Old fuck couldn't take the heat. Got all pissed off when a thread he posted in was deleted and went full sandy vag. The deletion had nothing to do with him. He was always on the sandy vag edge. Now he's back playing in the shallow end of the pool with the retards. He was almost as economically illiterate as OBK.
didn't he try and pass himself off as some sort of successful bidnessman back in the unleashed days?
Engineer by trade/training. I have a great memory for shit that has nothing to do with me. Not exactly sure what he did for a living, but I'd bet he hasn't been doing it for a couple of decades given the advanced state of senility.
Fucking this. Asshole probably developed some rocket guidance weapon system in the 60's, and did fuckall the rest of his life after that. Except get old, faggoty and senile. The world would be a better place if he fell off a bridge into a lake of fire.
wow. forgot how ghey soft-rock/pop fags were back then. two or three of them actually, you can see it, used a fucking curling iron on their fucking bangs.
odds of at least three of those fuckers not taking it in the ass: less than zero.
wow. forgot how ghey soft-rock/pop fags were back then. two or three of them actually, you can see it, used a fucking curling iron on their fucking bangs.
odds of at least three of those fuckers not taking it in the ass: less than zero.
IDGAF if they were using curling irons, "Lady" is an all-timer. Shit is choice.
My apologies for using the title of a great S&G song to lead into a not-so-great football discussion about whether or not the new Husky Stadium is as loud as the old. IT IS NOT as I believe most who have attended games in our newly renovated football facility both last season and so far in 2014 will attest. Everybody I know who have attended live games agree that the new Husky Stadium is a remarkably beautiful place for football inside and out, but the deafening loudness we once enjoyed and were proud of is gone.
It could be that the 3-0 Huskies are not yet as exciting to us as we need to begin making that old-time noise again, but I think that's not the case. I was at the Husky-Illini game last Saturday and the place and home crowd were really rockin for at least the first 20 or so minutes, however the old loudness factor wasn't there. For those who doubt this, there are no more exciting and crowd-noise inducing plays in football than the 75 yard TD bomb from Miles to Ross, the pick-six by Shaq, and Shaq's fumble scoop and long TD run. The only thing noticeably missing was that old familiar Husky Stadium loudness we once knew so well.
Why is the new Husky Stadium not as loud and how could this have happened? First of all, remember from high school physics that noise is an energy similar to heat and once released into space, it must follow the path of least resistance until it dissipates, sometimes an infinite distance away when there's no resistance at all. Space dividing structures such as walls and roofs around and above stadium grandstands will block and redirect sound waves produced by crowd noise back to it's source as well as to the playing field to augment that sound energy that goes there un-impinged.
So, why are the acoustics in the new Husky Stadium different from the old? I believe there are three basic reasons, all incorporated by design in the renovation: 1) the all new south grandstand configuration; 2)the student body relocation to west end; and 3) the large open concourse passageways at south, north, and west lower horseshoe level.
My reserved seats are high in section 104 in the new south-side grandstands at between the 25-30 yard-lines. We are under cover, but whereas there was the large upper-deck close above us in the old stadium, we now have only a cantilever roof above us and it is way way up there. The entire lower 100 level horseshoe is the same all the way around with virtually no roof above the north side or the west end. This facilitates a lot more open space to allow escape of sound waves to the moon or a cloudy overcast. The 100 level horseshoe is now not much different acoustically than an open stadium without roofs.
The 200 and 300 levels in both the south and north grandstands are covered and at least the north upper deck is, of course unchanged. But the all new upper decks on the south side, consisting of 200 and 300 levels with luxury suits and club boxes in between is a completely new configuration, all covered by a shorter cantilever roof and appear to be much more exposed to open space and less sound energy retention for redirection down to the playing field. Also, between the two (lower and upper) sections of 300 level grandstands, there appears to be significant open space the entire length of the upper deck between the end-zones through which sound energy can escape to somewhere out above the south parking lots.
The all new west end grandstands are now mostly designated for UW students at least in the 100 level and from where I sit in section 104, most of the crowd noise coming from the student body is not nearly as loud or even noticeable compared to what it was before the renovation. One reason for this at the Illini game may have been due to UW students not yet on campus to begin classes. However a second reason must be the open concourse that runs the entire length behind the student section and is virtually open for sound energy escape out into the concourse and through a very large entrance opening onto Montlake Blvd.
Finally, there are open concourses behind the three Heritage Tyee sections in both the south and north lower (100) level grandstands. Although some may not expect Heritage Tyees to make a lot of noise, the fact is they do. Remembering that sound waves will follow the path of least resistance, a not insignificant amount of sound energy must escape through these large openings behind student and Heritage Tyee sections to rattle around and travel the entire length of the lower level concourse eventually being absorbed and attenuated to little more than the Sound of Silence.
