"Specialist sites will enable buyers and sellers to assess risks more accurately."
Lol. Do they also allow buyers to assess the risk of contracting an STD?
For shit sakes.... Do you even try?
I'm debating whether or not to read the 26 page tl; potential dr on the illegal aliens. What's the O/U on whether it will change my position?
Probably zero since you like to make your mind up by listening to talk radio and your uninformed opinion will find fault in well researched and unbiased thoughtful positions.
"Specialist sites will enable buyers and sellers to assess risks more accurately."
Lol. Do they also allow buyers to assess the risk of contracting an STD?
For shit sakes.... Do you even try?
I'm debating whether or not to read the 26 page tl; potential dr on the illegal aliens. What's the O/U on whether it will change my position?
Probably zero since you like to make your mind up by listening to talk radio and your uninformed opinion will find fault in well researched and unbiased thoughtful positions.
I changed my mind on rhino hunting because of the convincing evidence that was presented. I would on just about any issue if the argument is persuasive and the evidence is there.
"Specialist sites will enable buyers and sellers to assess risks more accurately."
Lol. Do they also allow buyers to assess the risk of contracting an STD?
Are you twelve? Does every CEO, CFO, COO, MD, and lawyer have an STD? Nope, none of them do and their hooker to wife fucking ratio is 6:1.
Poor people get STD's.
Pretty sure less people fuck hookers than you think. But by all means keep sticking your jimmy in as many anonymous holes as you can.
Pretty sure you're wrong.
Much higher std risk from random bar hook ups than hookers. Check the facts.
Links?
Do your own fucking research. It's out there. However, be wary of biased sources, some have an agenda. Even the CDC. Unless you are planning to argue with a classic confirmation bias.
The point of this isn't if it is possible to get an STD or not, it clearly is, even if it's much much lower than you think and it is not a reason for the state to "protect" people from their choices and take their freedom. The article is about how to rethink this to make it safer and put less of a drain on our legal system then the current process, which does nothing to stop people from doing it, but it enables a more unsavory element to profit from it.
Of course the type of hooker matter and what you do with them matters. Bare pickling street crack whores in the 1 and/or 2 holes will eventually lead to a problem. As would doing the same with random drunken bar hook up. Chicks that bare pickle strangers would be high risk for STDs no matter if they do it for money or not. There are other types of hookers. High class escorts and the type the article talks about which get their business online and operate out of private residences. And using condoms lowers the risk to a very low level. Not zero, but fucking anyone bare pickle is never zero.
"Specialist sites will enable buyers and sellers to assess risks more accurately."
Lol. Do they also allow buyers to assess the risk of contracting an STD?
Are you twelve? Does every CEO, CFO, COO, MD, and lawyer have an STD? Nope, none of them do and their hooker to wife fucking ratio is 6:1.
Poor people get STD's.
Pretty sure less people fuck hookers than you think. But by all means keep sticking your jimmy in as many anonymous holes as you can.
Folks with money get laid all the fucking time and not by the woman at home.
Theeroticreview.com, go to the reviews sections. Thousands and thousands and thousands of guys talking about exactly what they did with the chick. That's only one source. There are about twelve other sites with equal content and none of it is duplicated.
Now think of the number of guys that have no interest in taking the time to write a review. It's essentially a survey. How many people in a group of 100 just willingly want to take a survey? 8 maybe?
Comments
Where can I get one?
Lol. Do they also allow buyers to assess the risk of contracting an STD?
Are you twelve? Does every CEO, CFO, COO, MD, and lawyer have an STD? Nope, none of them do and their hooker to wife fucking ratio is 6:1.
Poor people get STD's.
Much higher std risk from random bar hook ups than hookers. Check the facts.
The point of this isn't if it is possible to get an STD or not, it clearly is, even if it's much much lower than you think and it is not a reason for the state to "protect" people from their choices and take their freedom. The article is about how to rethink this to make it safer and put less of a drain on our legal system then the current process, which does nothing to stop people from doing it, but it enables a more unsavory element to profit from it.
Of course the type of hooker matter and what you do with them matters. Bare pickling street crack whores in the 1 and/or 2 holes will eventually lead to a problem. As would doing the same with random drunken bar hook up. Chicks that bare pickle strangers would be high risk for STDs no matter if they do it for money or not. There are other types of hookers. High class escorts and the type the article talks about which get their business online and operate out of private residences. And using condoms lowers the risk to a very low level. Not zero, but fucking anyone bare pickle is never zero.
Swoon
Folks with money get laid all the fucking time and not by the woman at home.
Theeroticreview.com, go to the reviews sections. Thousands and thousands and thousands of guys talking about exactly what they did with the chick. That's only one source. There are about twelve other sites with equal content and none of it is duplicated.
Now think of the number of guys that have no interest in taking the time to write a review. It's essentially a survey. How many people in a group of 100 just willingly want to take a survey? 8 maybe?
You're out of your fucking element, Donnie.
You'd think he'd grow tired of getting owned.
More that shows I'm right.