DM to the Biden Bros
Comments
-
Kinda funny,
"The views expressed in American Meteorological Society Policy Program memos are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Meteorological Society, its members, or sponsors."
Anyway, good, I'm glad, we have one source, finally, AMS. Any others?
-
How about the University of East Anglia where Michael Mann made up his hockey stick with fake temperature data and then he and his university refused access to raw data and then the damning emails. The US has been altering historical temperature data decreasing historical high temperatures and increasing more modern temperatures. Toss in the urban heat island impact where most of the claimed warming is occurring at night as cement, black top and large building release heat stored during the day. The tell is our self-proclaimed scientist has offered no solution other than the failing solution of government fascism of mandated expensive dirty non-reliable renewable solar and wind while giving the chicoms a pass. Then all that hard science that was telling us that snowfall would be a thing of the past, no glaciers in the Alps, no ice caps, a flooded New York City all to have occurred a decade/decades ago.
-
-
I was right
-
Did you read the OP? This isn't a climate change thread but a thread to establish legitimate sources. I take it materials from Google scholar are considered legitimate as well then?
Good, I hope we can build on this list. Where else is acceptable for news and information?
-
Also, since you clearly want to make me repeat my sources that I've already posted, here's this recent landmark study for you on economic impact.
-
I posted a video of an actual scientist - with more scientific brain power in his pinky toe than you could wish for - explain how the real science was manipulated (out-right fabrication) for political gain. That man is not lying. And all you could focus on is the platform it came from, no substance. I've watched the same scientist explain the substance of the real graph using extensive ice sheet core sampling. Real, actual science.
You claim pseudoscience with no source, not alternate evidence, nothing. At this point calling someone a pseudoscientist is as worthless as calling someone a racist or white supremacist. It means nothing anymore due to overuse. By you, the HARD Left.
.
Moreover, the disagreements I can remember with my conservative/maga brethren.
@UW_Doog_Bot China, Peter Zeihan
@creepycoug Abortion, Israel/Palestine
@WestlinnDuck Israel/Palestine
@RaceBannon Israel/Palestine
@PostGameOrangeSlices Ukraine
@DerekJohnson Video Sources
Contrary to popular HARD left opinion, conversation and real debate happen around here.
.
-
Nature huh.
-
Oh yeah, I forgot that you asked us for where we get all our information out of the blue. That was weird.
-
If you can't handle up ups and downs of thread-jacking, maybe doogman is more your speed?
.