Was renovated Husky Stadium purposely designed to be not as loud as the old stadium was? I believe from just the changes I can see that it was. I'm not an acoustics engineer, but I have been involved with OSHA violating noise and sound attenuating problems in working spaces and I believe any designer might incorporate those changes if one of the criteria for the renovation was to make the new Husky Stadium not as loud as it used to be. As to why, I can only guess that the UW was tired of hearing from our rivals about how un-sportsman like Husky Football had become in exposing our opponents to such a loud venue. After all, the stadium renovation eliminated the common tunnel leading to the field from both Husky and visitor locker-rooms which over the years was much reviled by our rivals. Why shouldn't UW become the Martha Stewart of collegiate football? We've already done the jail time. Last edited Today 12:29 PM by Tailgater
My apologies for using the title of a great S&G song to lead into a not-so-great football discussion about whether or not the new Husky Stadium is as loud as the old. IT IS NOT as I believe most who have attended games in our newly renovated football facility both last season and so far in 2014 will attest. Everybody I know who have attended live games agree that the new Husky Stadium is a remarkably beautiful place for football inside and out, but the deafening loudness we once enjoyed and were proud of is gone.
It could be that the 3-0 Huskies are not yet as exciting to us as we need to begin making that old-time noise again, but I think that's not the case. I was at the Husky-Illini game last Saturday and the place and home crowd were really rockin for at least the first 20 or so minutes, however the old loudness factor wasn't there. For those who doubt this, there are no more exciting and crowd-noise inducing plays in football than the 75 yard TD bomb from Miles to Ross, the pick-six by Shaq, and Shaq's fumble scoop and long TD run. The only thing noticeably missing was that old familiar Husky Stadium loudness we once knew so well.
Why is the new Husky Stadium not as loud and how could this have happened? First of all, remember from high school physics that noise is an energy similar to heat and once released into space, it must follow the path of least resistance until it dissipates, sometimes an infinite distance away when there's no resistance at all. Space dividing structures such as walls and roofs around and above stadium grandstands will block and redirect sound waves produced by crowd noise back to it's source as well as to the playing field to augment that sound energy that goes there un-impinged.
So, why are the acoustics in the new Husky Stadium different from the old? I believe there are three basic reasons, all incorporated by design in the renovation: 1) the all new south grandstand configuration; 2)the student body relocation to west end; and 3) the large open concourse passageways at south, north, and west lower horseshoe level.
My reserved seats are high in section 104 in the new south-side grandstands at between the 25-30 yard-lines. We are under cover, but whereas there was the large upper-deck close above us in the old stadium, we now have only a cantilever roof above us and it is way way up there. The entire lower 100 level horseshoe is the same all the way around with virtually no roof above the north side or the west end. This facilitates a lot more open space to allow escape of sound waves to the moon or a cloudy overcast. The 100 level horseshoe is now not much different acoustically than an open stadium without roofs.
The 200 and 300 levels in both the south and north grandstands are covered and at least the north upper deck is, of course unchanged. But the all new upper decks on the south side, consisting of 200 and 300 levels with luxury suits and club boxes in between is a completely new configuration, all covered by a shorter cantilever roof and appear to be much more exposed to open space and less sound energy retention for redirection down to the playing field. Also, between the two (lower and upper) sections of 300 level grandstands, there appears to be significant open space the entire length of the upper deck between the end-zones through which sound energy can escape to somewhere out above the south parking lots.
The all new west end grandstands are now mostly designated for UW students at least in the 100 level and from where I sit in section 104, most of the crowd noise coming from the student body is not nearly as loud or even noticeable compared to what it was before the renovation. One reason for this at the Illini game may have been due to UW students not yet on campus to begin classes. However a second reason must be the open concourse that runs the entire length behind the student section and is virtually open for sound energy escape out into the concourse and through a very large entrance opening onto Montlake Blvd.
Finally, there are open concourses behind the three Heritage Tyee sections in both the south and north lower (100) level grandstands. Although some may not expect Heritage Tyees to make a lot of noise, the fact is they do. Remembering that sound waves will follow the path of least resistance, a not insignificant amount of sound energy must escape through these large openings behind student and Heritage Tyee sections to rattle around and travel the entire length of the lower level concourse eventually being absorbed and attenuated to little more than the Sound of Silence.
