Guess what?

MikeDamone

I was right.

TierbsHsotBoobs

No.

Washington had ten win talent all along.

MikeDamone

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

No.

Washington had ten win talent all along.

Stop twisting. Don't make me bump 2 month old threads.

TierbsHsotBoobs

MikeDamone said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

No.

Washington had ten win talent all along.

Stop twisting. Don't make me bump 2 month old threads.

Should have beaten Stanford and Arizona. Maybe ASU too.

IrishDawg22

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

MikeDamone said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

No.

Washington had ten win talent all along.

Stop twisting. Don't make me bump 2 month old threads.

Should have beaten Stanford and Arizona. Maybe ASU too.

No maybe on ASU. Down 10-7 in the 4th (12:56) they start gauging ASU up the middle with Shaq/Cooper for big chunks to get 1st goal @ the 8 yd line. They get 6 yards up the middle on the next two plays, then Smith calls the only outside play on the drive (@ their 2 yard line) and we lose 4 yards on a pitch play and settle for a FG. They should have been up 14-10 with 7 minutes left, and then on the final drive Williams doesn't need to force things for a TD and the run game would have still been in play.

MikeDamone

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

MikeDamone said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

No.

Washington had ten win talent all along.

Stop twisting. Don't make me bump 2 month old threads.

Should have beaten Stanford and Arizona. Maybe ASU too.

But didn't.

DerekJohnson

Eastern could legitimately claim the same thing toward us.

RaceBannon

We had the talent to compete with anyone

CuntWaffle

RaceBannon said:

We had the talent to compete with anyone

Season was a complete failure.

TierbsHsotBoobs

MikeDamone said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

MikeDamone said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

No.

Washington had ten win talent all along.

Stop twisting. Don't make me bump 2 month old threads.

Should have beaten Stanford and Arizona. Maybe ASU too.

But didn't.

Coaching matters and Peterman's game management was shaky at best.

Illinois was UW's best win.

AtomicDawg

After the Stanford game anyone with half a brain saw what was coming with the season. Doesn't mean you shouldn't have done better with talent that was here.

Staff needs to attend a clinic on how to incorporate the qb into the running game.

HuskyHalfBrain

I think it's Miley shying away from contact not keeping a single snap in zone read option.

Smiff is too retarded to call a designed QB draw play.

uzi

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

MikeDamone said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

MikeDamone said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

No.

Washington had ten win talent all along.

Stop twisting. Don't make me bump 2 month old threads.

Should have beaten Stanford and Arizona. Maybe ASU too.

But didn't.

Coaching matters and Peterman's game management was shaky at best.

Illinois was UW's best win.

Yep. Even last night when that swinging gate fake got called back because guys with the wrong #s were on the line. Shouldn't a detailed oriented coach have a staff that makes sure such details are right?

BayDawg

uzi said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

MikeDamone said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

MikeDamone said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

No.

Washington had ten win talent all along.

Stop twisting. Don't make me bump 2 month old threads.

Should have beaten Stanford and Arizona. Maybe ASU too.

But didn't.

Coaching matters and Peterman's game management was shaky at best.

Illinois was UW's best win.

Yep. Even last night when that swinging gate fake got called back because guys with the wrong #s were on the line. Shouldn't a detailed oriented coach have a staff that makes sure such details are right?

Has there been any clarification on that, and not just the dipshit in the booth last night?

I seem to remember teams covering kicks with skill guys on the line.

MikeDamone

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

MikeDamone said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

MikeDamone said:

No.

Washington had ten win talent all along.

Stop twisting. Don't make me bump 2 month old threads.

Should have beaten Stanford and Arizona. Maybe ASU too.

But didn't.

Coaching matters and Peterman's game management was shaky at best.

Illinois was UW's best win.


Exactly.

MikeDamone

AtomicDawg said:

After the Stanford game anyone with half a brain saw what was coming with the season. Doesn't mean you shouldn't have done better with talent that was here.

Staff needs to attend a clinic on how to incorporate the qb into the running game.

Except when i posted as much after stanford, fucking doogs would have none of it.

By the way, after arizona I said UW would win out including the bowl..... Tick tick tick.

CFetters_Nacho_Lover

BayDawg said:

uzi said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

MikeDamone said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

MikeDamone said:

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

No.

Washington had ten win talent all along.

Stop twisting. Don't make me bump 2 month old threads.

Should have beaten Stanford and Arizona. Maybe ASU too.

But didn't.

Coaching matters and Peterman's game management was shaky at best.

Illinois was UW's best win.

Yep. Even last night when that swinging gate fake got called back because guys with the wrong #s were on the line. Shouldn't a detailed oriented coach have a staff that makes sure such details are right?

Has there been any clarification on that, and not just the dipshit in the booth last night?

I seem to remember teams covering kicks with skill guys on the line.

Peterman talked about it in his post game. Said something about how far they lined up; didn't mention the jersey #s. I can only assume that Mike Pereira has some concussion issues of his own and was confused between NFL and college rules.