Spread for Illinois is 12

HFNY

But with Peters out, will it settle at 10?

I hope the D play-calling is less Vanilla and the secondary gets coached up or else Wes Lunt will torch us.

Homebrew_Dawg

No, I think Illinois can take a full 12 inches.

HFNY

But can Wes Lunt handle the Dangling Dick (or is that Kwiatkowski?)

Homebrew_Dawg said:

No, I think Illinois can take a full 12 inches.

PurpleReign

Just let me know when 5 reasons makes an appearance.

PurpleJ

Has Cyler punched the spread yet?

RoadDawg55

HFNY said:

But with Peters out, will it settle at 10?

I hope the D play-calling is less Vanilla and the secondary gets coached up or else Wes Lunt will torch us.

He will have his moments, but he's not mobile and they don't run the ball well. The pass rush will look much better against a slower QB and we will get a couple turnovers. Easy win.

Tequilla

We should have beat them by 20-24 last year if Sark and his squad didn't fuck around ... agree that it should be rather easy ...

I'd take the Dawgs and the Over once the line settles in at around 10.5

HFNY

I hope you're right. Maybe we'll see more Feeney and Littleton on the field and less of one (or both) of the Hudsons on passing downs.

RoadDawg55 said:

HFNY said:

But with Peters out, will it settle at 10?

I hope the D play-calling is less Vanilla and the secondary gets coached up or else Wes Lunt will torch us.

He will have his moments, but he's not mobile and they don't run the ball well. The pass rush will look much better against a slower QB and we will get a couple turnovers. Easy win.

AtomicDawg

WHere has the Jetson Package been on pass rushing downs. I always liked how sark called it that. It was good for recruiting and was fun to talk about on the message boards.

doogsinparadise

Think they're still giving points this week, Peterman doesn't have the team dialed in yet.