When Sark goes 7-6 this year, we better throw 3 to 4 million at Mora. I don't give a shit what his record is this year. For all the bullshit doogs say about how Sark "gets it", Mora actually "gets it." If any lurking dawgman cuntwaffle needs proof, look at his OL class from last year.
if Mora goes 2-10 and winless in the conference, I for one don't want Woodward throwing $4 a year million at him. <<<< faggoty wink
I find myself wondering if Mora would even bother with Pool Boy.
I remember when I was in Woodward's office interviewing him for Bow Down to Willingham. I asked about him meeting with Mora, and he cut me off and said he never had a meeting with Mora. But I knew from my other sources that he had been offered the UW job in Nov 2008. So I did a double take and started to zero in on that and said something like "But I know for a fact that..." , and Woodward smirked and said, "I said I never met with him..."
He went on to say he wasn't going to go into details but needless to say Mora was a former Husky and as such his opinion was highly valued as they pursued a new coach.
When Sark goes 7-6 this year, we better throw 3 to 4 million at Mora. I don't give a shit what his record is this year. For all the bullshit doogs say about how Sark "gets it", Mora actually "gets it." If any lurking dawgman cuntwaffle needs proof, look at his OL class from last year.
When Sark goes 7-6 this year, we better throw 3 to 4 million at Mora. I don't give a shit what his record is this year. For all the bullshit doogs say about how Sark "gets it", Mora actually "gets it." If any lurking dawgman cuntwaffle needs proof, look at his OL class from last year.
if Mora goes 2-10 and winless in the conference, I for one don't want Woodward throwing $4 a year million at him. <<<< faggoty wink </p>
UCLA has a brutal schedule this year playing @ Nebraska, @ UO, @ Stanford and @USC plus Oregon, ASU, Arizona and UW at home. Their defense wasn't that great and their offense lost their two best skill guys. I think its a good team headed in the right direction but this year could take a step back. I wouldnt be surprised if they went 7-5.
UCLA has a brutal schedule this year playing @ Nebraska, @ UO, @ Stanford and @USC plus Oregon, ASU, Arizona and UW at home. Their defense wasn't that great and their offense lost their two best skill guys. I think its a good team headed in the right direction but this year could take a step back. I wouldnt be surprised if they went 7-5.
UCLA has a brutal schedule this year playing @ Nebraska, @ UO, @ Stanford and @USC plus Oregon, ASU, Arizona and UW at home. Their defense wasn't that great and their offense lost their two best skill guys. I think its a good team headed in the right direction but this year could take a step back. I wouldnt be surprised if they went 7-5.
I kind of hope UCLA goes 7-5 to see Kim and all the doogs go "See told you so!" about Mora nevermind Sark won 7 games 3 years in a row and by then it will be four years in a row.
UCLA has a brutal schedule this year playing @ Nebraska, @ UO, @ Stanford and @USC plus Oregon, ASU, Arizona and UW at home. Their defense wasn't that great and their offense lost their two best skill guys. I think its a good team headed in the right direction but this year could take a step back. I wouldnt be surprised if they went 7-5.
You included Washington in that?
UCLA is probably the easiest of the 4 conference road games. They have the weakest home field advantage and have had trouble blowing out people at home. Its also late in the season. If they already have 3-4 losses by then they won't have as much to play for.
UCLA has a brutal schedule this year playing @ Nebraska, @ UO, @ Stanford and @USC plus Oregon, ASU, Arizona and UW at home. Their defense wasn't that great and their offense lost their two best skill guys. I think its a good team headed in the right direction but this year could take a step back. I wouldnt be surprised if they went 7-5.
You included Washington in that?
UCLA is probably the easiest of the 4 conference road games. They have the weakest home field advantage and have had trouble blowing out people at home. Its also late in the season. If they already have 3-4 losses by then they won't have as much to play for.
UCLA has a brutal schedule this year playing @ Nebraska, @ UO, @ Stanford and @USC plus Oregon, ASU, Arizona and UW at home. Their defense wasn't that great and their offense lost their two best skill guys. I think its a good team headed in the right direction but this year could take a step back. I wouldnt be surprised if they went 7-5.
You included Washington in that?
Its also late in the season. If they only have 0-2 losses by then they will have a lot to play for.
