Full disclosure. Hillary defends Foundation's good works

sarktastic

Source: Foundation tax returns

DeepSeaZ

That's a well (LOL)...sorry a well run (LMAO) foundation. Which Clinton do I have to fuck to get a job there? I'm guessing the answer is all of them.

sarktastic

My personal favorite is the amount spent on office supplies vs. IT

greenblood

As Michael Scott would say, "Paper is the future"

But in all seriousness, organizations do have management and overhead expenses, but 90% is pretty absurd. 40%-50% overhead is generally the norm. what cracks me up the 10% travel expense. How the hell do you use up a 10% travel budget?

2001400ex

greenblood said:

As Michael Scott would say, "Paper is the future"

But in all seriousness, organizations do have management and overhead expenses, but 90% is pretty absurd. 40%-50% overhead is generally the norm. what cracks me up the 10% travel expense. How the hell do you use up a 10% travel budget?

If you knew how to read, you'd know that more than 10% goes to charity.

Clearly the purpose of the foundation is to siphon money to the Clinton's. But for fucks sakes, get your criticism right.

sarktastic

so... "Charitable Grants" is code for 'tip money' for when the Clinton's travel?

DeepSeaZ

really, no one questions 34% as other? I think that's hilarious.

greenblood

2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

As Michael Scott would say, "Paper is the future"

But in all seriousness, organizations do have management and overhead expenses, but 90% is pretty absurd. 40%-50% overhead is generally the norm. what cracks me up the 10% travel expense. How the hell do you use up a 10% travel budget?

If you knew how to read, you'd know that more than 10% goes to charity.

Clearly the purpose of the foundation is to siphon money to the Clinton's. But for fucks sakes, get your criticism right.

So either unbudgeted money went to charities, or they classify charities as "other expenses". In either case you're reaching. And the last time I checked 34+33+2+6+5+10+10 = 100. But maybe you could teach me "liberal math".

2001400ex

greenblood said:

2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

As Michael Scott would say, "Paper is the future"

But in all seriousness, organizations do have management and overhead expenses, but 90% is pretty absurd. 40%-50% overhead is generally the norm. what cracks me up the 10% travel expense. How the hell do you use up a 10% travel budget?

If you knew how to read, you'd know that more than 10% goes to charity.

Clearly the purpose of the foundation is to siphon money to the Clinton's. But for fucks sakes, get your criticism right.

So either unbudgeted money went to charities, or they classify charities as "other expenses". In either case you're reaching. And the last time I checked 34+33+2+6+5+10+10 = 100. But maybe you could teach me "liberal math".

Do you think any salaries went for charitable causes? Or do you think charity is only giving grants to people?

Like I said, learn to read.

sarktastic

No, by definition, they went to run the foundation, which based on activity and tax reports, is to raise money for travel and 'other activities'.

Try serving on a foundation, then pop off.

2001400ex

sarktastic said:

No, by definition, they went to run the foundation, which based on activity and tax reports, is to raise money for travel and 'other activities'.

Try serving on a foundation, then pop off.

Then show the 990 where you are listed as serving on a foundation. Then pop off.

greenblood

2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

As Michael Scott would say, "Paper is the future"

But in all seriousness, organizations do have management and overhead expenses, but 90% is pretty absurd. 40%-50% overhead is generally the norm. what cracks me up the 10% travel expense. How the hell do you use up a 10% travel budget?

If you knew how to read, you'd know that more than 10% goes to charity.

Clearly the purpose of the foundation is to siphon money to the Clinton's. But for fucks sakes, get your criticism right.

So either unbudgeted money went to charities, or they classify charities as "other expenses". In either case you're reaching. And the last time I checked 34+33+2+6+5+10+10 = 100. But maybe you could teach me "liberal math".

Do you think any salaries went for charitable causes? Or do you think charity is only giving grants to people?

Like I said, learn to read.

So they provide jobs for charity? Paying people that administer the program isn't charity, hth.

HoustonHusky

2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

2001400ex said:

greenblood said:

As Michael Scott would say, "Paper is the future"

But in all seriousness, organizations do have management and overhead expenses, but 90% is pretty absurd. 40%-50% overhead is generally the norm. what cracks me up the 10% travel expense. How the hell do you use up a 10% travel budget?

If you knew how to read, you'd know that more than 10% goes to charity.

Clearly the purpose of the foundation is to siphon money to the Clinton's. But for fucks sakes, get your criticism right.

So either unbudgeted money went to charities, or they classify charities as "other expenses". In either case you're reaching. And the last time I checked 34+33+2+6+5+10+10 = 100. But maybe you could teach me "liberal math".

Do you think any salaries went for charitable causes? Or do you think charity is only giving grants to people?

Like I said, learn to read.

Fuck you are a gullible moron...

Southerndawg

sarktastic said:

My personal favorite is the amount spent on office supplies vs. IT

Simple accounting. One email server costs less than postage for laundering.