Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What's your bold prediction for Husky Football in 2015?

12357

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,226
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    1-2 non-conference
    6-3 conference
    close bowl loss

    7-6 overall

    So you're saying Peterman is the wrong guy?
    I'd say 4-5 --> 6-3 would be a good sign that we very well may have the right guy.

    Winning 6 games in conference with the amount of turnover on the roster (no QB with game experience, replacement of essentially both OL/DL, turnover of 2/3 of the LB corps) plus what would appear to be a limited number of difference makers at the junior/senior levels of the roster would be an OUTSTANDING year be Petersen.

    If I would have said the following, would your comment regarding Petersen being the wrong guy still hold:

    3-0 non-conference
    5-4 conference
    1-0 win shitty bowl game
    9-4 overall

    And, let's be honest here for a second, before Don James was Don James, many people were willing to send him door.ass.out after starting 1977 at 1-3.

    I don't expect a conference champion this year. Unrealistic. I expect a complete turnover in the culture evident by year end (i.e. stench of Seven completely gone). I expect to have relative clarity regarding the QB position going forward by the end of the year. I expect that the team will improve throughout the year and play its best football in November. I would love to see this team get to 6 conference wins but think that 5 is the number we'll ultimately get to.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Dardanus
    Dardanus Member Posts: 2,623
    Tequilla said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    1-2 non-conference
    6-3 conference
    close bowl loss

    7-6 overall

    So you're saying Peterman is the wrong guy?
    I'd say 4-5 --> 6-3 would be a good sign that we very well may have the right guy.

    Winning 6 games in conference with the amount of turnover on the roster (no QB with game experience, replacement of essentially both OL/DL, turnover of 2/3 of the LB corps) plus what would appear to be a limited number of difference makers at the junior/senior levels of the roster would be an OUTSTANDING year be Petersen.

    If I would have said the following, would your comment regarding Petersen being the wrong guy still hold:

    3-0 non-conference
    5-4 conference
    1-0 win shitty bowl game
    9-4 overall

    And, let's be honest here for a second, before Don James was Don James, many people were willing to send him door.ass.out after starting 1977 at 1-3.

    I don't expect a conference champion this year. Unrealistic. I expect a complete turnover in the culture evident by year end (i.e. stench of Seven completely gone). I expect to have relative clarity regarding the QB position going forward by the end of the year. I expect that the team will improve throughout the year and play its best football in November. I would love to see this team get to 6 conference wins but think that 5 is the number we'll ultimately get to.
    So if they improve throughout the year, have culture turnover, and are playing best in November, why the close bowl loss?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,226
    Dardanus said:

    Tequilla said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    1-2 non-conference
    6-3 conference
    close bowl loss

    7-6 overall

    So you're saying Peterman is the wrong guy?
    I'd say 4-5 --> 6-3 would be a good sign that we very well may have the right guy.

    Winning 6 games in conference with the amount of turnover on the roster (no QB with game experience, replacement of essentially both OL/DL, turnover of 2/3 of the LB corps) plus what would appear to be a limited number of difference makers at the junior/senior levels of the roster would be an OUTSTANDING year be Petersen.

    If I would have said the following, would your comment regarding Petersen being the wrong guy still hold:

    3-0 non-conference
    5-4 conference
    1-0 win shitty bowl game
    9-4 overall

    And, let's be honest here for a second, before Don James was Don James, many people were willing to send him door.ass.out after starting 1977 at 1-3.

    I don't expect a conference champion this year. Unrealistic. I expect a complete turnover in the culture evident by year end (i.e. stench of Seven completely gone). I expect to have relative clarity regarding the QB position going forward by the end of the year. I expect that the team will improve throughout the year and play its best football in November. I would love to see this team get to 6 conference wins but think that 5 is the number we'll ultimately get to.
    So if they improve throughout the year, have culture turnover, and are playing best in November, why the close bowl loss?
    I expect that they will play a team that is a little better than them if they 6-3 in conference - similar to how we played KState in the Holiday Bowl in 1999.

    I see at least 2, if not 3, BCS caliber teams in the PAC next year. If that's the case, everybody gets bumped up a bit in the bowl pecking order.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    Tequilla said:

    Dardanus said:

    Tequilla said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    1-2 non-conference
    6-3 conference
    close bowl loss

    7-6 overall

    So you're saying Peterman is the wrong guy?
    I'd say 4-5 --> 6-3 would be a good sign that we very well may have the right guy.

    Winning 6 games in conference with the amount of turnover on the roster (no QB with game experience, replacement of essentially both OL/DL, turnover of 2/3 of the LB corps) plus what would appear to be a limited number of difference makers at the junior/senior levels of the roster would be an OUTSTANDING year be Petersen.

    If I would have said the following, would your comment regarding Petersen being the wrong guy still hold:

    3-0 non-conference
    5-4 conference
    1-0 win shitty bowl game
    9-4 overall

    And, let's be honest here for a second, before Don James was Don James, many people were willing to send him door.ass.out after starting 1977 at 1-3.

