Famous rapist
Comments
-
https://x.com/JohnLeFevre/status/1751096800935551020?s=20
I thought everyone knew the E. Jean Carroll vs Trump case was bogus, until I heard my mother's (late 60s Republican) uninformed take on the verdict after watching ABC Nightly News.
It's hard to find on Google, so here's what you need to know about E. Jean Carroll, most of which was deemed "inadmissible" by the judge:
- She couldn't recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened
- She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality
- The dress she claims to have been wearing didn't exist at the time
- Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible
- Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman
- Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed
- Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her "favorite shows")
- Trump's Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows
- She has a history of falsely accusing men of r*pe, including Les Moonves
- She told Anderson Cooper, "most people think of r*pe as being sexy. Think of the fantasies."
- She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat VaginaThe billionaire sponsor of all this Jean Carrol bullshit is also the huge sponsor behind Nikki Hayley who's running against Trump. Think about that a minute.
-
Dems aren't ruthless. They are total fucking pussies.
That's why they only attack in mobs and have to kick someone off the ballot because they can't win a fair fight.
-
Trump’s character is the real victim here.
That’s a new one. I’ll add it to my Bingo card. -
Fuck off.
-
You've played genetic bingo and lost!
-
Imagine if you knew you didn't do something, but then the court decided you did it anyway. Then, in a subsequent case, the judge says you can't say you didn't do it.
The judge is basically saying "please lie to the court during this case, please".
-
lol you do that, shitbird.
-
That would be pretty outrageous.
When did that happen?
-
Imagine you’re Oregon, and you know you didn’t lose the championship game but the scoreboard shows you did . . .
-
Only a shitty attorney would equate a civil trial to a criminal trial. But even a shitty attorney would realize the game was rigged!
-
Undisclosed Conflict of interest between Judge and EJean Carrolls attorney just blew the case.
Judge was mentor for Carrolls attorney and worked at same firm previously.
Ethics violation
Carroll will get nothing
-
Yeah, this sounds likely.
-
Perfectly normal I say!
-
Another "ethics violation"?
sounds bad
-
-
-
This is thick with irony.
Daddy couldn't tell them apart.
-
You Democrats have no ethics, of course it’s OK with you.
I really like your criticism of all the minorities who are “losers” because they are struggling to make ends meet. It really shines a light on what a piece of shit you are, Rachel.
-
Thanks legal scholar, tell us more about the appeals process.
-
It was a low-quality still-frame photo. These can be incredibly misleading and difficult to decipher. Have you ever noticed how people look different in every photo?
As such, the judge should have instructed the jury to disregardTrump's comments on this. In no way was this damning against him.
Not only that, but even if Trump thought she looked similar to his wife, that does not contradict Trump's statement that Carol was "not her type", at all.
-
Marla is still hot as ballz
IKW. Fuck vanilla -
Fender thinks a three minute sexual assault is a love affair.
-
The point you're trying to make here actually helps my argument.
Thank you.
-
Tara Reade is a liar!
-
I've actually worked on fire crews cutting fire lines and you're doing it wrong.
HTH
-
I don’t know what that sentence means, but it sounds neat.
-
Thank you for providing the homosexual pedophile perspective.
-
Oopsie daisy! You just seem to roll with anything, don’t you?
-
So you present an article that confirms 90% of the allegations and then defends with phrases like "I don't recall" and "utterly baseless" from the parties in question?
We've seen this play out over and over again only to be proven true later.
Remember when the Stormy Daniels case was gonna get Trump and then she's ordered to pay Trump $300,000 after losing on appeal?
Good times
-
Oregon? Dont you mean The Bitch and stacey abrams? They are still on the $100K lecture circuit telling anyone who will listen that they won.
