sadly, this season does indeed, appear to be over
Comments
-
Chance of winning the conference 0.2.
-
-
Beat WHOREGON. Nothing else matters!
-
-
We're expected to lose against Cal and Utah at home?
Fire everyone. -
61% chance to beat Utah State
FML -
0% at winning out. Does that mean we have a greater chance at losing out?
-
Yes.Doogles said:0% at winning out. Does that mean we have a greater chance at losing out?
-
I really can't wrap my head around how the over/under for UW wins is 4. Really? Fucking 4?
TSIO, no QB, yadda yadda yadda...If we can't get to a shit bowl this year i'll be pissed. Take Utah St. they are a mid major team that has made some noise the past few years, but similar to Ty beating Boise that's a game Pete needs to win. The only way I see us hitting 4 wins is by dropping games like that.
Do we really believe a Petersen coached team is going to drop 7 straight like the metrics predict? I just can't see it. I know we're a year away, but the nucleus of a 4 win team doesn't just win the fucking Pac the following year. -
that NEVER! would have happened if Sark was here.whatshouldicareabout said:We're expected to lose against Cal and Utah at home?
Fire everyone. -
We have a better head coach than 90% of our scheduleDoogles said:I really can't wrap my head around how the over/under for UW wins is 4. Really? Fucking 4?
TSIO, no QB, yadda yadda yadda...If we can't get to a shit bowl this year i'll be pissed. Take Utah St. they are a mid major team that has made some noise the past few years, but similar to Ty beating Boise that's a game Pete needs to win. The only way I see us hitting 4 wins is by dropping games like that.
Do we really believe a Petersen coached team is going to drop 7 straight like the metrics predict? I just can't see it. I know we're a year away, but the nucleus of a 4 win team doesn't just win the fucking Pac the following year.
And more talent than 65% of our schedule
but we are going to suck and win 4 games, yep.
-
like the Oregon St. game?
-
We better win more than 4, but I'm not sure about the coach and talent part. You gotta prove it, not rest on past laurels and recruiting rankings. That's AuburnDawg go to analysis.Gladstone said:
We have a better head coach than 90% of our scheduleDoogles said:I really can't wrap my head around how the over/under for UW wins is 4. Really? Fucking 4?
TSIO, no QB, yadda yadda yadda...If we can't get to a shit bowl this year i'll be pissed. Take Utah St. they are a mid major team that has made some noise the past few years, but similar to Ty beating Boise that's a game Pete needs to win. The only way I see us hitting 4 wins is by dropping games like that.
Do we really believe a Petersen coached team is going to drop 7 straight like the metrics predict? I just can't see it. I know we're a year away, but the nucleus of a 4 win team doesn't just win the fucking Pac the following year.
And more talent than 65% of our schedule
but we are going to suck and win 4 games, yep. -
The over/under is not "4".Doogles said:I really can't wrap my head around how the over/under for UW wins is 4. Really? Fucking 4?
TSIO, no QB, yadda yadda yadda...If we can't get to a shit bowl this year i'll be pissed. Take Utah St. they are a mid major team that has made some noise the past few years, but similar to Ty beating Boise that's a game Pete needs to win. The only way I see us hitting 4 wins is by dropping games like that.
Do we really believe a Petersen coached team is going to drop 7 straight like the metrics predict? I just can't see it. I know we're a year away, but the nucleus of a 4 win team doesn't just win the fucking Pac the following year. -
These people have obviously never heard of BBK!!!!
Seriously though... this will never happen. We win 6 at a minimum. I don't understand any logic to the contrary: Sac St, Utah State, Utah, Cal, WSU, Oregon St (though Andersen is a fucking good coach) or Arizona. The rest, who the fuck knows, but we are not losing 7 games. No fucking way.
If we do we should seriously just stop playing football. -
These 7 plus Boise State. Winning 6 of those 8 isn't too much to ask even with this shitty roster.Dennis_DeYoung said:These people have obviously never heard of BBK!!!!
Seriously though... this will never happen. We win 6 at a minimum. I don't understand any logic to the contrary: Sac St, Utah State, Utah, Cal, WSU, Oregon St (though Andersen is a fucking good coach) or Arizona. The rest, who the fuck knows, but we are not losing 7 games. No fucking way.
