Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options
I keep hearing that Sark is an Offensive Genius and "one of the best play callers in the nation".
WhiskeyDawg
Member Posts: 406
I can see that for Chip Kelly. I can't see if for Sark. Seems average at best.
Is this kind of the same urban myths that were popular with Tyrone Willingham?
Is this kind of the same urban myths that were popular with Tyrone Willingham?
Comments
Doogs love to say he helped build SC's offense which is a total joke. He did nothing there and was only the OC for two years and the offense peaked when they kicked out Chow.
In 4 years he's had one good offense and it was only good because the bar wasn't high and because of, dare I say it, Ty's recruits....Polk, Kearse, Aguilar, and Kelemete who protected Price's blindside. It was talent and had nothing to do with coaching.
Wilcox looks at what he has and fits it to something appropriate. Sark tries to run a video game offense no matter who he has.
The fact is, if Sark was actually the OC (which he is) and not the HC....he's get fired by the HC.
Well, Ty lost a Rose bowl, but he had Walsh's 5th year seniors keeping him down.
Effen Media.
I wish I would have saved my old Earthlink email exchanges that he and I had. I would find glaring errors in his stories (i.e. Willingham's two RB victories, etc), "facts" and the trivia column he ran and correct him. It got to the point where he wanted to fight me! LOL On the reply I cc: his editor and he went ape shit and was freaking out that I did that. I responded with, check the professional tone of my emails, and then compare them to your tone, and who is the "professional" here? The editor sent me a real nice reply. Nice guy.