Was renovated Husky Stadium purposely designed to be not as loud as the old stadium was? I believe from just the changes I can see that it was. I'm not an acoustics engineer, but I have been involved with OSHA violating noise and sound attenuating problems in working spaces and I believe any designer might incorporate those changes if one of the criteria for the renovation was to make the new Husky Stadium not as loud as it used to be. As to why, I can only guess that the UW was tired of hearing from our rivals about how un-sportsman like Husky Football had become in exposing our opponents to such a loud venue. After all, the stadium renovation eliminated the common tunnel leading to the field from both Husky and visitor locker-rooms which over the years was much reviled by our rivals. Why shouldn't UW become the Martha Stewart of collegiate football? We've already done the jail time. Last edited Today 12:29 PM by Tailgater
But My apologies for using the title of a great S&G song to lead into a not-so-great football discussion about whether or not the new Husky Stadium is as loud as the old. IT IS NOT as I believe most who have attended games in our newly renovated football facility both last season and so far in 2014 will attest. Everybody I know who have attended live games agree that the new Husky Stadium is a remarkably beautiful place for football inside and out, but the deafening loudness we once enjoyed and were proud of is gone.
It could be that the 3-0 Huskies are not yet as exciting to us as we need to begin making that old-time noise again, but I think that's not the case. I was at the Husky-Illini game last Saturday and the place and home crowd were really rockin for at least the first 20 or so minutes, however the old loudness factor wasn't there. For those who doubt this, there are no more exciting and crowd-noise inducing plays in football than the 75 yard TD bomb from Miles to Ross, the pick-six by Shaq, and Shaq's fumble scoop and long TD run. The only thing noticeably missing was that old familiar Husky Stadium loudness we once knew so well.
Why is the new Husky Stadium not as loud and how could this have happened? First of all, remember from high school physics that noise is an energy similar to heat and once released into space, it must follow the path of least resistance until it dissipates, sometimes an infinite distance away when there's no resistance at all. Space dividing structures such as walls and roofs around and above stadium grandstands will block and redirect sound waves produced by crowd noise back to it's source as well as to the playing field to augment that sound energy that goes there un-impinged.
So, why are the acoustics in the new Husky Stadium different from the old? I believe there are three basic reasons, all incorporated by design in the renovation: 1) the all new south grandstand configuration; 2)the student body relocation to west end; and 3) the large open concourse passageways at south, north, and west lower horseshoe level.
My reserved seats are high in section 104 in the new south-side grandstands at between the 25-30 yard-lines. We are under cover, but whereas there was the large upper-deck close above us in the old stadium, we now have only a cantilever roof above us and it is way way up there. The entire lower 100 level horseshoe is the same all the way around with virtually no roof above the north side or the west end. This facilitates a lot more open space to allow escape of sound waves to the moon or a cloudy overcast. The 100 level horseshoe is now not much different acoustically than an open stadium without roofs.
The 200 and 300 levels in both the south and north grandstands are covered and at least the north upper deck is, of course unchanged. But the all new upper decks on the south side, consisting of 200 and 300 levels with luxury suits and club boxes in between is a completely new configuration, all covered by a shorter cantilever roof and appear to be much more exposed to open space and less sound energy retention for redirection down to the playing field. Also, between the two (lower and upper) sections of 300 level grandstands, there appears to be significant open space the entire length of the upper deck between the end-zones through which sound energy can escape to somewhere out above the south parking lots.
The all new west end grandstands are now mostly designated for UW students at least in the 100 level and from where I sit in section 104, most of the crowd noise coming from the student body is not nearly as loud or even noticeable compared to what it was before the renovation. One reason for this at the Illini game may have been due to UW students not yet on campus to begin classes. However a second reason must be the open concourse that runs the entire length behind the student section and is virtually open for sound energy escape out into the concourse and through a very large entrance opening onto Montlake Blvd.
Finally, there are open concourses behind the three Heritage Tyee sections in both the south and north lower (100) level grandstands. Although some may not expect Heritage Tyees to make a lot of noise, the fact is they do. Remembering that sound waves will follow the path of least resistance, a not insignificant amount of sound energy must escape through these large openings behind student and Heritage Tyee sections to rattle around and travel the entire length of the lower level concourse eventually being absorbed and attenuated to little more than the Sound of Silence.
