The Athletic: Scouting the Huskies
Comments
-
You can read all Athletic articles for free by just pressing Show Reader in your browser
-
-
One of the biggest challenges for people in evaluating DeBoer and UW is that I really don't think a lot of them know or understand what he's doing.
To the outside observer, it looks like smoke and mirrors at times ...
But there is a decided method to the madness that has strong elements of changing the way the game is played and thought ...
Here's the best way that I can compare/contrast what UW and Texas does offensively:
With UW, they are going to constantly adjust their formation until they are able to establish a read or look that they like and want to take advantage of ... the times where they struggle often come because they are trying to force something
With Texas, there's a lot of predetermined elements of Sark and if you follow his motion it will often tip off the intent of the play ... while it's easy to say it is either leading you to the play or dressed up eye candy, the reality is that anybody that has closely followed Sark for years (like most here) can successfully call out his play calling at a reasonably high rate for internet half brains ... this idea that Sark has no tendencies and that he's not predictable at all is just laughable and more of an indictment at how bad the Big12 was this year than anything else. -
I cancelled when NY Times bought them out
-
Contemplating this business model gives me heaps of unneeded anxiety. Drowning the lifeguard because you can’t swim.Bob_C said:Looks like The Athletic is doing well.
-
Tequilla said:
One of the biggest challenges for people in evaluating DeBoer and UW is that I really don't think a lot of them know or understand what he's doing.
To the outside observer, it looks like smoke and mirrors at times ...
But there is a decided method to the madness that has strong elements of changing the way the game is played and thought ...
Here's the best way that I can compare/contrast what UW and Texas does offensively:
With UW, they are going to constantly adjust their formation until they are able to establish a read or look that they like and want to take advantage of ... the times where they struggle often come because they are trying to force something
With Texas, there's a lot of predetermined elements of Sark and if you follow his motion it will often tip off the intent of the play ... while it's easy to say it is either leading you to the play or dressed up eye candy, the reality is that anybody that has closely followed Sark for years (like most here) can successfully call out his play calling at a reasonably high rate for internet half brains ... this idea that Sark has no tendencies and that he's not predictable at all is just laughable and more of an indictment at how bad the Big12 was this year than anything else.
Sark to the Big12. -
Boner and Grubb can put points on anyone with the current offensive roster. Defense just needs to get 2-3 stops and the game should be close enough to where we win by 1-3 points
-
its weird to think that if your defense can just get 3 stops that you will win, but with this team that is true ~ stranger than fiction.
-
The defense only needs 1 more stop (punt, turnover, 4th down conversion) than the other team.TheRoarOfTheCrowd said:its weird to think that if your defense can just get 3 stops that you will win, but with this team that is true ~ stranger than fiction.
I think for UW to win the game, they’ll need 4-5 total stops. -
Same. My subscription ends Dec. 31. For the past six months or so, I’ve rated every story “meh.”jecornel said:After the Athletic dropped Caple I canceled.
That’ll show them.
