Full disclosure. Hillary defends Foundation's good works
Source: Foundation tax returns
Comments
-
That's a well (LOL)...sorry a well run (LMAO) foundation. Which Clinton do I have to fuck to get a job there? I'm guessing the answer is all of them.
-
My personal favorite is the amount spent on office supplies vs. IT
-
As Michael Scott would say, "Paper is the future"
But in all seriousness, organizations do have management and overhead expenses, but 90% is pretty absurd. 40%-50% overhead is generally the norm. what cracks me up the 10% travel expense. How the hell do you use up a 10% travel budget? -
If you knew how to read, you'd know that more than 10% goes to charity.greenblood said:As Michael Scott would say, "Paper is the future"
But in all seriousness, organizations do have management and overhead expenses, but 90% is pretty absurd. 40%-50% overhead is generally the norm. what cracks me up the 10% travel expense. How the hell do you use up a 10% travel budget?
Clearly the purpose of the foundation is to siphon money to the Clinton's. But for fucks sakes, get your criticism right. -
so... "Charitable Grants" is code for 'tip money' for when the Clinton's travel?
-
really, no one questions 34% as other? I think that's hilarious.
-
So either unbudgeted money went to charities, or they classify charities as "other expenses". In either case you're reaching. And the last time I checked 34+33+2+6+5+10+10 = 100. But maybe you could teach me "liberal math".2001400ex said:
If you knew how to read, you'd know that more than 10% goes to charity.greenblood said:As Michael Scott would say, "Paper is the future"
But in all seriousness, organizations do have management and overhead expenses, but 90% is pretty absurd. 40%-50% overhead is generally the norm. what cracks me up the 10% travel expense. How the hell do you use up a 10% travel budget?
Clearly the purpose of the foundation is to siphon money to the Clinton's. But for fucks sakes, get your criticism right. -
Do you think any salaries went for charitable causes? Or do you think charity is only giving grants to people?greenblood said:
So either unbudgeted money went to charities, or they classify charities as "other expenses". In either case you're reaching. And the last time I checked 34+33+2+6+5+10+10 = 100. But maybe you could teach me "liberal math".2001400ex said:
If you knew how to read, you'd know that more than 10% goes to charity.greenblood said:As Michael Scott would say, "Paper is the future"
But in all seriousness, organizations do have management and overhead expenses, but 90% is pretty absurd. 40%-50% overhead is generally the norm. what cracks me up the 10% travel expense. How the hell do you use up a 10% travel budget?
Clearly the purpose of the foundation is to siphon money to the Clinton's. But for fucks sakes, get your criticism right.
Like I said, learn to read. -
No, by definition, they went to run the foundation, which based on activity and tax reports, is to raise money for travel and 'other activities'.
Try serving on a foundation, then pop off. -
Then show the 990 where you are listed as serving on a foundation. Then pop off.sarktastic said:No, by definition, they went to run the foundation, which based on activity and tax reports, is to raise money for travel and 'other activities'.
Try serving on a foundation, then pop off. -
So they provide jobs for charity? Paying people that administer the program isn't charity, hth.2001400ex said:
Do you think any salaries went for charitable causes? Or do you think charity is only giving grants to people?greenblood said:
So either unbudgeted money went to charities, or they classify charities as "other expenses". In either case you're reaching. And the last time I checked 34+33+2+6+5+10+10 = 100. But maybe you could teach me "liberal math".2001400ex said:
If you knew how to read, you'd know that more than 10% goes to charity.greenblood said:As Michael Scott would say, "Paper is the future"
But in all seriousness, organizations do have management and overhead expenses, but 90% is pretty absurd. 40%-50% overhead is generally the norm. what cracks me up the 10% travel expense. How the hell do you use up a 10% travel budget?
Clearly the purpose of the foundation is to siphon money to the Clinton's. But for fucks sakes, get your criticism right.
Like I said, learn to read. -
Fuck you are a gullible moron...2001400ex said:
Do you think any salaries went for charitable causes? Or do you think charity is only giving grants to people?greenblood said:
So either unbudgeted money went to charities, or they classify charities as "other expenses". In either case you're reaching. And the last time I checked 34+33+2+6+5+10+10 = 100. But maybe you could teach me "liberal math".2001400ex said:
If you knew how to read, you'd know that more than 10% goes to charity.greenblood said:As Michael Scott would say, "Paper is the future"
But in all seriousness, organizations do have management and overhead expenses, but 90% is pretty absurd. 40%-50% overhead is generally the norm. what cracks me up the 10% travel expense. How the hell do you use up a 10% travel budget?
Clearly the purpose of the foundation is to siphon money to the Clinton's. But for fucks sakes, get your criticism right.
Like I said, learn to read. -
Simple accounting. One email server costs less than postage for laundering.sarktastic said:My personal favorite is the amount spent on office supplies vs. IT
