Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Breaking Down the Mickens Touchdown Run

Hardcore_HuskyHardcore_Husky Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 304 Swaye's Wigwam
edited November 2014 in Hardcore Husky Board
imageBreaking Down the Mickens Touchdown Run

CokeGreaterThanPepsi is back to provide an interesting breakdown of a sequence from last Saturday's game.

Read the full story here


Comments

  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    Gratius publis 1!1!1!!1!1!1
    image
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,515 Standard Supporter
    Good chit coke boat
  • topdawgnctopdawgnc Member Posts: 7,838

    Props to @GrundleStiltzkin for the GIF's!

    Glad there is one fucker who can figure out GIF's around here.
  • LoneStarDawgLoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,558 Founders Club
    Good analysis, those LBs were so fucking lost on the second play
  • CanardCanard Member Posts: 504
    brchco12 said:

    Good analysis, those LBs were so fucking lost on the second play

    That's the real key—Shitty Mark Banker led defense.
  • doogvilledoogville Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 1,220 Swaye's Wigwam
    Love it. Good stuff:
  • CFetters_Nacho_LoverCFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 31,009 Founders Club
    I think the same or similar fly-sweep look is what set up Daniels throwback TD.

    Good chit, pepsi.
  • H_DH_D Member Posts: 6,098
    It's no bubble screen for 3 yards, but it'll do.

    Good stuff cōk.
  • CanardCanard Member Posts: 504

    Canard said:

    brchco12 said:

    Good analysis, those LBs were so fucking lost on the second play

    That's the real key—Shitty Mark Banker led defense.
    I remember when Riley and Banker were the toast of the PAC 10.

    #hiiDawg
    The TV money has made them the burnt toast of the Pac-12.
  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    Canard said:

    brchco12 said:

    Good analysis, those LBs were so fucking lost on the second play

    That's the real key—Shitty Mark Banker led defense.
    I remember when Riley and Banker were the toast of the PAC 10.

    #hiiDawg
    I love talking to beaver fans about Riley. Most are happy he just coaches there at all and would never put him in the hot seat.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,954

    Canard said:

    brchco12 said:

    Good analysis, those LBs were so fucking lost on the second play

    That's the real key—Shitty Mark Banker led defense.
    I remember when Riley and Banker were the toast of the PAC 10.

    #hiiDawg
    I love talking to beaver fans about Riley. Most are happy he just coaches there at all and would never put him in the hot seat.
    So you are saying Riley to Oregon State is akin to Romar to the UW?
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,954
    Pepsi,

    YVBE.

    I echo the work that Grundle has done with the breakdowns on the GIFs.

    When it comes to the details, this is where you really start seeing it. Yes, some of it is in play calling. But really, details are tied into execution and doing the little things necessary to get the play to work.

    In the two play sequence above, credit obviously goes to Smith for using one play to set up the other. And in the second play, having the scheme of the play show one thing to the LBs who are reading the OL for their keys while the play goes the other direction. But the play is made by Campbell making a great block on the edge (something that will never show up in the stats but shows where Campbell provides value at the WR position) and by Perkins for busting his ass to spring the play with one of the best blocks you'll ever see from a TE in space.

    The details are that the sum of the parts is greater than the sum of the individual. The details are that the individual stats don't matter. The details are finding a way to make the 8 yard play on 3rd and 7 instead of making the move that might result in either a 5 yard gain or a 20 yard gain. It's understanding game situations. It's understanding time and circumstances (hardy har har re: Arizona).

    The play sequence is further encouraging because of those factors. You're starting to see the details show up far more frequently. It's definitely not perfect yet. But a well coached team is one that gets better each and every week. We're seeing that here.

    And let's be honest, there probably was a little Norman Dale in Chris Petersen this year in that he had to break the colts down a bit before they were ready to run like a well oiled machine.
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 5,237 Standard Supporter
    Good, no, great chit! I love that type of in-depth analysis and worth the dues.

    It was great seeing Hatchie and Perkins pulling too. I'm happy we get Perkins back but hope Hatchie (not spectacular but very solid) too difficult to replace.
Sign In or Register to comment.