Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Dwayne Washington aka Dwiz Nasty (part 2)

Before the injury: 63 carries 239 yards, (3.8 ypc & 3 TD) with long runs of 12,11,11 and 9.

After the injury: 69 carries 458 yards (6.64 ypc & 6 TD) with long runs of 68, 66, 60 and 18.

The only bad game after the injury was the bowl game which could be an aberration as the whole team sucked donkey dick.

As far as competition, he did nothing against Stanford & Oregon but had an okay game against Cal (12 for 53). The competition at the end of the season was actually more difficult than at the start. Both WSU & OSU according to SRS were less terrible than the 4 non-conference teams which DW didn't do much against. Maybe chalk it up to loss of Johnny Nansen?

Anyway, DW clearly improved after the injury. He had a very nice TD run against UCLA and I recall saying he looked like a real tailback. Then he hit multiple home runs against weak teams & Arizona before not doing much in the bowl game.

A reasonable goal for DW should be to average 100 yards/game against the 7 or 8 worst teams in the schedule. He should definitely surpass 100 against the likes of Sac St, Utah St, WSU, OSU. I don't know who will have mediocre defenses, maybe include Cal, Arizona, USC. Its a conference of weak defenses aside from Stanford.

He had 700 yards last year in 12 games with minimal time against Stanford and Oregon. So 1000 yards is a good expectation. That was only his first full year as a running back. He has two years left and there is no reason he shouldn't be more productive.

The key is for him to really show up in the games that are somewhat winnable or 50-50.....Arizona, Cal and Utah....all at home. Can he run for 100 on those guys? His performance was huge at Arizona last year. Can he do that in multiple games this upcoming season? If he runs for 400 yards against those 3 teams, I don't care if he goes 13 for 25 against Stanford.
«1

Comments

  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,897 Swaye's Wigwam
    I don't think Wash is the problem. I think the play calling is, plain and simple. Sankey or Polk wouldn't even stand a chance with this predictable clusterfuck that spawned the Shaq Thompson fake punt
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,954
    Injuries are a big issue for Washington and as such predicting a 1,000 yard season for him is a little cart before horse to me. No question that he has the potential.

    The Styx man makes a great point though about consistency. Washington is the king of the 1, 2, -1, 3, 50, 2, 6, 4, 0 carry line. The overall average looks great but his average is more tied to outliers than it is normally distributed. Moving his average in non HR type plays more into a consistent 3-5 yards per carry would be huge not only for him, but for this offense as the last thing that we need is 2nd and long situations. Right now, you feel best when you see Washington get the carry on 2nd and 3 instead of 1st and 10.

    There's no question that he's part of the rotation and needs to be a big factor in the offense for the team to be successful. But pinning hopes on him to be THE answer is probably expecting too much.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    Before the injury: 63 carries 239 yards, (3.8 ypc & 3 TD) with long runs of 12,11,11 and 9.

    After the injury: 69 carries 458 yards (6.64 ypc & 6 TD) with long runs of 68, 66, 60 and 18.

    The only bad game after the injury was the bowl game which could be an aberration as the whole team sucked donkey dick.

    As far as competition, he did nothing against Stanford & Oregon but had an okay game against Cal (12 for 53). The competition at the end of the season was actually more difficult than at the start. Both WSU & OSU according to SRS were less terrible than the 4 non-conference teams which DW didn't do much against. Maybe chalk it up to loss of Johnny Nansen?

    Anyway, DW clearly improved after the injury. He had a very nice TD run against UCLA and I recall saying he looked like a real tailback. Then he hit multiple home runs against weak teams & Arizona before not doing much in the bowl game.

    A reasonable goal for DW should be to average 100 yards/game against the 7 or 8 worst teams in the schedule. He should definitely surpass 100 against the likes of Sac St, Utah St, WSU, OSU. I don't know who will have mediocre defenses, maybe include Cal, Arizona, USC. Its a conference of weak defenses aside from Stanford.

    He had 700 yards last year in 12 games with minimal time against Stanford and Oregon. So 1000 yards is a good expectation. That was only his first full year as a running back. He has two years left and there is no reason he shouldn't be more productive.

    The key is for him to really show up in the games that are somewhat winnable or 50-50.....Arizona, Cal and Utah....all at home. Can he run for 100 on those guys? His performance was huge at Arizona last year. Can he do that in multiple games this upcoming season? If he runs for 400 yards against those 3 teams, I don't care if he goes 13 for 25 against Stanford.

    Dude, he wont run for 100 yards in one damn game if Lindy is at QB and again proves he cant hit a 10 yd slant. You'll see 9 in the box if Lindy plays like he did at Hawaii. Insert Penace's brilliant idea of lining up under center out the I. You kinda see how this works in the real world pennis?
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Before the injury: 63 carries 239 yards, (3.8 ypc & 3 TD) with long runs of 12,11,11 and 9.

    After the injury: 69 carries 458 yards (6.64 ypc & 6 TD) with long runs of 68, 66, 60 and 18.