    I don't expect a conference champion this year. Unrealistic. I expect a complete turnover in the culture evident by year end (i.e. stench of Seven completely gone). I expect to have relative clarity regarding the QB position going forward by the end of the year. I expect that the team will improve throughout the year and play its best football in November. I would love to see this team get to 6 conference wins but think that 5 is the number we'll ultimately get to.
    So if they improve throughout the year, have culture turnover, and are playing best in November, why the close bowl loss?
    I expect that they will play a team that is a little better than them if they 6-3 in conference - similar to how we played KState in the Holiday Bowl in 1999.

    I see at least 2, if not 3, BCS caliber teams in the PAC next year. If that's the case, everybody gets bumped up a bit in the bowl pecking order.
    Pac12 bowls are shit. If you go 7-5 you'll be playing a shit team. Like Okie st, Maryland or Colorado State (UWs, Stanford's and Utahs opponent).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,226
    BallSacked said:

    Tequilla said:

    Dardanus said:

    Tequilla said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    1-2 non-conference
    6-3 conference
    close bowl loss

    7-6 overall

    So you're saying Peterman is the wrong guy?
    I'd say 4-5 --> 6-3 would be a good sign that we very well may have the right guy.

    Winning 6 games in conference with the amount of turnover on the roster (no QB with game experience, replacement of essentially both OL/DL, turnover of 2/3 of the LB corps) plus what would appear to be a limited number of difference makers at the junior/senior levels of the roster would be an OUTSTANDING year be Petersen.

    If I would have said the following, would your comment regarding Petersen being the wrong guy still hold:

    3-0 non-conference
    5-4 conference
    1-0 win shitty bowl game
    9-4 overall

    And, let's be honest here for a second, before Don James was Don James, many people were willing to send him door.ass.out after starting 1977 at 1-3.

    I don't expect a conference champion this year. Unrealistic. I expect a complete turnover in the culture evident by year end (i.e. stench of Seven completely gone). I expect to have relative clarity regarding the QB position going forward by the end of the year. I expect that the team will improve throughout the year and play its best football in November. I would love to see this team get to 6 conference wins but think that 5 is the number we'll ultimately get to.
    So if they improve throughout the year, have culture turnover, and are playing best in November, why the close bowl loss?
    I expect that they will play a team that is a little better than them if they 6-3 in conference - similar to how we played KState in the Holiday Bowl in 1999.

    I see at least 2, if not 3, BCS caliber teams in the PAC next year. If that's the case, everybody gets bumped up a bit in the bowl pecking order.
    Pac12 bowls are shit. If you go 7-5 you'll be playing a shit team. Like Okie st, Maryland or Colorado State (UWs, Stanford's and Utahs opponent).
    I believe the selection goes off conference record unless I'm completely mistaken
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ApostleofGrief
    ApostleofGrief Member Posts: 3,904
    I think this season will be the first of the last two years of Peterman
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    ApostleofGrief said:

    I think this season will be the first of the last two years of Peterman

    #Gutsy
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CaptainPJ
    CaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986
    Tequilla said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Tequilla said:

    1-2 non-conference
    6-3 conference
    close bowl loss

    7-6 overall

    So you're saying Peterman is the wrong guy?
    I'd say 4-5 --> 6-3 would be a good sign that we very well may have the right guy.

    Winning 6 games in conference with the amount of turnover on the roster (no QB with game experience, replacement of essentially both OL/DL, turnover of 2/3 of the LB corps) plus what would appear to be a limited number of difference makers at the junior/senior levels of the roster would be an OUTSTANDING year be Petersen.

    If I would have said the following, would your comment regarding Petersen being the wrong guy still hold:

    3-0 non-conference
    5-4 conference
    1-0 win shitty bowl game
    9-4 overall

    And, let's be honest here for a second, before Don James was Don James, many people were willing to send him door.ass.out after starting 1977 at 1-3.

    I don't expect a conference champion this year. Unrealistic. I expect a complete turnover in the culture evident by year end (i.e. stench of Seven completely gone). I expect to have relative clarity regarding the QB position going forward by the end of the year. I expect that the team will improve throughout the year and play its best football in November. I would love to see this team get to 6 conference wins but think that 5 is the number we'll ultimately get to.

    I like to pretend the Dawgs are in the NFC West, that's WILTD.

    They are playing college kids.

    Coach them the fuck up and go punch someone in the fucking mouth
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CaptainPJ
    CaptainPJ Member Posts: 2,986
    Tequilla said:

    BallSacked said:

    Tequilla said:

    1-2 non-conference
    6-3 conference
    close bowl loss

    7-6 overall

    Normally I wouldn't encourage a boobs talking point, but if Peterson or any P12 coach loses to Utah State or Sac State they should be fired and lit ablaze at the 50 yard line.
    Anybody that knows me well knows that I am a TLDR fuckstick that likes to throw down at the Aurora 7-11, on the Ave in the U-District, on Montlake
    Come on now!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter