Somebody made Millers Mailbag

BallSacked

LINK

"Mush Huskies from Portland writes: 8-6. A few plays against Stanford and a different "chart" against Arizona, and the Huskies are sitting at 10-4. But that didn't happen, so we're still 8-6. A new coach, lots of transfers, blah blah blah... there's still a lot of supposed talent on this team -- just look at the recruiting classes -- not great, but respectable. But I repeat: 8-6. Can someone please explain how the Huskies have been "rebuilding" since Owen 12 in 2008?

doogsinparadise

Your eyes are as good as mine.

whatshouldicareabout

BallSacked said:

LINK

"Mush Huskies from Portland writes: 8-6. A few plays against Stanford and a different "chart" against Arizona, and the Huskies are sitting at 10-4. But that didn't happen, so we're still 8-6. A new coach, lots of transfers, blah blah blah... there's still a lot of supposed talent on this team -- just look at the recruiting classes -- not great, but respectable. But I repeat: 8-6. Can someone please explain how the Huskies have been "rebuilding" since Owen 12 in 2008?

To answer your question: We had Sark for 5 years.

That should cover all of Sark's 5 years as well as Petersen's first year here.

H_D

Whoever on this board wrote into Ted Miller should:

Tequilla

If you can't see the genius in getting OWEN TWELVE published by ESPN, then I don't know what to tell you