Questions answered: Petersen can recruit

Auburndawg

Coming from the MWC there were legitimate questions about whether or not our recruiting would fall off from what we had seen during the Sark era. Those questions have now been answered.

Eight 4 stars. Ten high level 3 stars. 3.21 star rating. As good or better as any class since Scout started keeping records.

No longer any reason to worry about Petersen being able to recruit.

dnc

Auburndawg said:

Coming from the MWC there were legitimate questions about whether or not our recruiting would fall off from what we had seen during the Sark era. Those questions have now been answered.

Eight 4 stars. Ten high level 3 stars. 3.21 star rating. As good or better as any class since Scout started keeping records.

No longer any reason to worry about Petersen being able to recruit.

DPOTD

RoadDawg55

Aubbie, is Romar still ahead of schedule?

dnc

RoadDawg55 said:

Aubbie, is Romar still ahead of schedule?

The basketball team does not suck!

Vegasdawg

How many here questioned Pete's ability to recruit? I didn't.

MisterEm

Hey Aubie...11-2 this year?

Fire_Marshall_Bill

I haven't checked the TBS sites in at least an hour but one of them had Warshington 29th (yes, more people will officially sign later today). That's not great, though I actually have faith CP will develop these guys.

sarktastic

Auburndawg said:

Coming from the MWC there were legitimate questions about whether or not our recruiting would fall off from what we had seen during the Sark era. Those questions have now been answered.

Eight 4 stars. Ten high level 3 stars. 3.21 star rating. As good or better as any class since Scout started keeping records.

No longer any reason to worry about Petersen being able to recruit.

The problem was never how to sustain Sarks recruiting, the question has always been to what degree will he improve upon it and will it be enough?

RaccoonHarry

dnc said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Aubbie, is Romar still ahead of schedule?

The basketball team does not suck!</</b>blockquote>

In fairness, the team WAS better when a certain 7' drug dealer roamed the paint...

HeretoBeatmyChest

I turned to my wife and said we are so lucky to have AuburnDawg posting here.

jecornel

This year's Super Bowl apparently did not have any 5 star recruits in the game. Russell a three star recruit.

Both rosters had an average star rating of 2.4.

Michael Bennett unrated

ThomasFremont

jecornel said:

This year's Super Bowl apparently did not have any 5 star recruits in the game. Russell a three star recruit.

Both rosters had an average star rating of 2.4.

Michael Bennett unrated

Stan Empterpaenan was a 1/2 star

SpoonieLuv

Auburndawg said:

Coming from the MWC there were legitimate questions about whether or not our recruiting would fall off from what we had seen during the Sark era. Those questions have now been answered.

Eight 4 stars. Ten high level 3 stars. 3.21 star rating. As good or better as any class since Scout started keeping records.

No longer any reason to worry about Petersen being able to recruit.

DerekJohnson

SpoonieLuv said:

Auburndawg said:

Coming from the MWC there were legitimate questions about whether or not our recruiting would fall off from what we had seen during the Sark era. Those questions have now been answered.

Eight 4 stars. Ten high level 3 stars. 3.21 star rating. As good or better as any class since Scout started keeping records.

No longer any reason to worry about Petersen being able to recruit.

SpoonieLuv remains King of the animated gifs.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

Auburndawg said:

Coming from the MWC there were legitimate questions about whether or not our recruiting would fall off from what we had seen during the Sark era. Those questions have now been answered.

Eight 4 stars. Ten high level 3 stars. 3.21 star rating. As good or better as any class since Scout started keeping records.

No longer any reason to worry about Petersen being able to recruit.

Fall off from Sark's recruiting? Unbalanced classes, lots of receivers, swinging for the fences but batting less than .100, getting last minute guys like diamond in the RUFF Taylor Hindu?

I was never worried about a fall off from Patron's recruiting prowess.

SpoonieLuv

DerekJohnson said:

SpoonieLuv said:

Auburndawg said:

Coming from the MWC there were legitimate questions about whether or not our recruiting would fall off from what we had seen during the Sark era. Those questions have now been answered.

Eight 4 stars. Ten high level 3 stars. 3.21 star rating. As good or better as any class since Scout started keeping records.

No longer any reason to worry about Petersen being able to recruit.

SpoonieLuv remains King of the animated gifs.

dnc

CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:

Auburndawg said:

Coming from the MWC there were legitimate questions about whether or not our recruiting would fall off from what we had seen during the Sark era. Those questions have now been answered.

Eight 4 stars. Ten high level 3 stars. 3.21 star rating. As good or better as any class since Scout started keeping records.

No longer any reason to worry about Petersen being able to recruit.

Fall off from Sark's recruiting? Unbalanced classes, lots of receivers, swinging for the fences but batting less than .100, getting last minute guys like diamond in the RUFF Taylor Hindu?

I was never worried about a fall off from Patron's recruiting prowess.

Exactly

Sledog

I never doubted Petermans recruiting, the guy can get it done!

90sHuskyFan

Wow! Aubbie obviously bought into that line of no-brained, Dawgman fed "Petersen hasn't shown he can recruit in the Pac-12" bullshit. I now realize that I gave him waaaaaay too much credit in the past... As in ANY credit at all.