It's Sad to see how far Dawgman.com Has Fallen
Comments
-
Fuck you're an idiot.PurpleJ said:Well... It appears that we are getting somewhere here.
For a bored that doesn't take the internetz seriously, I sure see a lot of serious responses to my pressing. We all like to act like we don't really give a shit, but I am sure most of us do. Grow the hell up and learn the difference between real life and the internet, huh? I don't see much of a difference. Those two things are a reflection of the other. Glad I got your attention, though.
The point I was making, in my usual fucktarded way of getting it across, was that I see a lot of similarities between dm and HH. It's inevitable. But I will ask you this: What is our goal? Are we here to be a funnier version of doogman? Is surpassing doogman the measuring stick of our success? Or is doogman a stepping stone to something far greater? I may not take myself very seriously, but I do take this site seriously and I want it to be great. If not, why bother?
Back to monroe's banning... I saw the message DJ sent and I didn't like it one bit. I saw a smug prideful response from DJ, and it reminded me of a certain vertically-challanged someone. So I spoke up. Fuck. That. Sure I could have been a bit more direct in my approach to calling DJ out, but as always, I needed to elicit an honest response. It seems I succeeded in that. I needed to get in your head and figure out what's there. Call it psychology... or something.
When I ran the dawgbored I never banned anyone, and maybe that is a naive approach to moderation. That's why I'm glad I don't have that responsibility anymore. But if there is one thing I believe in, it's second chances. If someone (Hi Harv!) is here to purposely undermine the site, then by all means, ban that fuck. But... If someone makes a mistake, then don't be afraid to give them another shot.
So uhh...I like boobies and shit, and commas,,,,,. Hardy har har. Pick'em is broken. I got a plan to fix it. We'll throw out everything up to and including this week. Call it a scrimmage. I'll do my best to make it up to the taco tiki and not puke all over the piñata.
Go fuck yourselves!!!!1 -
-
I know. We all are.MikeDamone said:
Fuck you're an idiot.PurpleJ said:Well... It appears that we are getting somewhere here.
For a bored that doesn't take the internetz seriously, I sure see a lot of serious responses to my pressing. We all like to act like we don't really give a shit, but I am sure most of us do. Grow the hell up and learn the difference between real life and the internet, huh? I don't see much of a difference. Those two things are a reflection of the other. Glad I got your attention, though.
The point I was making, in my usual fucktarded way of getting it across, was that I see a lot of similarities between dm and HH. It's inevitable. But I will ask you this: What is our goal? Are we here to be a funnier version of doogman? Is surpassing doogman the measuring stick of our success? Or is doogman a stepping stone to something far greater? I may not take myself very seriously, but I do take this site seriously and I want it to be great. If not, why bother?
Back to monroe's banning... I saw the message DJ sent and I didn't like it one bit. I saw a smug prideful response from DJ, and it reminded me of a certain vertically-challanged someone. So I spoke up. Fuck. That. Sure I could have been a bit more direct in my approach to calling DJ out, but as always, I needed to elicit an honest response. It seems I succeeded in that. I needed to get in your head and figure out what's there. Call it psychology... or something.
When I ran the dawgbored I never banned anyone, and maybe that is a naive approach to moderation. That's why I'm glad I don't have that responsibility anymore. But if there is one thing I believe in, it's second chances. If someone (Hi Harv!) is here to purposely undermine the site, then by all means, ban that fuck. But... If someone makes a mistake, then don't be afraid to give them another shot.
So uhh...I like boobies and shit, and commas,,,,,. Hardy har har. Pick'em is broken. I got a plan to fix it. We'll throw out everything up to and including this week. Call it a scrimmage. I'll do my best to make it up to the taco tiki and not puke all over the piñata.
Go fuck yourselves!!!!1
And you're really "smart" for never falling for the ruse. -
Jesus. Worse than I thought.PurpleJ said:
I know. We all are.MikeDamone said:
Fuck you're an idiot.PurpleJ said:Well... It appears that we are getting somewhere here.
For a bored that doesn't take the internetz seriously, I sure see a lot of serious responses to my pressing. We all like to act like we don't really give a shit, but I am sure most of us do. Grow the hell up and learn the difference between real life and the internet, huh? I don't see much of a difference. Those two things are a reflection of the other. Glad I got your attention, though.
