Rant Sports: Chris Petersen Must Produce Results in Year Two at Washington

topdawgnc

RaceBannon said:

He must but it's interesting that he's the first coach at UW since Rick that has had that written about him.

It's hell being white.

doogsinparadise

No warning, just gone?

d2d

RaceBannon said:

He must but it's interesting that he's the first coach at UW since Rick that has had that written about him.

You're a racist.

SpoonieLuv

ApostleofGrief

whatshouldicareabout said:

A sharp plummet is going from 8-5 to 5-7 or worse? As if you're treating 8-5 as something special and that 5-7 is something significantly different?

2015 will be the year of serious problems at QB but not 2014? You mean like Petersen having the QBs he scouted and recruited for his offense versus the QBs Sark scouted and recruited for his offense?

You expect Woodward to have the initiative to fire a coach for having a shitty record at UW? Has that ever happened? Will that ever happen?

I suspect some of you think that because there were problems last year at quarterback, for some reason that makes this year a freebie or whatever in terms of a starting point. Like everybody is going to happily say "Oh, it was this bad last year, not Peterman's fault." "Look on the bright side, it is no worse than last year." "2019 is going to be special."

The fact is that playing high school football in California is one thing, but playing in the PAC-12 is another thing. I don't believe this bullshit that people say "oh, he's such a great prospect, he going to step right in at QB."

Gladstone

SpoonieLuv said: