Katika kesi baadhi, maumivu au angalau usumbufu ni insignificant au tuseme
Adhabu ya umma [hariri]
rahisi ni kusimamia chungu adhabu ya viboko hadharani - lengo kuu inaweza kuwa na kuzuia makosa yasitendeke ya wahalifu uwezo - hivyo umma kushuhudia hofu wahusika na uchungu. Hii inaweza aidha kuchukua nafasi katika mraba mji au nyingine mkusanyiko umma vya eneo kama vile shule, au kuchukua fomu ya maandamano katika mitaa. Hii ilikuwa ni jambo la kawaida katika hukumu kwa Staupenschlag (kuchapwa viboko au birching, kwa ujumla kwenye makalio wazi) katika mataifa mbalimbali Ujerumani-akizungumza, mpaka karne ya 19. sawa jeshi la maji ilikuwa kupigwa pande zote meli juu ya raft kuchukuliwa kutoka meli kwa meli kwa ajili ya awamu mfululizo wa jumla kubwa ya viboko, ambayo inaweza hata kuwa kifo. Katika baadhi ya nchi adhabu ya kuchapwa viboko mguu ni kunyongwa hadharani hata leo.
udhalilishaji ikiwa ni pamoja na uharibifu wa ujumla ulizidi kama mhusika ni uchi (sehemu au kabisa) kama yatokanayo majani mtu hisia katika mazingira magumu na wanyonge. kawaida na rahisi fomu ya yatokanayo kufedhehesha yamo katika kuchukua mbali viatu ya mtu na kuweka naye au hana viatu yake wakati wa adhabu ya viboko au kwa ujumla.
Njia zaidi ya kuongeza udhalilishaji wa umma na uharibifu hasa wakati wa adhabu na wajumbe katika kulazimisha watu kuvaa nguo ikionyesha mfano, ambayo inaweza kuwa sare gerezani au katika nyakati za zamani garbs penitential au mbovu, zaidi incremented pamoja na kipengele yatokanayo kama vile miguu wazi.
Hata wakati si madhubuti umma, udhalilishaji bado anaweza kuwa kisaikolojia "chungu" kipengele cha adhabu kwa sababu ya kuwepo kwa kushuhudia wenzao (kama vile wafungwa wenzake), wafanyakazi au watazamaji wengine, au tu kwa sababu mtu kuendesha adhabu ni kushuhudia athari za mhalifu. upotevu wa kiasi katika uwepo wa watu waliokuwa pale zaidi nyongeza athari kufedhehesha ya adhabu kwa kiasi kikubwa. Hii pia ni kweli kwa adhabu darasani na hali kama hizo.
Kusulibiwa ilitumiwa na Warumi kuongeza udhalilishaji umma ili hukumu ya kifo. Josephus anaelezea jinsi askari wa Kirumi bila misalabani watu uchi, na kwa kutumia nyadhifa mbalimbali tortuous kama njia ya zaidi kumfedhehesha kwao. Miili asulubiwe waliachwa kuoza juu ya msalaba kwa muda wa wiki, na jogoo atakuja kulisha juu maiti; hii inaweza kuonekana kama post-mortem udhalilishaji wa umma. Tazama pia gibbeting.
Alama mateso [hariri]
Tarring 1774 na feathering ya mila British kikali John Malcolm mara baada ya Boston Tea Party
udhalilishaji inaweza kupanuliwa; makusudi au si; kwa kuacha alama inayoonekana, kama vile makovu, hasa juu ya sehemu za mwili ambazo ni kawaida kushoto inayoonekana. Hii pia hutumika kama karibu indelible rekodi ya uhalifu. Hii inaweza hata kuwa na nia kuu ya adhabu, kama katika kesi ya scarifications, kama vile branding. Ni invariably ni muhimu katika aina ya ukeketaji, kama vile sikio mseto, ingawa hasara kazi ni hata zaidi; maumivu inaweza hata kuwa makusudi kupunguzwa kama katika kesi ya amputation upasuaji, kuondoa hatari ya kifo ajali. Tarring na feathering pia hutumika kama njia ya udhalilishaji kupanuliwa.
kutomba mbali
(Also, I need 10 gallons of premium and my windshield washed)
.