Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

One lackluster recruiting projection.

13

Comments

  • Swaye
    Swaye Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 41,741 Founders Club
    bananasnblondes said:

    Remember, Kim says that this year will be a top 10 recruiting class even though he only expects us to take 16 guys. I believe this is close to a statistical impossibility since we have already taken 4 mid-level 3 star guys.

    Romar math?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,573
    edited July 2013
    bananasnblondes said:

    Remember, Kim says that this year will be a top 10 recruiting class even though he only expects us to take 16 guys. I believe this is close to a statistical impossibility since we have already taken 4 mid-level 3 star guys.

    Yes, but top 10 of what? Pac 12? This is classic Kimmy 101. Just watch, UW finishes 7th in the Pac 12, and Kim will go with the "See top 10 in the Pac 12" garbage.

    Or he'll just say it is top 10 in the country, because those recruiting sites really don't know anything and don't take into account "potential" of diamond in the rough good character guys. Even though his own Marxist website will have a mediocre grade for the Husky class.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,553 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited July 2013
    bananasnblondes said:

    Remember, Kim says that this year will be a top 10 recruiting class even though he only expects us to take 16 guys. I believe this is close to a statistical impossibility since we have already taken 4 mid-level 3 star guys.

    Everyone on this board already knows how stupid Kim is, but saying we will take 16 is retarded. Someone on dawgman pointed out we have 12 seniors plus ASJ, there is 13. I could name at least another 10 guys that I would say have a 50/50 chance at making it to next year. We have a lot of dead weight from our first few recruiting classes. Not all of them will become attrition, but some of them will. Then, there is the incoming freshmen. At least 2 or 3 of those guys will get homesick, fail classes, or become discouraged and quit when they are 4th on the depth chart. It happens every year. This moron really thinks only 3 guys will retire early, get suddenly seniored, quit, flunk out, etc?

    It's not anything new, but it drives me crazy that a fucking idiot like Kim runs the biggest UW football website. He never has any fucking clue about anything. We will take at least 20.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    bananasnblondes said:

    Remember, Kim says that this year will be a top 10 recruiting class even though he only expects us to take 16 guys. I believe this is close to a statistical impossibility since we have already taken 4 mid-level 3 star guys.

    Kim will just say his usual bull shit line. "Look guys I was just reporting what I was hearing. I was hearing UW was going to get a top 10 class. Why do you guys never come on here and tell me about all the times I've been right? You might want to take a step back from the key board for a while. "
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    bananasnblondes said:

    Remember, Kim says that this year will be a top 10 recruiting class even though he only expects us to take 16 guys. I believe this is close to a statistical impossibility since we have already taken 4 mid-level 3 star guys.

    Also, UW won't be taking a QB this year.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    also RB depth is contingent on a guy who has blown out 3 ACLs in 2.5 years
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Meek said:

    also RB depth is contingent on a guy who has blown out 3 ACLs in 2.5 years

    I don't think it's been brought up but what is UW going to do in 2014 if Sankey declares after this year?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Meek said:

    also RB depth is contingent on a guy who has blown out 3 ACLs in 2.5 years

    I don't think it's been brought up but what is UW going to do in 2014 if Sankey declares after this year?

    Declares what? His major? He isn't going to the NFL early, and likely never.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,641

    I don't think it's been brought up but what is UW going to do in 2014 if Sankey declares after this year?



    Dwayne Washington, Lavon Coleman, Ryan McDaniel and Deontae Cooper (maybe) will be the backups this year. You also still have Jesse Callier. They'll take one or two guys this year as well. Running back is a position where you can usually tell right away how good someone is going to be. If they suck as a freshman, they probably won't be that good (case in point: Dezden Petty and Eric Wilson from last year)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    MikeDamone said:

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    Meek said:

    also RB depth is contingent on a guy who has blown out 3 ACLs in 2.5 years

    I don't think it's been brought up but what is UW going to do in 2014 if Sankey declares after this year?

    Declares what? His major? He isn't going to the NFL early, and likely never.
    He's an RB with good speed and had a good year last year. If he does it again I can see him bolting.

    As an RB if you have the chance to leave I would since you have a short shelf life. Why I was surprised Polk came back after 2010.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter