Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

September 4, 2010

12467

Comments

  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,223

    If Petersen is as good at developing players as I think he is, we are going to see many pleasant surprises at several positions by mid to late September.

    I'm less worried about the non-QB positions as I am about the QB positions.
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381

    If Petersen is as good at developing players as I think he is, we are going to see many pleasant surprises at several positions by mid to late September.

    If Peterman is so good at developing players, WTF happened to the UW offense last year?
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    If Petersen thinks there is any chance we don't roll over Boise St, he better be sleeping in his office figuring out a way to make it happen.

    Win or GTFO.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,400 Founders Club
    AZDuck said:

    If Petersen is as good at developing players as I think he is, we are going to see many pleasant surprises at several positions by mid to late September.

    If Peterman is so good at developing players, WTF happened to the UW offense last year?
    QPOTD. What the fuck is there to develop with Miles' arm?
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    edited February 2015

    Petersen needs to start proving it by the end of next year. It's not the best analogy but you could see the Seahawks were going to be good in the future at the end of the 2002 and 2011 seasons. That's the vibe that's needed.

    I agree with this
    You could see carrolls first trojan team was going to be good as well. Even though they finished year 1 at 6-6 and then started year 2 0-2 or 1-2 there simply was a feeling they were ready to take off.
  • beelzebub
    beelzebub Member Posts: 361
    Wow Race I am impressed I take back the title of king apologist for Petersen I bestowed on u.
    If he is a good coach he should produce next year.
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839

    Gladstone said:

    Blows my mind that some of the dooglier posters on here are already writing bsu off as a loss. Embarrassing. 2 offseasons with the team by this point. If the game isn't at worst a toss up then Petersen isn't remotely who we thought he was.

    Except we don't have a QB, a new OL that isn't particularly exciting, and the best players on defense are all gone. And the game is on the blue turf where Boise has always been great. Besides all of that, I love our chances.

    But I guess we can doog it up and pretend this will be a good team after another off season natty.
    Bob Stoops won a natty in year two with a roster full of nobodies.

    Good coaches win.

    I still am standing by 3 years, although I expect big mo to be rolling by end of year 2.
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    haie said:

    AZDuck said:

    If Petersen is as good at developing players as I think he is, we are going to see many pleasant surprises at several positions by mid to late September.

    If Peterman is so good at developing players, WTF happened to the UW offense last year?
    QPOTD. What the fuck is there to develop with Miles' arm?
    And the RBs?

    I mean, how bare was the cupboard?