Could Be Worth Pointing Out

HFNY

Besides my boner pointing out of my 5 inch inseam jhorts (easier for my ankle monitor) while in my parent's basement , it could be worth pointing out that Chris Petersen went an impressive 57-6 in conference at BSU but unfortunately, 5 of those 6 losses came with Kwiatkowski as his DC with the D giving up an average of 33.5 points in those conference losses.

A friend also worked out with a former BSU player* (played defense) earlier this year and that player couldn't say enough great things about Petersen but said that Kwiatkowski probably has been promoted beyond his capabilities and should have stayed as a DL coach since he was an exceptional DL coach.



















*if you want to know who the former player was, tough luck so fuck off.

TierbsHsotBoobs

Hi Kim!

MikeDamone

HFNY said:

Besides my boner pointing out of my 5 inch inseam jhorts (easier for my ankle monitor) while in my parent's basement , it could be worth pointing out that Chris Petersen went an impressive 57-6 in conference at BSU but unfortunately, 5 of those 6 losses came with Kwiatkowski as his DC with the D giving up an average of 33.5 points in those conference losses.

A friend also worked out with a former BSU player* (played defense) earlier this year and that player couldn't say enough great things about Petersen but said that Kwiatkowski probably has been promoted beyond his capabilities and should have stayed as a DL coach since he was an exceptional DL coach.


*if you want to know who the former player was, tough luck so fuck off.

The Marcus Peters Principle?

GrundleStiltzkin

Cool story, bro

HFNY

Haha, big difference is that I'm not trying to make money off sharing "what I'm hearing".

Tequilla

This may be true ...

However, if it is, I'd expect Petersen to make a change when it becomes obvious that it is needed.

HFNY

Yes, he still deserves the benefit of the doubt.

Tequilla said:

This may be true ...

However, if it is, I'd expect Petersen to make a change when it becomes obvious that it is needed.

greenblood

So..........you guys are not in favor of Holt 2.0?

HFNY

Holt was only nominally the DC under Defensive Guru Pete Carroll yet Sarkisian hired him anyway. Kwiatkowski has a lot to prove but he was actually the DC at BSU for 4 years (not just make-believe like Holt). HTH

Hippopeteamus

In fairness to Kwiatkowski, it is not like Wilcox's defenses simply shut down the WAC offenses. He gave up 30+ points 8 times to conference foes. This isn't to say he is not a better DC.

chuck

Hippopeteamus said:

In fairness to Kwiatkowski, it is not like Wilcox's defenses simply shut down the WAC offenses. He gave up 30+ points 8 times to conference foes. This isn't to say he is not a better DC.

Quit with the facts fucko. Nobody likes em.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

Tequilla said:

This may be true ...

However, if it is, I'd expect Petersen to make a change when it becomes obvious that it is needed.

1:28

If he's 94-12, he's not going to allow 15-12 over the next two yrs. because of a sive d.

HFNY

Good point.

Hippopeteamus said:

In fairness to Kwiatkowski, it is not like Wilcox's defenses simply shut down the WAC offenses. He gave up 30+ points 8 times to conference foes. This isn't to say he is not a better DC.

bananasnblondes

Did the former player say that Twatkowski took the fun out of football for him?