The SEC West is obviously the best division in CFB

If not the SEC West, then who? Certainly not the Pac-12 South or North.

Maybe the XII?
It sure as fuck isn't the group that gave up 9,000,000 points in bowl games collectively.

Then tell me who it is or *gurgle* in the McKenzie.

puppylove_sugarsteel

So they didn't win all those titles?

Titles under the fraudulent bcs. 2 years without an SEC team now Race. Expect more of the same going forward. Before the bcs, titles were spread evenly. No more LSUvs Alabama matchups in the title game. Now b a ck to dfi with ya!

droggins

So they didn't win all those titles?

Stop living in the past.

TierbsHsotBoobs

So they didn't win all those titles?

So they didn't win all those titles?
Titles under the fraudulent bcs. 2 years without an SEC team now Race. Expect more of the same going forward. Before the bcs, titles were spread evenly. No more LSUvs Alabama matchups in the title game. Now b a ck to dfi with ya!

How is a 4 team playoff legitimate but a 2 team playoff is fraudulent?

Go tell TCU that the four best teams were in the playoff this year.

UWerentThereMan

So they didn't win all those titles?

So they didn't win all those titles?
Titles under the fraudulent bcs. 2 years without an SEC team now Race. Expect more of the same going forward. Before the bcs, titles were spread evenly. No more LSUvs Alabama matchups in the title game. Now b a ck to dfi with ya!

puppy's got a poont, under the old system its Bama and FSU in the title game

TierbsHsotBoobs

So they didn't win all those titles?

So they didn't win all those titles?
Titles under the fraudulent bcs. 2 years without an SEC team now Race. Expect more of the same going forward. Before the bcs, titles were spread evenly. No more LSUvs Alabama matchups in the title game. Now b a ck to dfi with ya!
puppy's got a poont, under the old system its Bama and FSU in the title game

The one fair point I'll concede is that the SEC would have fewer national titles with a four team playoff over the last 16 years, just because of the sample size effect.

On the other hand, they were playing by the same rules as everyone else. Fuckers who want to invalidate all those titles are worse than the Oregon bitches who think college football started in 1994.

RoadDawg55

Arkansas could go 8-1 in the Pac 12 South.
Hell, Boise won the Pac-12 South.

All three of your top 4 teams lost. Two got plungered. The 4th SEC team lost to a team coming off a 59-0 loss.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Arkansas could go 8-1 in the Pac 12 South.
Hell, Boise won the Pac-12 South.
All three of your top 4 teams lost. Two got plungered. The 4th SEC team lost to a team coming off a 59-0 loss.

And yet, unless something drastically changes, the SEC West is still the best:
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/2014/conference/

Name someone better or shut the fuck up.

BallSacked

Arkansas could go 8-1 in the Pac 12 South.
Hell, Boise won the Pac-12 South.
All three of your top 4 teams lost. Two got plungered. The 4th SEC team lost to a team coming off a 59-0 loss.
And yet, unless something drastically changes, the SEC West is still the best:
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/2014/conference/

Name someone better or shut the fuck up.

Fuck Sagarin. I'm all for advanced stats, but these SEC teams don't play anyone out of conference, only play 8games in conference, and then get plungered in bowl season. The model is flawed, and, as always, stats are for losers.

RoadDawg55

Arkansas could go 8-1 in the Pac 12 South.
Hell, Boise won the Pac-12 South.
All three of your top 4 teams lost. Two got plungered. The 4th SEC team lost to a team coming off a 59-0 loss.
And yet, unless something drastically changes, the SEC West is still the best:
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/2014/conference/

Name someone better or shut the fuck up.

Anusulcer.gif. The top 5 SEC West teams lost. But how was the SEC West overrated?

TierbsHsotBoobs

Arkansas could go 8-1 in the Pac 12 South.
Hell, Boise won the Pac-12 South.
All three of your top 4 teams lost. Two got plungered. The 4th SEC team lost to a team coming off a 59-0 loss.
And yet, unless something drastically changes, the SEC West is still the best:
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/2014/conference/

Name someone better or shut the fuck up.
Fuck Sagarin. I'm all for advanced stats, but these SEC teams don't play anyone out of conference, only play 8games in conference, and then get plungered in bowl season. The model is flawed, and, as always, stats are for losers.

Fine. Find an answer that says someone else is better.

droggins

Arkansas could go 8-1 in the Pac 12 South.
Hell, Boise won the Pac-12 South.
All three of your top 4 teams lost. Two got plungered. The 4th SEC team lost to a team coming off a 59-0 loss.
And yet, unless something drastically changes, the SEC West is still the best:
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/2014/conference/

Name someone better or shut the fuck up.

Using a rating system that includes "scrimmages" is not a credible source.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Arkansas could go 8-1 in the Pac 12 South.
Hell, Boise won the Pac-12 South.
All three of your top 4 teams lost. Two got plungered. The 4th SEC team lost to a team coming off a 59-0 loss.
And yet, unless something drastically changes, the SEC West is still the best:
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/ncaaf/sagarin/2014/conference/

Name someone better or shut the fuck up.
Using a rating system that includes "scrimmages" is not a credible source.

Ok, that is the best answer I've gotten so far. It doesn't actually answer the question, but I'll take it.