Home› Hardcore Husky Board

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Sign In Register
Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Hey Kim, zona is #12 witb 2 and 3* talent

puppylove_sugarsteelpuppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
in Hardcore Husky Board
Maybe Petersen's 3-4* okg's might just damn be good enough to win with. Sark's 4-5* guys sure didnt work out so hot yoh little buttsniffing wino wannabe
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    How many 5* did Sark have?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNYHFNY Member Posts: 5,236 Standard Supporter
    There's a ton of 1 loss teams so if they all win out, it should come down to who has the most impressive wins.
    RoadDawg55 said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    How many 5* did Sark have?

    I think 3? That has always been one of the big myths. He really didn't get any more big time guys than other UW coaches.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MrsPetersenMrsPetersen Member Posts: 724
    RoadDawg55 said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    How many 5* did Sark have?

    I think 3? That has always been one of the big myths. He really didn't get any more big time guys than other UW coaches.
    Three: Shaq, ASJ, Kasen
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KenNDKenND Member Posts: 272
    edited October 2014
    doogsinparadise said:

    How many 5* did Sark have?

    Depends on whether you want to use the Dawgman-inflated Scout.com rankings. Shaq was universally considered to be a 5-star. Kasen and ASJ were 4-stars on Rivals.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • doogsinparadisedoogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    KenND said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    KenND said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    How many 5* did Sark have?

    Depends on whether you want to use the Dawgman-inflated Scout.com rankings. Shaq was universally considered to be a 5-star. Kasen and ASJ were 4-stars.
    This.

    And we paid 500k + a boat for Shaq.
    Kim and F3 got Chris Izbicki rated as a 5-star for gods sake.
    King County All-Stars.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KenNDKenND Member Posts: 272
    RoadDawg55 said:

    KenND said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    KenND said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    How many 5* did Sark have?

    Depends on whether you want to use the Dawgman-inflated Scout.com rankings. Shaq was universally considered to be a 5-star. Kasen and ASJ were 4-stars.
    This.

    And we paid 500k + a boat for Shaq.
    Kim and F3 got Chris Izbicki rated as a 5-star for gods sake.
    You are giving Kim and F3 way too much credit. Scout know that they are idiots. They don't do the rankings.
    To be clear, I don't think that those two do the rankings. What I do think that they do is pressure the guys who are doing the rankings to inflate a ranking here or there in order to create some buzz and sell subscriptions. All of the team sites do it.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicPissAtomicPiss Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,747 Founders Club
    The who's who in Seattle sports
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KenNDKenND Member Posts: 272
    KenND said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    KenND said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    KenND said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    How many 5* did Sark have?

    Depends on whether you want to use the Dawgman-inflated Scout.com rankings. Shaq was universally considered to be a 5-star. Kasen and ASJ were 4-stars.
    This.

    And we paid 500k + a boat for Shaq.
    Kim and F3 got Chris Izbicki rated as a 5-star for gods sake.
    You are giving Kim and F3 way too much credit. Scout know that they are idiots. They don't do the rankings.
    To be clear, I don't think that those two do the rankings. What I do think that they do is pressure the guys who are doing the rankings to inflate a ranking here or there in order to create some buzz and sell subscriptions. All of the team sites do it.
    To add to this, the Chris Izbicki 5-star ranking was one of the most transparent examples of ranking inflation. I still see fans of other teams who follow recruiting mention it on occasion when talking about how retarded that Scout.com is.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123
    KenND said:

    KenND said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    KenND said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    KenND said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    How many 5* did Sark have?

    Depends on whether you want to use the Dawgman-inflated Scout.com rankings. Shaq was universally considered to be a 5-star. Kasen and ASJ were 4-stars.
    This.

