The game @ Cal is a HUGE test for Petamus (oh fuck)

PostGameOrangeSlices

I'm 81% certain that if Sark was still coaching, we would lose this game (given his road record and Cal's offensive proficiency this year).

If Peterton is who we think he is, UW should win this game rather easily. But the inexperienced secondary could prove disastrous.

If the offense has another GSU first half/Hawaii game type of performance, Cal is going to plunger the fightin' Doogs. I'm legitimately worried about this game, whether or not Cal wins @ WSU this week.

Someone convince me that our team full of players that have always sucked on the road will suddenly not suck on the road. They're going to be having flashbacks of Sark.

MikeDamone

You mean like at cal in 2012? <-------faggoty wink.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Sark was 5-0 against Cal.

PostGameOrangeSlices

MikeDamone said:

You mean like at cal in 2012? <-------faggoty wink. </p>

This years Cal > 2012 Cal

And our secondary was pretty solid in 2012

PostGameOrangeSlices

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Sark was 5-0 against Cal.

Tedford.

Nuff said on dat.

Homebrew_Dawg

I'm 19% (100-81% for those without an abacus) certain the secondary does well at Cal. They're very young and inexperienced, but improving. I more concerned about Miles' happy feet syndrome spreading to others on the offensive side of the program, i.e., panic and indecision.

MikeDamone

The fact the cal game is even being questioned speaks volumes.

UWerentThereMan

MikeDamone said:

You mean like at cal in 2012? ===D <-------faggoty wink. </p>

PostGameOrangeSlices

UWerentThereMan said:

MikeDamone said:

You mean like at cal in 2012? ===D <-------faggoty wink. </p>

solid looking hash oil, do want

haie

MacIntyre had a belly laugh over this thread.

Tequilla

I'm optimistic with the growth we're seeing in the defense ...

The offense??? I have absolutely no clue what we're going to see.

Until we can get an actual read on what kind of consistent offense we're going to have, we've got problems that we hope that the defense and special teams can bail us out on.

uzi

Even if our D stops Cal... can our O score?

The best thing we have going for us at this point, is that we have 2 weeks to get read for the game.

DugtheDoog

MikeDamone said:

You mean like at cal in 2012? <-------faggoty wink. </p>

You mean like the Oregon State game?

MikeDamone

Tequilla said:

I'm optimistic with the growth we're seeing in the defense ...

The offense??? I have absolutely no clue what we're going to see.

Until we can get an actual read on what kind of consistent offense we're going to have, we've got problems that we hope that the defense and special teams can bail us out on.

After 5 games, we know. That's over 1/3 of the season. We have an actual read.

haie

uzi said:

Even if our D stops Cal... can our O score?

Cal gave up 36 points in the 4th quarter to an offense that lost everything from last year (Carey), and then nearly got embarrassed at home to Colorado, who is still fucking Colorado.

Sarkingham

uzi said:

Even if our D stops Cal... can our O score?

The best thing we have going for us at this point, is that we have 2 weeks to get read for the game.

If UW's offense can't score against Cal's "defense" then Peterman, his staff, and the team should have to walk back from Berkley.

TierbsHsotBoobs

MikeDamone said:

Tequilla said:

I'm optimistic with the growth we're seeing in the defense ...

The offense??? I have absolutely no clue what we're going to see.

Until we can get an actual read on what kind of consistent offense we're going to have, we've got problems that we hope that the defense and special teams can bail us out on.

After 5 games, we know. That's over 1/3 of the season. We have an actual read.

Hi. The season is only 1/9th complete.