Perry, Cruz, Bush, Paul say states rights when they dont want to deal with an issue, the rest want the federal gov in your body. Got it.
The GOP take on Marijuana is FS. Why can't they see that if they moderated their stance, they would win over a decent amount of 18-40 year olds and also get FREE PUB!
I voted for Jefferson because he would legalize it
Perry, Cruz, Bush, Paul say states rights when they dont want to deal with an issue, the rest want the federal gov in your body. Got it. FIFY
The GOP take on Marijuana is FS. Why can't they see that if they moderated their stance, they would win over a decent amount of 18-40 year olds and also get FREE PUB! If you can't see that they don't care about winning over voters OR free pub and they're part of a government that gets kick-backs, extorts cartels and makes more money off its illegality, then I can't help you.
Perry, Cruz, Bush, Paul say states rights when they dont want to deal with an issue, the rest want the federal gov in your body. Got it. FIFY didn't you really mean to say FTUFY?IF I wanted to make a stupid cheesy partisan post to divert from the topic, I would have.
So if the government was truly getting massive kickbacks, extorting pot cartels, and making more money of its illegality, then why wouldn't the Dems be against it? They love taking money from people and giving it to others more than anyone else around. In reality, the most sensible explanation is that the Republicans are too beholden to their Christian Conservative voters who cry foul at any "drug". What they need is a true leader who says their approach is FS, that legalization will create business opportunities for entrepreneurs around the country, and tax revenues could be used at the Federal level to balance the budget. The GOP take on Marijuana is FS. Why can't they see that if they moderated their stance, they would win over a decent amount of 18-40 year olds and also get FREE PUB! If you can't see that they don't care about winning over voters OR free pub and they're part of a government that gets kick-backs, extorts cartels and makes more money off its illegality, then I can't help you.
So if the government was truly getting massive kickbacks, extorting pot cartels, and making more money of its illegality, then why wouldn't the Dems be against it? They love taking money from people and giving it to others more than anyone else around. In reality, the most sensible explanation is that the Republicans are too beholden to their Christian Conservative voters who cry foul at any "drug". What they need is a true leader who says their approach is FS, that legalization will create business opportunities for entrepreneurs around the country, and tax revenues could be used at the Federal level to balance the budget. The GOP take on Marijuana is FS. Why can't they see that if they moderated their stance, they would win over a decent amount of 18-40 year olds and also get FREE PUB! If you can't see that they don't care about winning over voters OR free pub and they're part of a government that gets kick-backs, extorts cartels and makes more money off its illegality, then I can't help you. Religion strikes again.
So if the government was truly getting massive kickbacks, extorting pot cartels, and making more money of its illegality, then why wouldn't the Dems be against it? They love taking money from people and giving it to others more than anyone else around. In reality, the most sensible explanation is that the Republicans are too beholden to their Christian Conservative voters who cry foul at any "drug". What they need is a true leader who says their approach is FS, that legalization will create business opportunities for entrepreneurs around the country, and tax revenues could be used at the Federal level to balance the budget. The GOP take on Marijuana is FS. Why can't they see that if they moderated their stance, they would win over a decent amount of 18-40 year olds and also get FREE PUB! If you can't see that they don't care about winning over voters OR free pub and they're part of a government that gets kick-backs, extorts cartels and makes more money off its illegality, then I can't help you. Religion strikes again. You mean like the Rastafarian State game?
That's the Devil's weed!PS, saying it's a "state issue" is the biggest fucking cop out answer these days.
That's the Devil's weed!PS, saying it's a "state issue" is the biggest fucking cop out answer these days. Disagree.Need more states rights kinds of things. You don't want to smoke dope legally, move to a state where it's possible. You want to have an abortion, trek over to a state where that's allowed. Want to shoot assault rifles and pack heat, pack your bags for Texas or Wyoming or someplace where that's part of their culture/laws. Same concept as a business makes on whether to put a factory in this state or that. Weight the pros and cons. If you don't like it, don't go there or, if you do, LEAVE!
That's the Devil's weed!PS, saying it's a "state issue" is the biggest fucking cop out answer these days. Disagree.Need more states rights kinds of things. You don't want to smoke dope legally, move to a state where it's possible. You want to have an abortion, trek over to a state where that's allowed. Want to shoot assault rifles and pack heat, pack your bags for Texas or Wyoming or someplace where that's part of their culture/laws. Same concept as a business makes on whether to put a factory in this state or that. Weight the pros and cons. If you don't like it, don't go there or, if you do, LEAVE! No. That's fucking retarded.
I await the day when we can have this discussion about cocaine.
I grow it in my greenhouse and give zero shits about what the GOP thinks
I don't like it, but I voted for it because I don't give a fuck what other people do. I voted for gay marriage because I don't give a fuck what other people do. I just wish people would shut the fuck up about both subjects. Why do you give a fuck what other people do in other states?
That's the Devil's weed!PS, saying it's a "state issue" is the biggest fucking cop out answer these days. Disagree.Need more states rights kinds of things. You don't want to smoke dope legally, move to a state where it's possible. You want to have an abortion, trek over to a state where that's allowed. Want to shoot assault rifles and pack heat, pack your bags for Texas or Wyoming or someplace where that's part of their culture/laws. Same concept as a business makes on whether to put a factory in this state or that. Weight the pros and cons. If you don't like it, don't go there or, if you do, LEAVE! Thanks for that hot take, Mitt. And why doesn't everyone just borrow $10,000 from their parents and start business?Despite the fact that you've never actually been poor there are still poor people. People that live pay check to pay check. People that can't afford to just pick up their whole life and leave. And their rights aren't worth less than yours. If this is the logic behind more states rights then it's pretty clearly class warfare. Rich people have the right to live however they want and poor people are fucked. But how do you worship money?
ksat.com/content/pns/ksat/news/2015/05/06/texas-house-committee-approves-bill-to-make-marijuana-legal-for-.html"Republican state Rep. David Simpson of Longview argues marijuana comes from God and therefore shouldn't be banned by government.The tea party stalwart has repeatedly championed what he calls the "Christian case" for legalization."
