Reminder: Do not post other people's content
Comments
-
Welcome to Nazi Germany.
-
Do I get a shovel in this Gulag, or should I just use my hands?
-
In my own words
Sark is great Petersen isn't
Anonymous -
HuskyClaus reminds us to be careful what we wish for.
-
I
stalkpay it forward for blondes at Renton Highlands Starbucks - Kim -
Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
I
stalkpay it forward for blondes atRenton Highlands StarbucksSkippers - Kim -
Does this apply to fat chicks?
-
You down with OPC?
-
Does that include quoting Fatters?
-
If you're quoting a sentence or two, especially from a presser, that's fine. But no cutting and pasting of people's articles and such.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Does that include quoting Fatters?
-
He had a very good tutorial about how to get mustard stains out of T-shirts the other day...can I share that???
-
Will we get a warning..?DerekJohnson said:
If you're quoting a sentence or two, especially from a presser, that's fine. But no cutting and pasting of people's articles and such.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Does that include quoting Fatters?
-
you'll just be gone.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Will we get a warning..?DerekJohnson said:
If you're quoting a sentence or two, especially from a presser, that's fine. But no cutting and pasting of people's articles and such.puppylove_sugarsteel said:Does that include quoting Fatters?
-
this does not apply to what Kim is hearing
-
Reminder: do not post other peoples content. Be it Dawgman or anybody else. I've had to delete 3 threads since yesterday with people posting other people's content. If you wish to address something, summarize it in your own words.DerekJohnson said:Be it Dawgman or anybody else. I've had to delete 3 threads since yesterday with people posting other people's content. If you wish to address something, summarize it in your own words.
-
It seems like you can draw content under fair use laws. I mean, if you copy a couple of sentences from dawgman and then comment upon them that is perfectly fine. The burden of proof would be on dawgman. He could try it, but fair use is important...
-
oh, I see that was your comment! never mind...
-
like I just said, okay to quote a sentence or two, but not to cut and paste.ApostleofGrief said:It seems like you can draw content under fair use laws. I mean, if you copy a couple of sentences from dawgman and then comment upon them that is perfectly fine. The burden of proof would be on dawgman. He could try it, but fair use is important...
-
Well aren't public statements just that; public? Isn't content public unless one is using that content for financial gain or passing off as ones' own content? I dont see the problem, could you please explain Derek instead of just saying "dont do it ?
I really dont care to paste that shit, I just want to know the issues of legality as it pertains to a fucking hobby bored. Anybody? Derek? I completely respect what youre asking, just curious dude. -
If it's content that's poasted (hardy har har) on a premium bored or subscriber-only portion, it is not public content.
-
I hope you dont call yourself a Christian with a comment like that
-
read up on fair use. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_usepuppylove_sugarsteel said:Well aren't public statements just that; public? Isn't content public unless one is using that content for financial gain or passing off as ones' own content? I dont see the problem, could you please explain Derek instead of just saying "dont do it ?
I really dont care to paste that shit, I just want to know the issues of legality as it pertains to a fucking hobby bored. Anybody? Derek? I completely respect what youre asking, just curious dude. -
Pubic content is cool, right?
More Jennifer Lawrence shots, less what I'm hearing shit. -
How hard is this to understand? Just stop plagiarism people's shit, fuckos!
-
So you're saying we can copy/paste content as long as we treat it as educational material and make sure it's not for profit?ApostleofGrief said:
read up on fair use. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_usepuppylove_sugarsteel said:Well aren't public statements just that; public? Isn't content public unless one is using that content for financial gain or passing off as ones' own content? I dont see the problem, could you please explain Derek instead of just saying "dont do it ?
I really dont care to paste that shit, I just want to know the issues of legality as it pertains to a fucking hobby bored. Anybody? Derek? I completely respect what youre asking, just curious dude. -
It also says it's ok as long as you're using it for parody, which definitely happens here. Poast those fucking screenshots!!!!!!!!!!11!!!!!one!!!!eleven!!!!!!!!whatshouldicareabout said:
So you're saying we can copy/paste content as long as we treat it as educational material and make sure it's not for profit?ApostleofGrief said:
read up on fair use. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_usepuppylove_sugarsteel said:Well aren't public statements just that; public? Isn't content public unless one is using that content for financial gain or passing off as ones' own content? I dont see the problem, could you please explain Derek instead of just saying "dont do it ?
I really dont care to paste that shit, I just want to know the issues of legality as it pertains to a fucking hobby bored. Anybody? Derek? I completely respect what youre asking, just curious dude. -
The only premium content that should be posted here is Kate Upton and Jennifer Lawrence's Premium Content.DerekJohnson said:Be it Dawgman or anybody else. I've had to delete 3 threads since yesterday with people posting other people's content. If you wish to address something, summarize it in your own words.
-
Just don't cut/paste whole articles. You can copy a few sentences so long as you make comments or criticisms on it. The idea behind fair use is to further society by making it legal to criticize the works of others. If scientists could not report the findings of others they could not disprove anything, and no progress would happen. Just because somebody has paywalled or copyright all over their material, IT IS NO FUCKING BLOCK TO FAIR USE. They can say, "Copyright xxxx, all rights reserved, do not reproduce etc etc etc" Fuck that shit. You can STILL use parts of it under the fair use clause. Learn it, know it, live it...whatshouldicareabout said:
So you're saying we can copy/paste content as long as we treat it as educational material and make sure it's not for profit?ApostleofGrief said:
read up on fair use. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_usepuppylove_sugarsteel said:Well aren't public statements just that; public? Isn't content public unless one is using that content for financial gain or passing off as ones' own content? I dont see the problem, could you please explain Derek instead of just saying "dont do it ?
I really dont care to paste that shit, I just want to know the issues of legality as it pertains to a fucking hobby bored. Anybody? Derek? I completely respect what youre asking, just curious dude. -
-
Message bored poasts aren't considered articles or premium content are they?