If we do we should seriously just stop playing football. -
I don't think the roster is so much shitty as it's awkward. With Sark's amazing 2012 recruiting class, we basically skipped a year in the program where we would have RS-Jrs and Srs playing for us. So, we have a lot of holes that will be occupied by people who I'm sure will be really good at some point, but are too inexperienced to be great.RoadDawg55 said:
These 7 plus Boise State. Winning 6 of those 8 isn't too much to ask even with this shitty roster.Dennis_DeYoung said:These people have obviously never heard of BBK!!!!
Seriously though... this will never happen. We win 6 at a minimum. I don't understand any logic to the contrary: Sac St, Utah State, Utah, Cal, WSU, Oregon St (though Andersen is a fucking good coach) or Arizona. The rest, who the fuck knows, but we are not losing 7 games. No fucking way.
If we do we should seriously just stop playing football.
QB: I have no fucking idea.
RB: There's talent there, it just needs to develop.
WR: Lots of young talent in my opinion.
TE: Very talented, needs a lot more experience.
OL: Absolute horse shit in the upper classes.
DL: Lots of talent, just needs to improve. The only reason people haven't played is we had good players (as its supposed to be).
LB: Middling talent, but enough.
DB: Good bunch of talent.
I doubt we lose 7. I will say this, though... we are a lot closer to breaking through to 9 wins than we are to falling through to 9 losses. If Feeney, Mathis and Qualls all develop like our guys did last year, If Baker and Jones continue to improve, we could have a really good defense again.
If Pettis and Lenius develop in a serious way, they could both be outstanding.
It's a lot of ifs... my pessimism for this team is really only centered around Babushka. If we had an OC I believed in, I would think 9 wins was inevitable. -
Y'all shleep on Cal tho...
-
I don't think the talent is that bad either. It's somewhere in the middle of the conference, with maybe the worst starting QB (hopefully not) in the conference and Babushka/Pete. Pete hasn't had a really good offense since Kellen Moore left. We saw the 38-6 plungering and Boise actually had some pretty good talent on that offense, including a couple NFL players.Dennis_DeYoung said:
I don't think the roster is so much shitty as it's awkward. With Sark's amazing 2012 recruiting class, we basically skipped a year in the program where we would have RS-Jrs and Srs playing for us. So, we have a lot of holes that will be occupied by people who I'm sure will be really good at some point, but are too inexperienced to be great.RoadDawg55 said:
These 7 plus Boise State. Winning 6 of those 8 isn't too much to ask even with this shitty roster.Dennis_DeYoung said:These people have obviously never heard of BBK!!!!
Seriously though... this will never happen. We win 6 at a minimum. I don't understand any logic to the contrary: Sac St, Utah State, Utah, Cal, WSU, Oregon St (though Andersen is a fucking good coach) or Arizona. The rest, who the fuck knows, but we are not losing 7 games. No fucking way.
If we do we should seriously just stop playing football.
QB: I have no fucking idea.
RB: There's talent there, it just needs to develop.
WR: Lots of young talent in my opinion.
TE: Very talented, needs a lot more experience.
OL: Absolute horse shit in the upper classes.
DL: Lots of talent, just needs to improve. The only reason people haven't played is we had good players (as its supposed to be).
LB: Middling talent, but enough.
DB: Good bunch of talent.
I doubt we lose 7. I will say this, though... we are a lot closer to breaking through to 9 wins than we are to falling through to 9 losses. If Feeney, Mathis and Qualls all develop like our guys did last year, If Baker and Jones continue to improve, we could have a really good defense again.
If Pettis and Lenius develop in a serious way, they could both be outstanding.
It's a lot of ifs... my pessimism for this team is really only centered around Babushka. If we had an OC I believed in, I would think 9 wins was inevitable.
Kikaha and Shelton are huge losses, no matter how high you are on Mathis, Qualls, etc. I think it could be another year until the DL is good, although the young talent is exciting. I'm not really worried about the defense long term, but I'm not ready to say they will be good yet either. -
If Peterman is half the coach Kim is sure he isn't, he'll win at least 2 games he isn't supposed to.
