Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Positives
Comments
-
USC 13, at Stanford 10.allpurpleallgold said:
LIPO.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford isn't the second best team in the league.allpurpleallgold said:
Here's the thing I don't get, we were playing Stanford. I'm not into moral victories. But this "depressingly bad" shit doesn't make any sense. That's a good team. Losing to the second best team in the league by 7 is not enough to freak out over.PurpleJ said:Good news: We still play in the Pac-12
Bad news: We lost and looked depressingly bad in the 2nd half (adjustments?)
Hope this helps.
-
USC 0 at BC 1,000,000,000TierbsHsotBoobs said:
USC 13, at Stanford 10.allpurpleallgold said:
LIPO.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford isn't the second best team in the league.allpurpleallgold said:
Here's the thing I don't get, we were playing Stanford. I'm not into moral victories. But this "depressingly bad" shit doesn't make any sense. That's a good team. Losing to the second best team in the league by 7 is not enough to freak out over.PurpleJ said:Good news: We still play in the Pac-12
Bad news: We lost and looked depressingly bad in the 2nd half (adjustments?)
Hope this helps. -
So BC 1,000,000,000 at Stanford -3allpurpleallgold said:
USC 0 at BC 1,000,000,000TierbsHsotBoobs said:
USC 13, at Stanford 10.allpurpleallgold said:
LIPO.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Stanford isn't the second best team in the league.allpurpleallgold said:
Here's the thing I don't get, we were playing Stanford. I'm not into moral victories. But this "depressingly bad" shit doesn't make any sense. That's a good team. Losing to the second best team in the league by 7 is not enough to freak out over.PurpleJ said:Good news: We still play in the Pac-12
Bad news: We lost and looked depressingly bad in the 2nd half (adjustments?)
Hope this helps. -
Last year Stanford beat them both. None of them are last year's team bu its awfully warm for November



