Ejection.
Comments
-
Football should be illegal
-
So Perkins is out for the first half against Oregon. For making a perfectly legal, shoulder-to-shoulder block.
"Defenseless player" is an oxymoron. -
He was bullying. Rape culture. Not classy.
-
I blame Obama.
-
So a defender, pursuing Ross, is unblockable? What the Fuck? That guy was chasing Ross when Perkins put his shoulder into him. That call was almost as bad as the Oregon onside kick recovery.
-
Might be an even worse call than the PI on Peters.
-
Peters gets away with lots of shit. You know that. But the refs suck baluts as always. We never know what they see because it's not what we usually see.
-
Especially when the player is facing the ball carrier and attempting to tackle the ball carrier.TTJ said:
"Defenseless player" is an oxymoron. -
Cal player was obviously too small to hit/block.
-
Fucking Pac 12 refs just continue to deliver.
Watch the physical "coverage" that was allowed in the Stanford game last night and compare it to what Peters got called for. Kinda hard to determine what a DB can do from watching film of conference games.
That crackback bullshit was wrong in every way. It's really funny to see all the bullshit that went on there and realize that the final result of the play should have been UW ball at about the 50 where Ross got tackled. -
we need coaches from other leagues (any league for gawd's sake) to ref our games - fire all of our shit officials and pay the other guys what we'd pay the PAC refs. At their best they are bad.
-
Is there any way to appeal this? How do you justify sitting him for the first half of Oregon?
-
I blame Bush! That basatard!!!
-
g
Give Sir Dickhead Scott a jingle. I am sure he'd be happy to oblige you.no_uh said:Is there any way to appeal this? How do you justify sitting him for the first half of Oregon?
-
Yes, the first half suspension can be overturned.no_uh said:Is there any way to appeal this? How do you justify sitting him for the first half of Oregon?
-
It looked so dangerous though. The announcers all said in this day and age of college football, if it looks dangerous, the referees are going to air on the side of caution...you know, to protect the athlete.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Yes, the first half suspension can be overturned.no_uh said:Is there any way to appeal this? How do you justify sitting him for the first half of Oregon?
-
Chickenshit!. Now he's gone 1st half next week. Wasnt targeting. He used his shoulder. Or was it 2nd half? Either way should have been reversed.
-
I had stopped watching. Was the ejection reviewed?H_D said:
It looked so dangerous though. The announcers all said in this day and age of college football, if it looks dangerous, the referees are going to air on the side of caution...you know, to protect the athlete.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Yes, the first half suspension can be overturned.no_uh said:Is there any way to appeal this? How do you justify sitting him for the first half of Oregon?
-
They never said if they reviewed it. But that's only because it took them 10 minutes to sort out the fumble.
-
I doubt he will be out for the 1st half. They should appeal it and Perkins should be able to play.
-
Are you talking about the Pac-12 referee organization? Pretty bold statement you are making there.RoadDawg55 said:I doubt he will be out for the 1st half. They should appeal it and Perkins should be able to play.
-
Can we get the name of the official who thew the flag? I would like to throw him off the Aurora bridge upon his next visit to Seattle.
-
Hopefully he wins the appeal, that was the cherry on top of the officials shit sandwich they fed us today.
-
Fucking A.TTJ said:
"Defenseless player" is an oxymoron.
Defend yourself, asshole, or go play soccer.
If you get your fuckin' head taken off, it's probably because you weren't paying attention, not because you're "defenseless".
-
I've learned to roll with most of the shitty, inconsistent calls but that was a really harsh toke. Targeting??..presumably they reviewed the video and upheld the ejection??... I'll be shocked if they appeal it and win if for no other reason than the fact that Perkins is a difference maker.
-
Welcome.Dugdawg said:I've learned to roll with most of the shitty, inconsistent calls but that was a really harsh toke. Targeting??..presumably they reviewed the video and upheld the ejection??... I'll be shocked if they appeal it and win if for no other reason than the fact that Perkins is a difference maker.
LEAVE!!!! -
This. Name that cocksucker.Homebrew_Dawg said:Can we get the name of the official who thew the flag? I would like to throw him off the Aurora bridge upon his next visit to Seattle.
