Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

The complicit media and the insanity defense

BendintheriverBendintheriver Member Posts: 6,023 Standard Supporter

After the debate it became clear that the press had not done any homework at all. They were simply a rubber stamp for Headboard, further cementing their absolute dereliction of journalistic duty and their abject dishonesty. They all lied and said that Trump lied when he accused Headboard of supporting tax payer funded sex change operations for criminals and illegals in prison. Problem was, Trump told the truth and the press did their job and tried to protect Headboard.

This article perfectly articulates where the problem lies. If the rat candidates were honest about their beliefs, they would never get elected. So they lie and the msm protects them. It is literally just like any communist, socialist or fascist government and how they control the media.

The Democrats’ Insanity Defense - Tablet Magazine

In the September debate between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, Trump said something so ludicrous that many viewers must have dismissed it out of hand. “She did things that nobody would ever think of,” Trump said, while rattling off a list of some of the vice president’s most radical past positions. “Now she wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in prison.”

The idea that the vice president “wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in prison” seemed so patently absurd that The New Yorker’s Susan Glasser cited it in a column posted the next morning as an example of Trump’s lunacy: “What the hell was he talking about?” Glasser wrote of the trans operation lines. “No one knows, which was, of course, exactly Harris’ point.”

That reaction was understandable—the idea of the operations was, as Trump himself said, a “thing nobody would ever think of.” The problem was that it is true. As CNN had reported that week, Harris, when running for the Democratic nomination in 2019, had written in an ACLU questionnaire that she supported publicly funded “gender-affirming care,” including transition surgeries, for federal prison inmates and detained illegal immigrants. Follow-up reporting from The Washington Free Beacon revealed that while serving as California attorney general, Harris had in fact implemented a statewide policy of taxpayer funding for prisoners’ sex changes, born out of a settlement in which she agreed to pay for the transition of a man convicted of kidnapping a father of three and then murdering him as he begged for his life. Harris later bragged, on camera, about this policy as evidence of her commitment to the progressive “movement”—in a clip that has since become a staple of Trump campaign ads.

Comments

Sign In or Register to comment.