Was renovated Husky Stadium purposely designed to be not as loud as the old stadium was? I believe from just the changes I can see that it was. I'm not an acoustics engineer, but I have been involved with OSHA violating noise and sound attenuating problems in working spaces and I believe any designer might incorporate those changes if one of the criteria for the renovation was to make the new Husky Stadium not as loud as it used to be. As to why, I can only guess that the UW was tired of hearing from our rivals about how un-sportsman like Husky Football had become in exposing our opponents to such a loud venue. After all, the stadium renovation eliminated the common tunnel leading to the field from both Husky and visitor locker-rooms which over the years was much reviled by our rivals. Why shouldn't UW become the Martha Stewart of collegiate football? We've already done the jail time. Last edited Today 12:29 PM by Tailgater
I like the new stadium, but the video ribbons trigger seizures and moving the classy, quiet students out from under the roofs was a stupid move. Even if it made economic sense. If they wanted to make the money back quicker and shit, they should have added to the capacity.
Comments
Thanks Dennis!!
if you weren't able to get a little stink finger in middle school while that song was playing, then I wouldn't have been able to help you.
That's why I wrote it: to help you.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=uBi61pgDUP8
odds of at least three of those fuckers not taking it in the ass: less than zero.
It could be that the 3-0 Huskies are not yet as exciting to us as we need to begin making that old-time noise again, but I think that's not the case. I was at the Husky-Illini game last Saturday and the place and home crowd were really rockin for at least the first 20 or so minutes, however the old loudness factor wasn't there. For those who doubt this, there are no more exciting and crowd-noise inducing plays in football than the 75 yard TD bomb from Miles to Ross, the pick-six by Shaq, and Shaq's fumble scoop and long TD run. The only thing noticeably missing was that old familiar Husky Stadium loudness we once knew so well.
Why is the new Husky Stadium not as loud and how could this have happened? First of all, remember from high school physics that noise is an energy similar to heat and once released into space, it must follow the path of least resistance until it dissipates, sometimes an infinite distance away when there's no resistance at all. Space dividing structures such as walls and roofs around and above stadium grandstands will block and redirect sound waves produced by crowd noise back to it's source as well as to the playing field to augment that sound energy that goes there un-impinged.
So, why are the acoustics in the new Husky Stadium different from the old? I believe there are three basic reasons, all incorporated by design in the renovation: 1) the all new south grandstand configuration; 2)the student body relocation to west end; and 3) the large open concourse passageways at south, north, and west lower horseshoe level.
My reserved seats are high in section 104 in the new south-side grandstands at between the 25-30 yard-lines. We are under cover, but whereas there was the large upper-deck close above us in the old stadium, we now have only a cantilever roof above us and it is way way up there. The entire lower 100 level horseshoe is the same all the way around with virtually no roof above the north side or the west end. This facilitates a lot more open space to allow escape of sound waves to the moon or a cloudy overcast. The 100 level horseshoe is now not much different acoustically than an open stadium without roofs.
The 200 and 300 levels in both the south and north grandstands are covered and at least the north upper deck is, of course unchanged. But the all new upper decks on the south side, consisting of 200 and 300 levels with luxury suits and club boxes in between is a completely new configuration, all covered by a shorter cantilever roof and appear to be much more exposed to open space and less sound energy retention for redirection down to the playing field. Also, between the two (lower and upper) sections of 300 level grandstands, there appears to be significant open space the entire length of the upper deck between the end-zones through which sound energy can escape to somewhere out above the south parking lots.
The all new west end grandstands are now mostly designated for UW students at least in the 100 level and from where I sit in section 104, most of the crowd noise coming from the student body is not nearly as loud or even noticeable compared to what it was before the renovation. One reason for this at the Illini game may have been due to UW students not yet on campus to begin classes. However a second reason must be the open concourse that runs the entire length behind the student section and is virtually open for sound energy escape out into the concourse and through a very large entrance opening onto Montlake Blvd.
Finally, there are open concourses behind the three Heritage Tyee sections in both the south and north lower (100) level grandstands. Although some may not expect Heritage Tyees to make a lot of noise, the fact is they do. Remembering that sound waves will follow the path of least resistance, a not insignificant amount of sound energy must escape through these large openings behind student and Heritage Tyee sections to rattle around and travel the entire length of the lower level concourse eventually being absorbed and attenuated to little more than the Sound of Silence.
Was renovated Husky Stadium purposely designed to be not as loud as the old stadium was? I believe from just the changes I can see that it was. I'm not an acoustics engineer, but I have been involved with OSHA violating noise and sound attenuating problems in working spaces and I believe any designer might incorporate those changes if one of the criteria for the renovation was to make the new Husky Stadium not as loud as it used to be. As to why, I can only guess that the UW was tired of hearing from our rivals about how un-sportsman like Husky Football had become in exposing our opponents to such a loud venue. After all, the stadium renovation eliminated the common tunnel leading to the field from both Husky and visitor locker-rooms which over the years was much reviled by our rivals. Why shouldn't UW become the Martha Stewart of collegiate football? We've already done the jail time.