The point I was making, in my usual fucktarded way of getting it across, was that I see a lot of similarities between dm and HH. It's inevitable. But I will ask you this: What is our goal? Are we here to be a funnier version of doogman? Is surpassing doogman the measuring stick of our success? Or is doogman a stepping stone to something far greater? I may not take myself very seriously, but I do take this site seriously and I want it to be great. If not, why bother?
Back to monroe's banning... I saw the message DJ sent and I didn't like it one bit. I saw a smug prideful response from DJ, and it reminded me of a certain vertically-challanged someone. So I spoke up. Fuck. That. Sure I could have been a bit more direct in my approach to calling DJ out, but as always, I needed to elicit an honest response. It seems I succeeded in that. I needed to get in your head and figure out what's there. Call it psychology... or something.
When I ran the dawgbored I never banned anyone, and maybe that is a naive approach to moderation. That's why I'm glad I don't have that responsibility anymore. But if there is one thing I believe in, it's second chances. If someone (Hi Harv!) is here to purposely undermine the site, then by all means, ban that fuck. But... If someone makes a mistake, then don't be afraid to give them another shot.
So uhh...I like boobies and shit, and commas,,,,,. Hardy har har. Pick'em is broken. I got a plan to fix it. We'll throw out everything up to and including this week. Call it a scrimmage. I'll do my best to make it up to the taco tiki and not puke all over the piñata.
Go fuck yourselves!!!!1
And you're really "smart" for never falling for the ruse. -
MikeDamone said:
Jesus. Worse than I thought.PurpleJ said:
I know. We all are.MikeDamone said:
Fuck you're an idiot.PurpleJ said:Well... It appears that we are getting somewhere here.
For a bored that doesn't take the internetz seriously, I sure see a lot of serious responses to my pressing. We all like to act like we don't really give a shit, but I am sure most of us do. Grow the hell up and learn the difference between real life and the internet, huh? I don't see much of a difference. Those two things are a reflection of the other. Glad I got your attention, though.
The point I was making, in my usual fucktarded way of getting it across, was that I see a lot of similarities between dm and HH. It's inevitable. But I will ask you this: What is our goal? Are we here to be a funnier version of doogman? Is surpassing doogman the measuring stick of our success? Or is doogman a stepping stone to something far greater? I may not take myself very seriously, but I do take this site seriously and I want it to be great. If not, why bother?
Back to monroe's banning... I saw the message DJ sent and I didn't like it one bit. I saw a smug prideful response from DJ, and it reminded me of a certain vertically-challanged someone. So I spoke up. Fuck. That. Sure I could have been a bit more direct in my approach to calling DJ out, but as always, I needed to elicit an honest response. It seems I succeeded in that. I needed to get in your head and figure out what's there. Call it psychology... or something.
When I ran the dawgbored I never banned anyone, and maybe that is a naive approach to moderation. That's why I'm glad I don't have that responsibility anymore. But if there is one thing I believe in, it's second chances. If someone (Hi Harv!) is here to purposely undermine the site, then by all means, ban that fuck. But... If someone makes a mistake, then don't be afraid to give them another shot.
So uhh...I like boobies and shit, and commas,,,,,. Hardy har har. Pick'em is broken. I got a plan to fix it. We'll throw out everything up to and including this week. Call it a scrimmage. I'll do my best to make it up to the taco tiki and not puke all over the piñata.
Go fuck yourselves!!!!1
And you're really "smart" for never falling for the ruse.
-
One wonders if it would have been as highly acclaimed had Tolstoy used the original title.allpurpleallgold said:
The original title was actualy "War...what is it good for?".DerekJohnson said:It was a War and Peace sized novel with More_Cock.
-
Swaye said:
Did this thread just become a sort of fucked up HH kumbaya session? If so, I am totally in.
-
Includes the LSU/Bammer rematch, the LSU two loss team, easy schedules, and media propagandaRaceBannon said:Seven titles in eight years is one giant fucking fact.
-
Seven times an SEC team has faced a non SEC team in the championship game, and six times they have won it. Bitch all you want about subjective shit like scheduling and propaganda, but there's no arguing they have objectively gotten the job done when they've been there. Objective facts > subjective opinions.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Includes the LSU/Bammer rematch, the LSU two loss team, easy schedules, and media propagandaRaceBannon said:Seven titles in eight years is one giant fucking fact.
-
TIL PL_SS is actually paralyzed.
Or I'm being whooshed? Sigh.
