The arrow is pointing up for UW. No really, it is.

creepycoug

Gladstone said:

Please explain how 2012 ND didn't deserve to be in the title game. I look forward to shredding your argument into little pieces.

You talkin' to me?

Well, first, because they've had their table set so often in the past, what with free admission to bowl games they didn't belong in, they should have forfeited their first legitimate shot just for reparation.

Second, I don't like them.

Third, it took them 16 over-times to finally beat a 500 Pitt team that finished second to last in the weaker division of the worst conference in the BCS. They couldn't even beat Miami, which was and is on life support.

You couldn't shred chicken if I pressure cooked it for a week. But I will nonetheless enjoy watching you fumble around as you try to dismantle my fortress of logic and sound reasoning.

Jave

RoadDawg55 said:

Brian Kelly is a good reference point. 8 wins, 8 wins, then 12 and a title game appearance. I also think year 3 will be when Petersen breaks through.

Yea that was a pretty impressive showing against Alabama.

KenND

Jave said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Brian Kelly is a good reference point. 8 wins, 8 wins, then 12 and a title game appearance. I also think year 3 will be when Petersen breaks through.

Yea that was a pretty impressive showing against Alabama.

No matter how you slice it, getting hammered in the NC game is better than losing to Boise State in the Las Vegas bowl.

PurpleBaze

KenND said:

Jave said:

RoadDawg55 said:

Brian Kelly is a good reference point. 8 wins, 8 wins, then 12 and a title game appearance. I also think year 3 will be when Petersen breaks through.

Yea that was a pretty impressive showing against Alabama.

No matter how you slice it, getting hammered in the NC game is better than losing to Boise State in the Las Vegas bowl.

Perfect the lawnmower, the pop off.

PurpleJ

It's sad to see how far Notre Dame has fallen.

KenND

PurpleJ said:

It's sad to see how far Notre Dame has fallen.

Agreed.