FREE PUB!
Comments
-
good point
the script says Oregon controls their destiny and kills themselves in the foot in a very public fashion. -
The difference is, Oregon got their injured player back and improved because of it. Ohio St. lost their guy during the off season, and he won't be back until next season. Lets also not forget he had about a month of practice before the season started and he also had three prior non-conference games. It's not like he was thrown to the wolves.whatshouldicareabout said:
If they take injuries into account for Oregon losing an OL, then they should take into account Ohio State losing a Heisman front-runner QB.greenblood said:
And Virginia Tech is a powerhouseRaceBannon said:Then Ohio State should be ahead of Oregon. Winning at Michigan State is better. Bama and TCU have better conference wins. The pac 12 sucks. Winning at LSU is better than winning at Utah. Bama lost on the road to a top 5 team at the time. Oregon lost at home to a shitty team.
Bama plays Mississippi state and Auburn while Oregon plays Colorado and the Beavs
They jump Oregon rather easily
Imagine if Oregon played only 2 games with Mariota this year. That's what Ohio State is going through this season.
Taking account injuries is used to justify a loss that otherwise wouldn't happen now that the team is at full strength. Ohio State has the same QB that lost to Virginia Tech. You can't use that argument for Ohio St. when the same quarterback would be playing in the playoffs. Sorry but not the same thing.
-
When he's a freshman it isgreenblood said:
The difference is, Oregon got their injured player back and improved because of it. Ohio St. lost their guy during the off season, and he won't be back until next season. Taking account injuries is used to justify a loss that otherwise wouldn't happen now that the team is at full strength. Ohio State has the same QB that lost to Virginia Tech. You can't use that argument for Ohio St. when the same quarterback would be playing in the playoffs. Sorry but not the same thing.whatshouldicareabout said:
If they take injuries into account for Oregon losing an OL, then they should take into account Ohio State losing a Heisman front-runner QB.greenblood said:
And Virginia Tech is a powerhouseRaceBannon said:Then Ohio State should be ahead of Oregon. Winning at Michigan State is better. Bama and TCU have better conference wins. The pac 12 sucks. Winning at LSU is better than winning at Utah. Bama lost on the road to a top 5 team at the time. Oregon lost at home to a shitty team.
Bama plays Mississippi state and Auburn while Oregon plays Colorado and the Beavs
They jump Oregon rather easily
Imagine if Oregon played only 2 games with Mariota this year. That's what Ohio State is going through this season. -
Not really. This is the same Ohio St. quarterback that played in week 1, also against Virginia Tech, and will also play if they make the Playoffs. If Miller had gotten hurt, and has now come back, then you would have a point. But as it stands, it's the same team just the QB has progressed. I would say however, they do look good on the eye test. But right now it's not enoughRaceBannon said:
When he's a freshman it isgreenblood said:
The difference is, Oregon got their injured player back and improved because of it. Ohio St. lost their guy during the off season, and he won't be back until next season. Taking account injuries is used to justify a loss that otherwise wouldn't happen now that the team is at full strength. Ohio State has the same QB that lost to Virginia Tech. You can't use that argument for Ohio St. when the same quarterback would be playing in the playoffs. Sorry but not the same thing.whatshouldicareabout said:
If they take injuries into account for Oregon losing an OL, then they should take into account Ohio State losing a Heisman front-runner QB.greenblood said:
And Virginia Tech is a powerhouseRaceBannon said:Then Ohio State should be ahead of Oregon. Winning at Michigan State is better. Bama and TCU have better conference wins. The pac 12 sucks. Winning at LSU is better than winning at Utah. Bama lost on the road to a top 5 team at the time. Oregon lost at home to a shitty team.
Bama plays Mississippi state and Auburn while Oregon plays Colorado and the Beavs
They jump Oregon rather easily
Imagine if Oregon played only 2 games with Mariota this year. That's what Ohio State is going through this season. -
Off-season of pressing started early this year?
-
I'm beginning to miss the two team playoff. So much fucking dreck in CFB this year.
-
I miss having a bunch of great games on 1/1, having it be over, and the next day find out who the NC champion is. Really, who gives a fuck? It was more fun for me the old way. This is just a fucking mess that is the worst of all worlds.TierbsHsotBoobs said:I'm beginning to miss the two team playoff. So much fucking dreck in CFB this year.
Oh gee, people argued about it, big fucking deal. It was fun as hell. -
Way to Quook on.greenblood said:
The difference is, Oregon got their injured player back and improved because of it. Ohio St. lost their guy during the off season, and he won't be back until next season. Lets also not forget he had about a month of practice before the season started and he also had three prior non-conference games. It's not like he was thrown to the wolves.whatshouldicareabout said:
If they take injuries into account for Oregon losing an OL, then they should take into account Ohio State losing a Heisman front-runner QB.greenblood said:
And Virginia Tech is a powerhouseRaceBannon said:Then Ohio State should be ahead of Oregon. Winning at Michigan State is better. Bama and TCU have better conference wins. The pac 12 sucks. Winning at LSU is better than winning at Utah. Bama lost on the road to a top 5 team at the time. Oregon lost at home to a shitty team.
Bama plays Mississippi state and Auburn while Oregon plays Colorado and the Beavs
They jump Oregon rather easily
Imagine if Oregon played only 2 games with Mariota this year. That's what Ohio State is going through this season.
Taking account injuries is used to justify a loss that otherwise wouldn't happen now that the team is at full strength. Ohio State has the same QB that lost to Virginia Tech. You can't use that argument for Ohio St. when the same quarterback would be playing in the playoffs. Sorry but not the same thing.
But you're wrong on 2 counts.
So by your rationale, Oregon losing an O lineman was somehow more of a factor than tOSU losing their Heisman QB candidate. Whew!!!
You're also assuming that with your Olineman back, it's an automatic victory against a team that has torched your asses 2 years in a row.
There is no evidence of that since they plungered you last year at their house and beat you soundly despite the score, in your house this year.
The fact that Oregon is ranked #2 above at least 3 teams that would plunger them on a neutral field shows that this new playoff selection process will be a shit show in the end.
-
fUCKING SKANSI!!!!RaceBannon said:I like the 1981 Apple Cup script better
-
What a great day. Ron Cookie "Fucking" Jackson and when it was announced USC beat UCLA the place went nuts for the rest of the game. Fuck. I miss husky football and college football for that matter. It will never be the same. If that happened today after we found out about USC/Ucla they would put some fucking stupid shit with a fat asian chick on the screen and kill the mood.salemcoog said:
fUCKING SKANSI!!!!RaceBannon said:I like the 1981 Apple Cup script better





