Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
More rat corruption
Bendintheriver
Member Posts: 6,030 
in Tug Tavern
We all know biden is a walking corpse. He has no idea what the radicals in his administration are doing which means they are lying and cheating every which way they can to pursue their America hating agenda.
This time it looks like they were caught fabricating signatures on documents concerning a chem plant in Louisiana. The EPA forged a local EPA leaders signature in an effort to shut down a chem plant that manufactures elastomers. They are lying when they claim that the plant is a cancer risk. The town where the Denka Performance Elastomer plant is located happens to have one of the lowest rates of cancer per capita in the entire state. This is the only plant in the USA that produces these particular elastomers (neoprene), used in products that are very common in the US.
The biden admin has been trying to sue the company in an effort to shut them down and to bolster their make believe case, they forged signatures.
This is now an all too common tactic by the left. They sue based on lies and use tax payer funds to put businesses that radical rats dislike out of business, resulting in families who lose their jobs and livelihoods. When a government goes this out of control, nothing good comes of it. If the government can't follow our laws there will be mayhem.
https://foxwilmington.com/politics/biden-admin-appears-to-fabricate-paper-trail-in-pursuit-of-major-chemical-plant-shutdown-court-docs/
Biden admin appears to fabricate paper trail in pursuit of major chemical plant shutdown: court docs
The Biden administration appears to have intervened in a supposedly nonpartisan science review, manufacturing a paper trail in support of its environmental justice efforts targeting a major chemical plant, according to court filings reviewed by Fox News Digital.
In stunning testimony late last year, Michael Morton — who serves as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 6 science liaison to the EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD) in Washington, D.C. — admitted that he didn’t author a key July 2021 email sent from his email address. That email called off a scientific review of health risks associated with chloroprene emissions which are at the center of an ongoing federal lawsuit with vast economic implications.
“I didn’t write that,” Morton told lawyers for synthetics manufacturer Denka Performance Elastomer (DPE) during a deposition in November. “I didn’t say that. For – for that part, I didn’t – I don’t know that, so I don’t know who wrote that,” he added when pressed on the email.
Morton’s testimony and revelations from additional information made public in recent months may ultimately derail the Biden administration’s lawsuit against DPE which, if successful, could threaten the future operations of the company’s major manufacturing facility in LaPlace, Louisiana, and further set a precedent broadly threatening the multi-billion-dollar U.S. petrochemical industry.
The company also characterized the Biden administration’s efforts against it as politically driven, unsupported by real-world science, and outside its legal authority under the Clean Air Act. DPE pointed to how its LaPlace facility has sharply curbed its chloroprene emissions and complied with environmental permits.
DPE also pointed to Louisiana Tumor Registry data showing that St. John the Baptist Parish, the region where its neoprene facility is located, has recorded one of the lowest cancer rates of any region in the state.
And, notably, DPE has criticized EPA for basing its lawsuit largely on a study the agency published in 2010 concluding chloroprene is “likely to be carcinogenic to humans.” That study, which itself cites 25-year-old studies of female mice, led to the strict emissions standard of 0.2 micrograms of chloroprene per cubic meter air that the EPA is seeking to enforce on DPE’s facility in LaPlace.
DPE and Lousiana lawmakers have for years sought EPA action to reassess that tight standard, arguing in favor of additional study and scientific review, arguing the 2010 study overestimated chloroprene’s cancer risk to humans.
This time it looks like they were caught fabricating signatures on documents concerning a chem plant in Louisiana. The EPA forged a local EPA leaders signature in an effort to shut down a chem plant that manufactures elastomers. They are lying when they claim that the plant is a cancer risk. The town where the Denka Performance Elastomer plant is located happens to have one of the lowest rates of cancer per capita in the entire state. This is the only plant in the USA that produces these particular elastomers (neoprene), used in products that are very common in the US.
The biden admin has been trying to sue the company in an effort to shut them down and to bolster their make believe case, they forged signatures.
This is now an all too common tactic by the left. They sue based on lies and use tax payer funds to put businesses that radical rats dislike out of business, resulting in families who lose their jobs and livelihoods. When a government goes this out of control, nothing good comes of it. If the government can't follow our laws there will be mayhem.
https://foxwilmington.com/politics/biden-admin-appears-to-fabricate-paper-trail-in-pursuit-of-major-chemical-plant-shutdown-court-docs/
Biden admin appears to fabricate paper trail in pursuit of major chemical plant shutdown: court docs
The Biden administration appears to have intervened in a supposedly nonpartisan science review, manufacturing a paper trail in support of its environmental justice efforts targeting a major chemical plant, according to court filings reviewed by Fox News Digital.
In stunning testimony late last year, Michael Morton — who serves as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 6 science liaison to the EPA Office of Research and Development (ORD) in Washington, D.C. — admitted that he didn’t author a key July 2021 email sent from his email address. That email called off a scientific review of health risks associated with chloroprene emissions which are at the center of an ongoing federal lawsuit with vast economic implications.
“I didn’t write that,” Morton told lawyers for synthetics manufacturer Denka Performance Elastomer (DPE) during a deposition in November. “I didn’t say that. For – for that part, I didn’t – I don’t know that, so I don’t know who wrote that,” he added when pressed on the email.
Morton’s testimony and revelations from additional information made public in recent months may ultimately derail the Biden administration’s lawsuit against DPE which, if successful, could threaten the future operations of the company’s major manufacturing facility in LaPlace, Louisiana, and further set a precedent broadly threatening the multi-billion-dollar U.S. petrochemical industry.
The company also characterized the Biden administration’s efforts against it as politically driven, unsupported by real-world science, and outside its legal authority under the Clean Air Act. DPE pointed to how its LaPlace facility has sharply curbed its chloroprene emissions and complied with environmental permits.
DPE also pointed to Louisiana Tumor Registry data showing that St. John the Baptist Parish, the region where its neoprene facility is located, has recorded one of the lowest cancer rates of any region in the state.
And, notably, DPE has criticized EPA for basing its lawsuit largely on a study the agency published in 2010 concluding chloroprene is “likely to be carcinogenic to humans.” That study, which itself cites 25-year-old studies of female mice, led to the strict emissions standard of 0.2 micrograms of chloroprene per cubic meter air that the EPA is seeking to enforce on DPE’s facility in LaPlace.
DPE and Lousiana lawmakers have for years sought EPA action to reassess that tight standard, arguing in favor of additional study and scientific review, arguing the 2010 study overestimated chloroprene’s cancer risk to humans.