Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Half of meteorologists don’t believe in man-made global warming. American Meteorological Society
Comments
-
Except I didn't tell anyone how to live. I like your idea, let's just end regulations so corporations can rape and pillage the land. Remember lakes on fire and no drinking water?RaceBannon said:
You're too stupid to post here. I didn't say right or wrong. I said what effect and what is the cost to make a difference.2001400ex said:
Even if the vast majority of everyone who actually studies this for a living is wrong (cause clearly you are smarter than then). The worst case scenario is we have a cleaner environment. I think it's a win win. But you too busy slurping on Republican nut sack.RaceBannon said:We shouldn't listen to anyone until they can tell what man's role is and what if anything would actually make a difference and what it would involve cost wise.
Until then it's all bullshit and no one wants to give any of their shit up.
Fucked up light bulbs aren't the answer
Fuck off
Of course you don't address that. You cant. No one has. The only one parroting a party line is you.
The worst case scenario is a bunch of stupid laws that punish the poor and middle so your rich masters can tell people how to live when they have no intent to practice what they preach.
We have the cleanest environment. And a great way of life. And a bunch of jackasses claiming the sky is falling
Put up or shut up. Specifics.
You won't even give up your ATV but you're happy to tell others how to live
Fuck off
That's funny how you say regulations hurt the poor and middle class, yet it's big business funding conservatives trying to relax the regulations. Why is that?
Use your brain. -
I spent two weeks in India. You can barely see the sun, garbage everywhere and when it gets to much into the street, they just burn it. Not to mention no potable water, I had to get like 5 shots to go there.Doogles said:
Because China gives a fuck what the western world has to say. They are too busy bathing themselves in our debt to give a shit.2001400ex said:
Gas is the most efficient so we shouldn't look for alternatives. Great thinking there genius. What do you think about ethanol, otherwise known as the plan the conservatives pushed when they were in power. That worked out well,, right?HoustonHusky said:
Sounds grand, but FS...although not as FS as your lame 'I Love Lamp' equivalent you ended the Antarctica thread with (or pretty much anything you typed in that thread...)2001400ex said:
Even if the vast majority of everyone who actually studies this for a living is wrong (cause clearly you are smarter than then). The worst case scenario is we have a cleaner environment. I think it's a win win. But you too busy slurping on Republican nut sack.RaceBannon said:We shouldn't listen to anyone until they can tell what man's role is and what if anything would actually make a difference and what it would involve cost wise.
Until then it's all bullshit and no one wants to give any of their shit up.
Fucked up light bulbs aren't the answer
Fuck off
Two of many examples...CO2 capture and batteries. CO2 capture is a technology the govt spends a ton of money on and it trying to push via CO2 credits. Does it make sense to spend more than 1/3 of the power output of an electrical plant to "capture" the CO2 and pump it really far into the ground? That means you burn up 1/3 more hydrocarbons, and have to build 1/3 more power plants. FS. As for batteries, its the new "environmental car", but if you look at the overall energy efficiency vs. gasoline it can't come close to matching it (and doesn't even match the carbon efficiency in most places...), and on top of that you start manufacturing a boatload of batteries that have all sorts of toxic chemicals in them. FS.
Both "solutions" resulting in a "cleaner environment" and both FS...
Now that I'm done giving you shit. The reality is, we (everyone, not just America) need to clean up our act. I wish we'd push China and India to clean their shit because that's where a ton of the emissions originate. Not to mention the other pollution there.
Either way, it's silly to give in to corporate wishes to pollute as much as they want.
Walking through Calcutta is like tiptoeing a dog run that hasn't been poop scooped in 30 years. They don't give a shit either.
It's wonderful life, really. -
WTF? I think my 3 year old has a better grasp on reality than you.2001400ex said:
Gas is the most efficient so we shouldn't look for alternatives. Great thinking there genius. What do you think about ethanol, otherwise known as the plan the conservatives pushed when they were in power. That worked out well,, right?HoustonHusky said:
Sounds grand, but FS...although not as FS as your lame 'I Love Lamp' equivalent you ended the Antarctica thread with (or pretty much anything you typed in that thread...)2001400ex said:
Even if the vast majority of everyone who actually studies this for a living is wrong (cause clearly you are smarter than then). The worst case scenario is we have a cleaner environment. I think it's a win win. But you too busy slurping on Republican nut sack.RaceBannon said:We shouldn't listen to anyone until they can tell what man's role is and what if anything would actually make a difference and what it would involve cost wise.
Until then it's all bullshit and no one wants to give any of their shit up.
Fucked up light bulbs aren't the answer
Fuck off
Two of many examples...CO2 capture and batteries. CO2 capture is a technology the govt spends a ton of money on and it trying to push via CO2 credits. Does it make sense to spend more than 1/3 of the power output of an electrical plant to "capture" the CO2 and pump it really far into the ground? That means you burn up 1/3 more hydrocarbons, and have to build 1/3 more power plants. FS. As for batteries, its the new "environmental car", but if you look at the overall energy efficiency vs. gasoline it can't come close to matching it (and doesn't even match the carbon efficiency in most places...), and on top of that you start manufacturing a boatload of batteries that have all sorts of toxic chemicals in them. FS.
