Biden has aggressive prostate cancer
Comments
-
Yeah it's radiation and chemotherapy... I may have it on my Pelvis... it came back positive on my pet scan... but there are possible other causes. So I have another one in 2 weeks to see what's going on.
-
he’s like 82. I think they’ll try to avoid chemo.
-
Probably.... they will also do hormone therapy as well... but that causes brain fog... could explain his issues already truthfully!
-
As protocol in Canada they ask men of his age, with this advanced a cancer, if they would like to be euthanized as a treatment option.
-
-
-
Something Doesn’t Add Up About Biden’s Cancer Announcement
On Sunday, news broke that former President Joe Biden was diagnosed with an aggressive form of prostate cancer, characterized by a Gleason score of 9 and metastasis to the bone. The announcement, made by Biden’s office, detailed that the diagnosis followed the discovery of a prostate nodule after worsening urinary symptoms a week prior. While the statement emphasized that the cancer is hormone-sensitive, offering hope for effective management, the timing and context of this revelation raise serious questions about transparency and political motivations.
The key question I have is this: Did Joe Biden’s inner circle know about this diagnosis last year?
Obviously, questions about Joe Biden’s physical and mental health have been raised for years. Let’s be honest here. Joe Biden had access to top-notch health care while in the Oval Office—with a personal physician, Kevin O’Connor, who, back in 2023, described him as a “healthy, vigorous 80-year-old male who is fit to successfully execute the duties of the presidency.” We all knew that assessment was garbage. Would the same doctor who claimed Joe Biden was “healthy” and “vigorous” also cover up a cancer diagnosis until after the presidential election?
Yeah, I think so.
I’m not saying that’s what happened, but you better believe that I think it’s possible that he did. In fact, a clip of Biden saying he “had cancer” back in 2022 has gone viral in the wake of the revelation.
“And guess what—the first frost, you know what was happening?" said Biden. "You'd have to put on your windshield wipers to get, literally, the oil slick off the window.,” he said during a speech about climate change in Somerset, Massachusetts. “That's why I, and so damn many other people I grew up with, have cancer. And why, for the longest time, Delaware had the highest cancer rate in the nation.”
A gaffe? A slip of the tongue? With the Bidens, anything is possible.
Okay, let’s state the obvious: I’m not a doctor. Heck, I don’t even play one on TV.
Okay, fine. I’ll get a doctor’s input.
Fox News Senior Medical Analyst Dr. Marc Siegel says the presence of symptoms and bone metastases in Joe Biden’s case strongly suggests the cancer had been growing undetected for quite some time. That’s not just concerning—it raises serious questions about how such an advanced stage of disease went unnoticed, especially for someone with constant access to top-tier medical care.
Siegel pointed out that Biden’s age—82—is a major risk factor, noting that more than 80 percent of men over 80 have some level of prostate cancer cells in their bodies. “This is one of the cancers doctors specifically monitor in older men,” Siegel explained.
Which begs the obvious question: Are we really supposed to believe that Biden, while in office, wasn’t being routinely screened for this? Come on. Not giving him a cognitive exam because they knew he’d flunk it is one thing; not screening him for something he was obviously at high risk for?
That just doesn’t pass the smell test.
-
86 motherfucker
-
There's a chance I'm being an insensitive asshole here, but something in the timing of this doesn't feel right.
Who knows what's coming down the pike in terms of indictments and Tapper's ridiculous new book. Would not surprise me that Biden gets knocked off and they attribute it to this "cancer" as somehow a cover or distraction.
There's a chance I'm way off but something doesn't seem right with this picture.
-
Everything Biden did needs to be overturned as there is no possible way to know who made these decisions.