I think Oregon State will probably be an easier game than UCLA. Oregon State lost Wheaton at WR, and he was their best player on offense. They also lost Poyer at CB and he was first team Pac 12.
Hundley is the type of QB we always get destroyed by. He's mobile and accurate. When you combine that with a sub par pass rush and a road game (we will suck on the road again this year), I can't us winning that one.
There is no need to look at the schedule and predict. Sark will win 7 games, doesn't matter who is on there.
BSU - L UIUC - M ISU - W UA - M SU - L UO - L ASU - M Cal - W CU - W UCLA -L OSU - L WSU - M
If we assume each maybe is a 50% chance (and wins and losses are of course guaranteed) then that is a 5-7 season there. Right back where we started. Remember progress is incremental and non-linear. Sometimes a little bit of regression is necessary... that is what makes 2013 so special. We are going backwards but it is still progress, or at least that is what I am hearing.
There is no need to look at the schedule and predict. Sark will win 7 games, doesn't matter who is on there.
BSU - L UIUC - M ISU - W UA - M SU - L UO - L ASU - M Cal - W CU - W UCLA -L OSU - L WSU - M
If we assume each maybe is a 50% chance (and wins and losses are of course guaranteed) then that is a 5-7 season there. Right back where we started. Remember progress is incremental and non-linear. Sometimes a little bit of regression is necessary... that is what makes 2013 so special. We are going backwards but it is still progress, or at least that is what I am hearing.
There is no need to look at the schedule and predict. Sark will win 7 games, doesn't matter who is on there.
BSU - L UIUC - M ISU - W UA - M SU - L UO - L ASU - M Cal - W CU - W UCLA -L OSU - L WSU - M
If we assume each maybe is a 50% chance (and wins and losses are of course guaranteed) then that is a 5-7 season there. Right back where we started. Remember progress is incremental and non-linear. Sometimes a little bit of regression is necessary... that is what makes 2013 so special. We are going backwards but it is still progress, or at least that is what I am hearing.
BSU- W Illinois- W ISU- W UA- W Stanford- Plunger rape loss Oregon- Plunger rape loss ASU- Loss Cal- Win Colorado- Win UCLA- Plunger rape loss Oregon State- Close loss WSU- W
There is no need to look at the schedule and predict. Sark will win 7 games, doesn't matter who is on there.
BSU - L UIUC - M ISU - W UA - M SU - L UO - L ASU - M Cal - W CU - W UCLA -L OSU - L WSU - M
If we assume each maybe is a 50% chance (and wins and losses are of course guaranteed) then that is a 5-7 season there. Right back where we started. Remember progress is incremental and non-linear. Sometimes a little bit of regression is necessary... that is what makes 2013 so special. We are going backwards but it is still progress, or at least that is what I am hearing.
BSU- W Illinois- W ISU- W UA- W Stanford- Plunger rape loss Oregon- Plunger rape loss ASU- Loss Cal- Win Colorado- Win UCLA- Plunger rape loss Oregon State- Close loss WSU- W
We'll win 7 games once again.
Basically how I see it as well. Maybe we win one of the conference road games and blow a game to Arizona or Boise State, but 7-5 seems accurate to me. The worst part is, when we beat San Jose State on the Poinsetta Bowl, some will call it progress.
Comments
Pretty sure he has a CONTRACT.
HTH.
No thanks.
Hundley is the type of QB we always get destroyed by. He's mobile and accurate. When you combine that with a sub par pass rush and a road game (we will suck on the road again this year), I can't us winning that one.
UIUC - M
ISU - W
UA - M
SU - L
UO - L
ASU - M
Cal - W
CU - W
UCLA -L
OSU - L
WSU - M
If we assume each maybe is a 50% chance (and wins and losses are of course guaranteed)
then that is a 5-7 season there. Right back where we started. Remember progress is incremental and non-linear. Sometimes a little bit of regression is necessary... that is what makes 2013 so special. We are going backwards but it is still progress, or at least that is what I am hearing.
Illinois- W
ISU- W
UA- W
Stanford- Plunger rape loss
Oregon- Plunger rape loss
ASU- Loss
Cal- Win
Colorado- Win
UCLA- Plunger rape loss
Oregon State- Close loss
WSU- W
We'll win 7 games once again.