Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
For you Peter beaters...
puppylove_sugarsteel
Member Posts: 9,133
He had 3 1st rd picks and went 8-6. Well Utah had 3 2nd rd picks and they stank too.
Also purplej, pac 12 had most drafteez through first 3 rounds. SEC 2nd. And this jsnt the 1st time. So much for that myth. Set em up, puppy will knock-em down you little squeak.
Also purplej, pac 12 had most drafteez through first 3 rounds. SEC 2nd. And this jsnt the 1st time. So much for that myth. Set em up, puppy will knock-em down you little squeak.
Comments
-
Meh, you can do better than that.
-
nybe
-
If your point is we suck and have for 15 years then take it to the AD's office because we simply expect Pete to be a better option than Sark and Ty and Gilby. We have zero input in this program.
-
Better than what? Just throwing out facts. Everyone on kim's big board blames Peter for wasting essentially 4 1st round draft picks. Utah did the same thing. Both had little to work with at QB. The difference? Pete was left with the junk at QB, Wittingham recruited junk at qb and deserves criticism.
-
Defense wins championships...in the NFL. In college not so much
-
Flagged for reading Doogman.cumpuppylove_sugarsteel said:Better than what? Just throwing out facts. Everyone on kim's big board blames Peter for wasting essentially 4 1st round draft picks. Utah did the same thing. Both had little to work with at QB. The difference? Pete was left with the junk at QB, Wittingham recruited junk at qb and deserves criticism.
-
Flagged for being PLSSFS
-
do more drugs
-
Good advice for all of usPostGameOrangeSlices said:do more drugs
-
I would trade Shaq and Peters for one Decent QB wh could throw more than 20 yards
