Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
If Cavs lose the series, will they give LeBron the finals MVP? This has only been done once, in 1969 with Jerry West, the first year they gave out the award I believe.
Curry has been very average at best, he currently has finals averages of 23.5ppg, 6.3apg, 5 turnovers per game, and shooting 41%.
LeBron's has finals averages of: 35.8ppg, 12rpg, 8.3apg, and shooting 38%.
I think if Curry plays just a little better for the remainder of the series, they probably give it to him. I also have a theory:
If LeBron continues to go nuts and Cavs lose in 6, they could give LeBron the MVP in front of Cleveland's crowd. Hard to imagine them giving LeBron finals MVP in GS if it goes to 7 and they lose.
-2 ·
Comments
That being said, if LBJ keeps his averages around that level, then it wouldn't shock me if he wins the MVP award. For what he is working with, pushing this series to at least 6 games is a testament to what he's done. The Cavs honestly had no business winning 2 games in this series.
It probably won't happen, because it is hard to imagine the NBA giving the hardware to a player on the losing team, but no one on GS really deserves it as of now. However, there is still at least two more games. If neither Iggy or Curry assert themselves, I could see LeBron getting it if they lose in 6. The irony there is that if they lose in 7, LeBron probably deserves it even more since he got them an extra win, but hard to imagine them announce LeBron as finals MVP at Oracle.
Of course, losing players have probably deserved the MVP before and not received it, and as you noted West is the only losing player who ever won it and that was way back before Race was old enough to be president. I can't really see it happening, but as you said, it would require a) the Cavs looser in six b) Curry doesn't go off the last two games.
I think there's a good chance both happen. I'd love to see him win it.
This series has always been about GS handling their business than anything else.
Curry was a deserving MVP this year as the best player on the best team and the catalyst for everything that they did. That being said, the brilliance of GS is that they are a team that is built on far more than a single player. Curry is absolutely brilliant as a player and probably the best shooter that I've ever seen (particularly off the dribble). But there's no way that Curry wins a title without having the right pieces and players around him. That's not a knock on him ... that's true for pretty much every single player that has ever played the game.
But that wasn't the same guy as in games 1 through 3.
When my kid who is the biggest LBJ pimp alive starts yelling "Point Shaver!" at the TV, it tells me BronBron was mailing it in.
FMFYFE
Curry was easily the most valuable player on the winning team.
And if you compare Curry's regular season stats to his finals stats, they're down. Iguodala played his best basketball of the year in the finals.
Regular season Curry 23.8 ppg
Finals Curry 26.0 ppg
Regular season Curry 4.3 rpg
Finals Curry 5.2 rpg
And who cares if he played better during the regular season? The Finals MVP goes to the player who was the most valuable in the finals, not the players whose stats increased the most from the regular season in the finals.
Curry was the most valuable player in the series for the Warriors. Take Igoudala off the Warrios and the series is a coinflip. Take Curry off the Warriors and the Cavs win in 5.
Simple fact.
His defense held Lebron to 40 points a game with 2 guys helping him
He was great on wide open shots because Curry took all the defense.