Trump Guilty - 34 counts in sham trial
Comments
-
-
-
Correction, THE PEOPLE THAT DON'T SUCK OFF RAPISTS and (Horrifically botched) insurrection leaders. But your poont stands.
-
The all caps makes you sound like such a reasonable and thoughtful person.
-
Ewa? Electing Women Alliance? would make sense. Bearslose in that club?
-
Bill Clinton and his 30-some-odd flights in the Lolita Express belly laughed on the tarmac over this post.
.
-
Cockroaches
-
What insurrection?
What rape? -
January 6th. "We want an honest election."
Summer of Love. "We want to end the Constitution and establish a commie government."
-
Falsifying business records to cover up another crime has been a low-level felony in NY since at least 1986. It has been prosecuted as a felony frequently since then. The TugCon girls apparently dislike NY law, but because of their enormous respect for federalism and the notion that states are "laboratories of democracy", they are quietly respecting NY's sovereign right to enact such laws and to prosecute their violation.
NAH, just kidding! These gals are squealing like stuck pigs!
-
What crime was covered up? Don't hurt yourself.
-
Another Leftist shows up to show his retardation.
Biden’s daughter wrote Daddy Joe molested her. Her own written words. You support a pedophile. Are you a pedophile, too?
-
Never been prosecuted before. Judge, in violation of judicial rules, donated to an anti-Trump organization.
You’re a worthless piece of shit, always have been, but I kind of feel sorry for your children to have such an extremist as a dad. Any abortion discussions around the family dinner table lately, Bozo?
-
-
Bragg is using a federal law to make the jump and the feds refused to prosecute any of it. Bragg is not a fed. He doesn't try fed crimes. But then you're the lawyer! All fake all the tim. Demonrats that is.
-
You're free to show us why NY cannot prosecute because the cover up involved federal crimes. I await your undoubtedly fascinating legal analysis.
-
The feds said there were NO CRIMES. HTH
-
H trying to convince himself this is anything other than political lawfare is both pathetic and hilarious.
You’re wrong, dipshit. Open season now on you fuckers for conservative DAs.
-
H can't read
-
-
Which federal crime was Trump convicted of that had to be covered up by payment classification?
Fucking retard here.
-
According to legal genius @HHusky, Trump committed a state crime by covering up a federal crime that the DOJ never even prosecuted Trump for, let alone get a conviction.
You’re not an attorney, poseur.
-
Feel free to link to "the feds [saying] there were no crimes".
-
When Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg first announced hush money charges against former President Donald Trump in March 2023, commentators were quick to cast doubt on the strength of the case. Among the criticisms leveled against Bragg from both right and left was that the district attorney’s office had simply resurrected a case already considered and abandoned by federal prosecutors in the Southern District of New York (SDNY), who had already investigated Trump and chosen not to bring charges against him under federal campaign finance law for the same scheme. “If anyone should have brought this case,” wrote law professor Jed Shugerman in the New York Times, it was the Justice Department. In the Washington Post, Ruth Marcus questioned whether Bragg could “transmogrify this conduct into a state crime” from its federal roots. On the right, Andrew McCarthy suggested in National Review that Bragg was “politically engineering” federal law “into a new election law of his very own.”
-
So you meant the Feds didn't prosecute, which is a lot different than saying there were no crimes.
-
Now do PIPS and the dementia patient. Or not. No testimony allowed on why the federal election law was not violated. Why was that? Stormy was allowed to testify on lots of things that weren't part of any of Trump's alleged crimes. No testimony on the crux of Trump's case. No reasonable doubt? Geezus.
-
I'm not the one claiming the Feds declared anyone innocent, Gasbag.
-
Ah, but the feds did say they didn't have a case and no testimony was allowed. Unlike with PIPS and the dementia patient they did have a case but refused to prosecute because PIPS meant well and the dementia patient was a dementia patient. You suck at this.
-
Butterball killed the case at the federal level.
We do agree the federal crimes should have been prosecuted by the Feds.
But you gals need to explain why NY can't prosecute under their state law for covering up a federal crime.
-
What federal crime was Trump convicted?
