Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Scott Eklund - expert analysis
Comments
-
Sefo could have used a RS year. Instead, hes got K. Price like happy feet for getting impaled behind a pathetic OLine.
He would have gotten that chance at UW instead of CU who blows their load too early on every recruit.
Old Mac at CSU (now UF) exploited this for 3 years (and slipped a rufie in Leach's bowl game victory)
Unrated RS- Senior roster full of Cort Dennisons > Lineup full of 2/3* "high ceiling" true freshmen.....
Sincerely,
Denver shitty CFB superiority guy. -
WSU tried to strong-arm him, and he told leach to fuck off. I know this for a fact. And if you think Colorado has a better group of receivers you are a bigger fucktard than I thought.RoadDawg55 said:
You wouldn't say any of this shit if you didn't have connections to Bellarmine. Simple fact. Right now, he's not very good.Dick_B said:RoadDawg55 said:
Liufau sucks. Good for 2 INT's a game. Troy Williams probably isn't very good either, but Williams >>>>>> Liufau as a prospect.Dick_B said:"Luifau is not a pac 12 guy- he is un-athletic." "Sark is on way better quarterbacks. "
Do we have an ignore in this bitch? I thought you were smart enough to not reach such a simplistic conclusion.
Sefo has like one guy on offense that would crack the 2-deeps at UW. If you can't see that, I can't help you. Lets also examine that Colorado has NO ONE on defense, so they are generally playing from behind- hence they have to throw it and everyone knows it. He's a sophomore that never got to redshirt, but OK- he sucks.
Colorado's WR's are probably better than UW's. Lifua had one offer out of high school. WSU and Oregon State didn't offer him. Troy Williams had a ton of offers from some of the best schools in the country. Real tough decision on who was the better prospect.
Sefo starts instead of miles and we win at least 2 more games. Simple fact. Especially if he was given a chance to redshirt.