HuskyFanPodcast: UW/UO Review, UW/ASU Preview
Comments
-
Good for RoadDawg for sticking by his boy Miles.
And I thought my Jack H Lockner obsession was an issue... -
It's not that I can't quit him. He doesn't look like a very good QB. I just find it stupid that some are anointing Williams and acting like he really showed something in garbage time. It's fucking ridiculous. Just say you are sick of Miles and want to see another guy get a shot.ThomasFremont said:Good for RoadDawg for sticking by his boy Miles.
And I thought my Jack H Lockner obsession was an issue... -
I just wanted Miles to fail so you could be wrong.RoadDawg55 said:
It's not that I can't quit him. He doesn't look like a very good QB. I just find it stupid that some are anointing Williams and acting like he really showed something in garbage time. It's fucking ridiculous. Just say you are sick of Miles and want to see another guy get a shot.ThomasFremont said:Good for RoadDawg for sticking by his boy Miles.
And I thought my Jack H Lockner obsession was an issue... -
What can I say, when you're good you're good.CokeGreaterThanPepsi said:
I love how you said GLAA literally 10 seconds after a podcast over an hour long was uploaded. I love this bored. Well done!biak1 said:GLAA
-
Mom won't let me use the computer because of all the porn viruses so I'm using the phone for it. Good chit thus far. I don't really think the raw talent gap between Oregon and is real large at all (okay, this year they do have a big edge in skill guys this particular yr ). Most of it is mental. I hate to say it but it might take until year three for the soft mentality to break.
-
The problem I had with this podcast is only one of them actually saw the ASU-Stanford game and they spent the majority of the time on Washington, with zero insightful reasearch or information on ASU out side of stats anyone can get. Mainly opinions and egos. Did get volumes on the woes of the Dawgs offense which is dead last in the PAC 12 passing yardage it appears. Does ASU's defense even have to perform at an average level to stop them scoring anyhow? Good stuff for a Devil fan to learn about your team but not ASU. I do agree with Berc being possibly a better choice to counter the issues with Washington's secondary. Graham did say he could use both depending on the situation. I would never say ASU is going to win ten games even with being down one less game than Washington, but Road Dog sure does with your biggest win being Cal? For people that are uber critcial it is a tad too like a homer than I expected from these fellas. As for the sense of entitlement of ASU fans while being underachievers, have you looked at your own program over the last ten years? If you lose on Saturday to ASU you will be 0-20 to the Ducks and Sundevils. I see tons on Don James mentions but most of us have moved on from Frank Kush. The good news to me is, over the next couple years both programs will be contenders. Scout ranks our recruiting class right now #24. Just like Stanford, the stength are ASU's offense to Washington's defense, well make that the defensive line.
-
Go do your own podcast then pop off.Sundevil76 said:The problem I had with this podcast is only one of them actually saw the ASU-Stanford game and they spent the majority of the time on Washington, with zero insightful reasearch or information on ASU out side of stats anyone can get. Mainly opinions and egos. Did get volumes on the woes of the Dawgs offense which is dead last in the PAC 12 passing yardage it appears. Does ASU's defense even have to perform at an average level to stop them scoring anyhow? Good stuff for a Devil fan to learn about your team but not ASU. I do agree with Berc being possibly a better choice to counter the issues with Washington's secondary. Graham did say he could use both depending on the situation. I would never say ASU is going to win ten games even with being down one less game than Washington, but Road Dog sure does with your biggest win being Cal? For people that are uber critcial it is a tad too like a homer than I expected from these fellas. As for the sense of entitlement of ASU fans while being underachievers, have you looked at your own program over the last ten years? If you lose on Saturday to ASU you will be 0-20 to the Ducks and Sundevils. I see tons on Don James mentions but most of us have moved on from Frank Kush. The good news to me is, over the next couple years both programs will be contenders. Scout ranks our recruiting class right now #24. Just like Stanford, the stength are ASU's offense to Washington's defense, well make that the defensive line.
-
As for the one commentator that did see the ASU- Stanford game his summary was something like this: Hogan is off, the whole Cardinal team played sloppy, Graham out schemed Shaw, and the Devils primarily scored on turn overs. That is all true, but the offense was good enough to move the ball against the #1 defense to be able to make 4 of 5 field goals. Some of those 3 points are seven on a weaker defense. Stanford is a pretty good team, even if not the same as last year when you consider they have played Washington on the road and won, close with the Irish in South Bend, and should have beat USC at home. In looking at the Dawgs schedule, you have not got it done against Oregon or Stanford, so you can't blow off ASU's defense so freely while using a 2nd string QB. Never saw a mention of the scheme change on the defensive line that is worked well and is going to used in this game? The defense has improved when considering the level of competition the last couple games, at least good enough for wins. Foster is a threat and UCLA, USC, and Stanford keyed on Foster. Lewis actually had a pretty good night running, something that was not touched on either.
-
TL,DR summary:Sundevil76 said:As for the one commentator that did see the ASU- Stanford game his summary was something like this: Hogan is off, the whole Cardinal team played sloppy, Graham out schemed Shaw, and the Devils primarily scored on turn overs. That is all true, but the offense was good enough to move the ball against the #1 defense to be able to make 4 of 5 field goals. Some of those 3 points are seven on a weaker defense. Stanford is a pretty good team, even if not the same as last year when you consider they have played Washington on the road and won, close with the Irish in South Bend, and should have beat USC at home. In looking at the Dawgs schedule, you have not got it done against Oregon or Stanford, so you can't blow off ASU's defense so freely while using a 2nd string QB. The defense has improved when considering the level of competition the last couple games, at least good enough for a wins. Foster is a threat and all three teams loaded up to stop him running. Lewis has a pretty good night running, something that was not touched on either.
Stanford SUCKS. -
Hey chest and road? Can I change my pick?Sundevil76 said:As for the one commentator that did see the ASU- Stanford game his summary was something like this: Hogan is off, the whole Cardinal team played sloppy, Graham out schemed Shaw, and the Devils primarily scored on turn overs. That is all true, but the offense was good enough to move the ball against the #1 defense to be able to make 4 of 5 field goals. Some of those 3 points are seven on a weaker defense. Stanford is a pretty good team, even if not the same as last year when you consider they have played Washington on the road and won, close with the Irish in South Bend, and should have beat USC at home. In looking at the Dawgs schedule, you have not got it done against Oregon or Stanford, so you can't blow off ASU's defense so freely while using a 2nd string QB. Never saw a mention of the scheme change on the defensive line that is worked well and is going to used in this game? The defense has improved when considering the level of competition the last couple games, at least good enough for wins. Foster is a threat and UCLA, USC, and Stanford keyed on Foster. Lewis actually had a pretty good night running, something that was not touched on either.