-
Last I checked, Cal's defense would have a tuff time stopping a high school attackBallSacked said:Y'all shleep on Cal tho...
If we lose at home to Cal we are fucked.
Good thing it's not going to happen -
if petersen is the coach we all believe him to be. operative word being 'if'RoadDawg55 said:
We better win more than 4, but I'm not sure about the coach and talent part. You gotta prove it, not rest on past laurels and recruiting rankings.Gladstone said:
We have a better head coach than 90% of our scheduleDoogles said:I really can't wrap my head around how the over/under for UW wins is 4. Really? Fucking 4?
TSIO, no QB, yadda yadda yadda...If we can't get to a shit bowl this year i'll be pissed. Take Utah St. they are a mid major team that has made some noise the past few years, but similar to Ty beating Boise that's a game Pete needs to win. The only way I see us hitting 4 wins is by dropping games like that.
Do we really believe a Petersen coached team is going to drop 7 straight like the metrics predict? I just can't see it. I know we're a year away, but the nucleus of a 4 win team doesn't just win the fucking Pac the following year.
And more talent than 65% of our schedule
but we are going to suck and win 4 games, yep. -
I think "we" will start out 2-2 or 2-3, with a loss to Boise Cosmetology Institute (vomit), and finish up better (5-3). After this season, there's no more leniency. My friend said, in jest, that "Bill wants 10 wins" ...well yeah..at least every other year..
-
We'll beat Sac St, Utah St, WSU, and maybe Boise. We seem to have Cal and OSU's number, and we up our play against AZ no matter their talent. So at best we win 7. But we'll likely lose two of these games and win one we shouldn't, so I'll say the over/under is 5.5. Hell yeah that's better than 4.
-
You're right. UW has the offense that can take advantage of the Cal D. Slam dunk win quite honestly.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Last I checked, Cal's defense would have a tuff time stopping a high school attackBallSacked said:Y'all shleep on Cal tho...
If we lose at home to Cal we are fucked.
Good thing it's not going to happen
-
thanks ballbag for stating the obviousBallSacked said:
You're right. UW has the offense that can take advantage of the Cal D. Slam dunk win quite honestly.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Last I checked, Cal's defense would have a tuff time stopping a high school attackBallSacked said:Y'all shleep on Cal tho...
If we lose at home to Cal we are fucked.
Good thing it's not going to happen -
I don't underestimate cal at all. Goff is the best QB in the pac and has weapons.BallSacked said:
You're right. UW has the offense that can take advantage of the Cal D. Slam dunk win quite honestly.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Last I checked, Cal's defense would have a tuff time stopping a high school attackBallSacked said:Y'all shleep on Cal tho...
If we lose at home to Cal we are fucked.
Good thing it's not going to happen
We just have Cal's number. It's science. -
UW has the worst QB and OL position groups in the league. There is strength and depth everywhere else, but the two giant holes on offense will be difficult to hide. Seven wins.
-
Yes really 4. We are going to be disastrous on offense. Possibly worst in the countryDoogles said:I really can't wrap my head around how the over/under for UW wins is 4. Really? Fucking 4?
TSIO, no QB, yadda yadda yadda...If we can't get to a shit bowl this year i'll be pissed. Take Utah St. they are a mid major team that has made some noise the past few years, but similar to Ty beating Boise that's a game Pete needs to win. The only way I see us hitting 4 wins is by dropping games like that.
Do we really believe a Petersen coached team is going to drop 7 straight like the metrics predict? I just can't see it. I know we're a year away, but the nucleus of a 4 win team doesn't just win the fucking Pac the following year. -
We beat Cal in Berkeley last year like 38-7 with a fucking abortion of an offense.BallSacked said:
You're right. UW has the offense that can take advantage of the Cal D. Slam dunk win quite honestly.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Last I checked, Cal's defense would have a tuff time stopping a high school attackBallSacked said:Y'all shleep on Cal tho...
If we lose at home to Cal we are fucked.
Good thing it's not going to happen
Quite honestly you're retarded
