Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Mad Swede

DoogieMcDoogersonDoogieMcDoogerson Member Posts: 2,495
in Hardcore Husky Board
Watched the replay on my dvr. It was in HD. Fast forwarded through all the bullshit to the 2 minute drill and the scrimmage. Lindy looks the best right now. I think he's our guy for the year. Magna Carta doesn't stand out and Browning looks like he's in 10th grade.

COACHES -- Build an offense around Lindy's strengths and we'll be ok. Development of a QB and an identity for the offense are your top priorities.

Other observations:

D-Line looks like it will be a strength. Secondary will be a strength. Linebackers will be OK and a good D-line will make them look better than they are. Offensively, I think it will be Dwayne Washington carrying the rock and our receivers/TE look slightly above average for a pac-12 squad. The catch that Emoji made was pretty awesome and he looks like the big body TE for our offense.

I think we'll be OK -- similar to last season -- which is not ok. Not enough to be the ducks or ucla. Everyone else will be a game. Probably will lose game 1 at Boise.

Freshman Wildcards
Myles Gaskin
Chico




· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1

Comments

  • whatshouldicareaboutwhatshouldicareabout Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,947 Swaye's Wigwam
    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    Watched the replay on my dvr. It was in HD. Fast forwarded through all the bullshit to the 2 minute drill and the scrimmage. Lindy looks the best right now. I think he's our guy for the year. Magna Carta doesn't stand out and Browning looks like he's in 10th grade.

    COACHES -- Build an offense around Lindy's strengths and we'll be ok. Development of a QB and an identity for the offense are your top priorities.

    Other observations:

    D-Line looks like it will be a strength. Secondary will be a strength. Linebackers will be OK and a good D-line will make them look better than they are. Offensively, I think it will be Dwayne Washington carrying the rock and our receivers/TE look slightly above average for a pac-12 squad. The catch that Emoji made was pretty awesome and he looks like the big body TE for our offense.

    I think we'll be OK -- similar to last season -- which is not ok. Not enough to be the ducks or ucla. Everyone else will be a game. Probably will lose game 1 at Boise.

    Freshman Wildcards
    Myles Gaskin
    Chico

    Keep in mind Feeney and Bierria were out this spring and will be starters at both OLB spots this fall. Victor should be MLB, and Littleton and Lawyer will be back-ups.

    Also, we don't play UCLA this year, so that's not a concern.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DoogieMcDoogersonDoogieMcDoogerson Member Posts: 2,495
    L Boise
    W Sac State
    W Utah State
    W Cal
    L USC
    L DUCKS
    L Turds
    W Arizona
    W Utah
    L ASU
    W Beavers
    W Cougars

    7-5 and a bowel

    Toss ups Boise, Turds, Utah, Arizona

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DoogieMcDoogersonDoogieMcDoogerson Member Posts: 2,495
    Unfortunately, and none of us want to admit this, Sark can't fuck that game up. The talent gap is too large and it is @ usc. Cook it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SpoonieLuvSpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,459
    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    Unfortunately, and none of us want to admit this, Sark can't fuck that game up. The talent gap is too large and it is @ usc. Cook it.

    A three game losing streak with one of the games being to a sark coached team would be total Sarkception.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    Unfortunately, and none of us want to admit this, Sark can't fuck that game up. The talent gap is too large and it is @ usc. Cook it.

    What does this mean? What precedent is there that Sark doesn't fuck up games he desperately wants to win? I'd say we've seen the opposite.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • SpoonieLuvSpoonieLuv Member Posts: 5,459
    DerekJohnson said:

    Sark will bring a caged malamute to practice that week.

    Peterman should bring a plunger in a pet carrier.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,897 Swaye's Wigwam
    topdawgnc said:

    Gladstone said:

    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    Unfortunately, and none of us want to admit this, Sark can't fuck that game up. The talent gap is too large and it is @ usc. Cook it.

    What does this mean? What precedent is there that Sark doesn't fuck up games he desperately wants to win? I'd say we've seen the opposite.
    I think Sark wins this one, at the expense of other winnable games.

    He will prepare for it like he did SC his first two years at UW.

    the OS and WSU games prove when Sark puts his full force into something he can win.

    He's not a "bad" coach ... he's lazy.
    ...


    all that proves is OSU and WSU suck
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GladstoneGladstone Member Posts: 16,419
    topdawgnc said:

    Gladstone said:

    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    Unfortunately, and none of us want to admit this, Sark can't fuck that game up. The talent gap is too large and it is @ usc. Cook it.

    What does this mean? What precedent is there that Sark doesn't fuck up games he desperately wants to win? I'd say we've seen the opposite.
    I think Sark wins this one, at the expense of other winnable games.

    He will prepare for it like he did SC his first two years at UW.

    the OS and WSU games prove when Sark puts his full force into something he can win.

    He's not a "bad" coach ... he's lazy.
    disagree
























    (seriously lol)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HeretoBeatmyChestHeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Abundance...he's bad and lazy.

    I'd love for BallSack to be right that our DL could overpower their OL and control the game.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • unfrozencavemanunfrozencaveman Member Posts: 2,303
    We do not loose at Boise State. One simply does not do that

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    DoogieMcDoogerson said:

    Unfortunately, and none of us want to admit this, Sark can't fuck that game up. The talent gap is too large and it is @ usc. Cook it.


    you might be underestimating Sark's talents.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    What am I missing that y'all are seeing with Lindy as a runner? I saw a big, strong athletic QB that was a tentative and slow runner last year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJWHuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,041 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited April 2015
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    What am I missing that y'all are seeing with Lindy as a runner? I saw a big, strong athletic QB that was a tentative and slow runner last year.

    You mean like the Georgia State game? ;)

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaaeOtZJWoo

    1:45 mark....How dare you make fun of the Vanilla Hammer.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    I'd like to see some hard hitting dog man anal sis on who will (or should) be the starter day 1.

    Do you hear me, Kim?... Fetters?... Fleenor? ESPN, SB Nation, CBS sports, hell, even message bored posters are all willing to lay down controversial predictions all the time... and fuck your 'sources' or what you're 'hearing'. Tell the world what YOU think and why.

    Boys, you have only ONE job... risk your opinions. It's WHY you get paid.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.