    The only bad game after the injury was the bowl game which could be an aberration as the whole team sucked donkey dick.

    As far as competition, he did nothing against Stanford & Oregon but had an okay game against Cal (12 for 53). The competition at the end of the season was actually more difficult than at the start. Both WSU & OSU according to SRS were less terrible than the 4 non-conference teams which DW didn't do much against. Maybe chalk it up to loss of Johnny Nansen?

    Anyway, DW clearly improved after the injury. He had a very nice TD run against UCLA and I recall saying he looked like a real tailback. Then he hit multiple home runs against weak teams & Arizona before not doing much in the bowl game.

    A reasonable goal for DW should be to average 100 yards/game against the 7 or 8 worst teams in the schedule. He should definitely surpass 100 against the likes of Sac St, Utah St, WSU, OSU. I don't know who will have mediocre defenses, maybe include Cal, Arizona, USC. Its a conference of weak defenses aside from Stanford.

    He had 700 yards last year in 12 games with minimal time against Stanford and Oregon. So 1000 yards is a good expectation. That was only his first full year as a running back. He has two years left and there is no reason he shouldn't be more productive.

    The key is for him to really show up in the games that are somewhat winnable or 50-50.....Arizona, Cal and Utah....all at home. Can he run for 100 on those guys? His performance was huge at Arizona last year. Can he do that in multiple games this upcoming season? If he runs for 400 yards against those 3 teams, I don't care if he goes 13 for 25 against Stanford.

    Dude, he wont run for 100 yards in one damn game if Lindy is at QB and again proves he cant hit a 10 yd slant. You'll see 9 in the box if Lindy plays like he did at Hawaii. Insert Penace's brilliant idea of lining up under center out the I. You kinda see how this works in the real world pennis?
    Does your boy Lindy know you're stabbing him in the back like this?
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Whats your opinion on Lindy, the offense Freeme? I've Never heard anything from you on the football front. Care to join the discussion? Just curious where you stand on the new team after spring? Balls in your court (and no I dont mean in the literal sense you're accustomed to)
  • ThomasFremontThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    Whats your opinion on Lindy, the offense Freeme? I've Never heard anything from you on the football front. Care to join the discussion? Just curious where you stand on the new team after spring? Balls in your court (and no I dont mean in the literal sense you're accustomed to)

    My opinion is it's the offseason, you retard.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    Thomas, the thread is about football. Spring, fall football. How DWashington is going to perform. Has nothing to do with the off season.

    Thomas, ive never seen you post or answer a post regarding husky football during the season either.. I just asked for for your simple opinion on D Wash, the team, Lindy etc..(I mean, thats the thread topic). Look how you respond.
    You just hang on the fringe, lurking around for an opportunity to sneak in and post "free pub" or something else unrelated , unclever and not fun
  • bananasnblondesbananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,427
    This thread is now a shit sundae. Time to start a third one
  • TTJTTJ Member Posts: 4,821
    I don't think DW was ever healthy until about November. He won't be the problem this year. In fact, with any semblance of an OL in front of him, he'd excel.
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,897 Swaye's Wigwam

    This thread is now a shit sundae. Time to start a third one

    Fuck off?
  • TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Awfully cloudy out for September.
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    This thread is now a shit sundae. Time to start a third one

    How bout you start one then...worth reading banana
  • PurpleJPurpleJ Member Posts: 37,537 Founders Club

    I don't think Wash is the problem. I think the play calling is, plain and simple. Sankey or Polk wouldn't even stand a chance with this predictable clusterfuck that spawned the Shaq Thompson fake punt

    Kind of like how Sankey and Polk didn't stand a chance with Sark calling plays?
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,897 Swaye's Wigwam
    PurpleJ said:

    I don't think Wash is the problem. I think the play calling is, plain and simple. Sankey or Polk wouldn't even stand a chance with this predictable clusterfuck that spawned the Shaq Thompson fake punt

    Kind of like how Sankey and Polk didn't stand a chance with Sark calling plays?
    Sark >>>>>> Jonathan Smith
  • PurpleBazePurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,082 Founders Club
    edited May 2015



    Fuck dude gain a little perspective. You just dont seem to get it. Take a few years Pennis, watch a little football, understand the game THEN CHECK FUCKING BACK WITH A CLUE smokewagon.

    I LOL'ed. Does this require taking a walk on the beach?
  • puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    PurpleJ said:

    I don't think Wash is the problem. I think the play calling is, plain and simple. Sankey or Polk wouldn't even stand a chance with this predictable clusterfuck that spawned the Shaq Thompson fake punt

    Kind of like how Sankey and Polk didn't stand a chance with Sark calling plays?
    Sankey and Polk both had a reliable QB and WR's /TE. Kinda see the difference between then and now? And both had blockers who started more than a few games. Oh J, no wonder you just post runing SEC screens. You are more fucking college football stupid than I originally thought. The one time you actually posted a football response you heavily crashed and burned. That explains everything.

Sign In or Register to comment.