Both "solutions" resulting in a "cleaner environment" and both FS...
Now that I'm done giving you shit. The reality is, we (everyone, not just America) need to clean up our act. I wish we'd push China and India to clean their shit because that's where a ton of the emissions originate. Not to mention the other pollution there.
Either way, it's silly to give in to corporate wishes to pollute as much as they want.
Compared to the electrical grid which is ~33%, and then factor in electric cars that are at their best 50% (yielding a whole ~16.5% efficiency)? All using coal in many parts of the country to generate the electricity? Moron.
And what kind of ethanol...that from sugar cane, or corn, or switchgrass? You don't know and have no clue if it makes a difference because you can't actually think...you just parrot lines from whatever numbnut websites you peruse while pretending to have an IQ above a actual speed limit.
All while *gurgling*. -
I'm not against keeping the earth clean, but how many times is the U.S.A going to hold the flag for all the problems of the world to its own detriment?2001400ex said:
I spent two weeks in India. You can barely see the sun, garbage everywhere and when it gets to much into the street, they just burn it. Not to mention no potable water, I had to get like 5 shots to go there.Doogles said:
Because China gives a fuck what the western world has to say. They are too busy bathing themselves in our debt to give a shit.2001400ex said:
Gas is the most efficient so we shouldn't look for alternatives. Great thinking there genius. What do you think about ethanol, otherwise known as the plan the conservatives pushed when they were in power. That worked out well,, right?HoustonHusky said:
Sounds grand, but FS...although not as FS as your lame 'I Love Lamp' equivalent you ended the Antarctica thread with (or pretty much anything you typed in that thread...)2001400ex said:
Even if the vast majority of everyone who actually studies this for a living is wrong (cause clearly you are smarter than then). The worst case scenario is we have a cleaner environment. I think it's a win win. But you too busy slurping on Republican nut sack.RaceBannon said:We shouldn't listen to anyone until they can tell what man's role is and what if anything would actually make a difference and what it would involve cost wise.
Until then it's all bullshit and no one wants to give any of their shit up.
Fucked up light bulbs aren't the answer
Fuck off
Two of many examples...CO2 capture and batteries. CO2 capture is a technology the govt spends a ton of money on and it trying to push via CO2 credits. Does it make sense to spend more than 1/3 of the power output of an electrical plant to "capture" the CO2 and pump it really far into the ground? That means you burn up 1/3 more hydrocarbons, and have to build 1/3 more power plants. FS. As for batteries, its the new "environmental car", but if you look at the overall energy efficiency vs. gasoline it can't come close to matching it (and doesn't even match the carbon efficiency in most places...), and on top of that you start manufacturing a boatload of batteries that have all sorts of toxic chemicals in them. FS.
Both "solutions" resulting in a "cleaner environment" and both FS...
Now that I'm done giving you shit. The reality is, we (everyone, not just America) need to clean up our act. I wish we'd push China and India to clean their shit because that's where a ton of the emissions originate. Not to mention the other pollution there.
Either way, it's silly to give in to corporate wishes to pollute as much as they want.
Walking through Calcutta is like tiptoeing a dog run that hasn't been poop scooped in 30 years. They don't give a shit either.
It's wonderful life, really.
This country is dying. The debt (and who owns it) is laughable. Technology is increasingly creeping into the archaic hands of enemies seen and unseen who grow more plentiful by the day.
I get why people want to put a smoke screen up to skip in a field of flowers, but serious shit is going down.
The great Al Pacino said it best, "Either we heal as a team, or we will die as individuals".
The conversations need to change, and there just isn't enough data out there to waste resources on a kumbaya fairytale while we gurgle into oblivion. -
RaceBannon said:
You're too stupid to post here. I didn't say right or wrong. I said what effect and what is the cost to make a difference.2001400ex said:
Even if the vast majority of everyone who actually studies this for a living is wrong (cause clearly you are smarter than then). The worst case scenario is we have a cleaner environment. I think it's a win win. But you too busy slurping on Republican nut sack.RaceBannon said:We shouldn't listen to anyone until they can tell what man's role is and what if anything would actually make a difference and what it would involve cost wise.
Until then it's all bullshit and no one wants to give any of their shit up.
Fucked up light bulbs aren't the answer
Fuck off
Of course you don't address that. You cant. No one has. The only one parroting a party line is you.
The worst case scenario is a bunch of stupid laws that punish the poor and middle so your rich masters can tell people how to live when they have no intent to practice what they preach.
We have the cleanest environment. And a great way of life. And a bunch of jackasses claiming the sky is falling
Put up or shut up. Specifics.
You won't even give up your ATV but you're happy to tell others how to live
Fuck off
