Carbon Emissions since 2000
Comments
-
"I'm not an economist. I could get into those weeds but I don't really care to do that here."
Big Ern with an all timer. Ranks right up there with the dazzler's, "One of the most effective vaccines ever" or "I voted for [barry] the more fiscally responsible alternative". In a world of limited resources every dollar spent is a dollar not spent on something else. Ignoring a cost-benefit analysis is like ignoring gravity. The average US family is spending thousands of dollars on the green gai anti-science sh*t. And the result is? Just more chicken little warnings about how we have to spend more to save the planet. Nuclear would be a safe economic bet. So would LNG. Neither of these are on Big Ern's list of voting priorities because any cost-benefit analysis is "weeds". Just feel good virtue signaling that has no virtue. After the US and the world's insane non-scientific response to a Chicom virus we helped pay for you would think that any intelligent person might take a step back and reexamine who is behind the global warming hoax and why? But leftards don't do science or economics.
-
The coaches had a good plan but the players didn't execute
-
That is a multi-trillion dollar industry which the government tit sucker Ern MUST have in place to steal our tax dollars so his govt man boobs don't dry up and his pension goes tits up. Big boy is delusional if his libtarded brain believes 99.9% of scientists agree with his RAT cult. He has to believe this because it's his religion and faith. Of course anyone whose direct or indirect financial welfare is dependant upon the government is going to pray at the alter of tyranny. Do you think these serious scientists are ever going to bite ththe hand that feeds them? Fuck no big boy ain't taking his fat ass lips off those man boobs anytime soon.
-
Taking the ball and going home potd.
I steel manned your position and am saying, "OK, climate change IS real. Now what?"
And your response is debate is impossible.
Sums up the left on this issue.
-
If and when are already here. It's called hydrogen and yes it's being killed for the aforementioned points you made.
-
Why would someone relireliant on big government spending and his retirement take a step back? He' a braindead idiot who thinks his worthless degrees make him somebody speecial.
-
Your boy says it was 5 degrees warmer when Jesus walked the earth, what can I expect?
Y'all shifted the goalposts to an political economic circlejerk. That's not why I posted here. Notice I haven't made one political statement in this whole thread. This is apolitical. I keep saying it and it stays true. I'm saying climate change and its impact is real and the denying that truth shows a willful ignorance. You're attacking something I've never even made an opinion on besides acknowledging a big picture need. I don't need to back up the existence of climate change with talk of Jay Inslee. That's a separate thing that y'all can chum about.
-
So your original position isn't up for debate and anyone arguing otherwise can't be engaged with.
But going into the implementation of your position is "too far into the weeds" and "shifting the goalposts".
Got it.
-
So typical of a leftard. Have very strong intense feelings about a subject but have no actual factual knowledge about it and are incapable of articulating an actual agenda to accomplish a solution. Take DEI, reparations and affirmative action supporters and then ask them to define "black". I've asked that question for decades with no response. Same with how much should we spend and what will it accomplish on global warming.
-
Copy. You were born without common sense. It's a super power these days. I pity the younger generations. Communism has its claws in many and they don't even know it. Don't you have a Hamas really to attend? Pullman has one going on.