    And we paid 500k + a boat for Shaq.
    Kim and F3 got Chris Izbicki rated as a 5-star for gods sake.
    You are giving Kim and F3 way too much credit. Scout know that they are idiots. They don't do the rankings.
    To be clear, I don't think that those two do the rankings. What I do think that they do is pressure the guys who are doing the rankings to inflate a ranking here or there in order to create some buzz and sell subscriptions. All of the team sites do it.
    To add to this, the Chris Izbicki 5-star ranking was one of the most transparent examples of ranking inflation. I still see fans of other teams who follow recruiting mention it on occasion when talking about how retarded that Scout.com is.
    I know Chris a little bit and played against him. He was never anything special. A solid high school player, nothing more.

    Fetters wrote articles on a kid from my high school team that was a third string TE who never caught a pass. He said the TE oozed potential. He got a two star ranking because he was 6'4" 220 and went to Barton and another regional combine and ran a 4.8.

    Zach Banner was another head scratcher. He had tons of offers too. I know he was huge and had great bloodlines, but I saw a 5'10" 200 pound kid from White River dominate him all game long. The kid from White River had like 3 or 4 sacks and a handful of other QB pressures and tackles for loss. At least he had some potential and started for USC, but I was shocked he was rated for high. The #11 ranked tackle should be dominant imo.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MeekMeek Member Posts: 7,031
    RoadDawg55 said:

    KenND said:

    KenND said:

    RoadDawg55 said:

    KenND said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    KenND said:

    doogsinparadise said:

    How many 5* did Sark have?

    Depends on whether you want to use the Dawgman-inflated Scout.com rankings. Shaq was universally considered to be a 5-star. Kasen and ASJ were 4-stars.
    This.

    And we paid 500k + a boat for Shaq.
    Kim and F3 got Chris Izbicki rated as a 5-star for gods sake.
    You are giving Kim and F3 way too much credit. Scout know that they are idiots. They don't do the rankings.
    To be clear, I don't think that those two do the rankings. What I do think that they do is pressure the guys who are doing the rankings to inflate a ranking here or there in order to create some buzz and sell subscriptions. All of the team sites do it.
    To add to this, the Chris Izbicki 5-star ranking was one of the most transparent examples of ranking inflation. I still see fans of other teams who follow recruiting mention it on occasion when talking about how retarded that Scout.com is.
    I know Chris a little bit and played against him. He was never anything special. A solid high school player, nothing more.

    Fetters wrote articles on a kid from my high school team that was a third string TE who never caught a pass. He said the TE oozed potential. He got a two star ranking because he was 6'4" 220 and went to Barton and another regional combine and ran a 4.8.

    Zach Banner was another head scratcher. He had tons of offers too. I know he was huge and had great bloodlines, but I saw a 5'10" 200 pound kid from White River dominate him all game long. The kid from White River had like 3 or 4 sacks and a handful of other QB pressures and tackles for loss. At least he had some potential and started for USC, but I was shocked he was rated for high. The #11 ranked tackle should be dominant imo.
    so you're like 25 years old? damn, i thought you were a wise old football veteran. #BubblePopped
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MrsPetersenMrsPetersen Member Posts: 724
    I don't recall Chris Izbicki ever being a 5* and his final scout rating was a 4* (which was clearly pushing it too).

    http://washington.scout.com/a.z?s=147&p=8&c=1&nid=2329304

    Kavario Middleton was the only 5* Tyrone ever got.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • AtomicPissAtomicPiss Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 64,747 Founders Club
    Jake wasn't a 5 star?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaccoonHarryRaccoonHarry Member Posts: 2,161
    Cody Bruns as a 4 star will always be one of my favs. Another F3 classic.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sarktasticsarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    according to Rivals pac-12 recruiting rankings Washington vs. Arizona

    2010 UW 6 UA 9

    2011 UW 5 UA 8 *Stoops fired. UA posts 4-8 record

    2012 UW 5 UA 11 *Rich Rod hired in December, 2011. UA posts 8-5 record

    2013 UW 3 UA 7

    2014 UW 7 UA 6
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CokeGreaterThanPepsiCokeGreaterThanPepsi Member Posts: 7,646
    Go look at the #1 team in the nation right now (Mississippi State) and check out their recruits from the past classes. Most of their key contributors are 3* players
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
Sign In or Register to comment.