Last edited Today 12:29 PM by Tailgater
Last edited Today 12:29 PM by Tailgater
Disagree
But
My apologies for using the title of a great S&G song to lead into a not-so-great football discussion about whether or not the new Husky Stadium is as loud as the old. IT IS NOT as I believe most who have attended games in our newly renovated football facility both last season and so far in 2014 will attest. Everybody I know who have attended live games agree that the new Husky Stadium is a remarkably beautiful place for football inside and out, but the deafening loudness we once enjoyed and were proud of is gone.
It could be that the 3-0 Huskies are not yet as exciting to us as we need to begin making that old-time noise again, but I think that's not the case. I was at the Husky-Illini game last Saturday and the place and home crowd were really rockin for at least the first 20 or so minutes, however the old loudness factor wasn't there. For those who doubt this, there are no more exciting and crowd-noise inducing plays in football than the 75 yard TD bomb from Miles to Ross, the pick-six by Shaq, and Shaq's fumble scoop and long TD run. The only thing noticeably missing was that old familiar Husky Stadium loudness we once knew so well.
Why is the new Husky Stadium not as loud and how could this have happened? First of all, remember from high school physics that noise is an energy similar to heat and once released into space, it must follow the path of least resistance until it dissipates, sometimes an infinite distance away when there's no resistance at all. Space dividing structures such as walls and roofs around and above stadium grandstands will block and redirect sound waves produced by crowd noise back to it's source as well as to the playing field to augment that sound energy that goes there un-impinged.
So, why are the acoustics in the new Husky Stadium different from the old? I believe there are three basic reasons, all incorporated by design in the renovation: 1) the all new south grandstand configuration; 2)the student body relocation to west end; and 3) the large open concourse passageways at south, north, and west lower horseshoe level.
My reserved seats are high in section 104 in the new south-side grandstands at between the 25-30 yard-lines. We are under cover, but whereas there was the large upper-deck close above us in the old stadium, we now have only a cantilever roof above us and it is way way up there. The entire lower 100 level horseshoe is the same all the way around with virtually no roof above the north side or the west end. This facilitates a lot more open space to allow escape of sound waves to the moon or a cloudy overcast. The 100 level horseshoe is now not much different acoustically than an open stadium without roofs.
The 200 and 300 levels in both the south and north grandstands are covered and at least the north upper deck is, of course unchanged. But the all new upper decks on the south side, consisting of 200 and 300 levels with luxury suits and club boxes in between is a completely new configuration, all covered by a shorter cantilever roof and appear to be much more exposed to open space and less sound energy retention for redirection down to the playing field. Also, between the two (lower and upper) sections of 300 level grandstands, there appears to be significant open space the entire length of the upper deck between the end-zones through which sound energy can escape to somewhere out above the south parking lots.
The all new west end grandstands are now mostly designated for UW students at least in the 100 level and from where I sit in section 104, most of the crowd noise coming from the student body is not nearly as loud or even noticeable compared to what it was before the renovation. One reason for this at the Illini game may have been due to UW students not yet on campus to begin classes. However a second reason must be the open concourse that runs the entire length behind the student section and is virtually open for sound energy escape out into the concourse and through a very large entrance opening onto Montlake Blvd.
Finally, there are open concourses behind the three Heritage Tyee sections in both the south and north lower (100) level grandstands. Although some may not expect Heritage Tyees to make a lot of noise, the fact is they do. Remembering that sound waves will follow the path of least resistance, a not insignificant amount of sound energy must escape through these large openings behind student and Heritage Tyee sections to rattle around and travel the entire length of the lower level concourse eventually being absorbed and attenuated to little more than the Sound of Silence.
Was renovated Husky Stadium purposely designed to be not as loud as the old stadium was? I believe from just the changes I can see that it was. I'm not an acoustics engineer, but I have been involved with OSHA violating noise and sound attenuating problems in working spaces and I believe any designer might incorporate those changes if one of the criteria for the renovation was to make the new Husky Stadium not as loud as it used to be. As to why, I can only guess that the UW was tired of hearing from our rivals about how un-sportsman like Husky Football had become in exposing our opponents to such a loud venue. After all, the stadium renovation eliminated the common tunnel leading to the field from both Husky and visitor locker-rooms which over the years was much reviled by our rivals. Why shouldn't UW become the Martha Stewart of collegiate football? We've already done the jail time.
Last edited Today 12:29 PM by Tailgater